[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0966c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.12 6 3rqiA CA Rep, Mult 44,120,122
20.04 2 3uomA CA Rep, Mult 21,23
30.04 2 1x06A FPS Rep, Mult 121,145,178,180
40.04 2 2iq7A UUU Rep, Mult 116,120,141
50.02 1 1y66B DIO Rep, Mult 42,45,49
60.02 1 1d4m1 MYR Rep, Mult 187,188
70.02 1 1ia5A MAN Rep, Mult 127,128,131
80.02 1 1cm5B NA Rep, Mult 144,146,152,192
90.02 1 1kj4B III Rep, Mult 176,178
100.02 1 2izxA DTD Rep, Mult 45,48,49,52
110.02 1 4x4qA MG Rep, Mult 132,179
120.02 1 2jigB ZN Rep, Mult 155,157
130.02 1 4as8A EDO Rep, Mult 63,65,76
140.02 1 5tglA HEE Rep, Mult 116,184
150.02 1 3cf4A SF4 Rep, Mult 20,22,23,29,71
160.02 1 1rmgA MAN Rep, Mult 34,36,37,38,40
170.02 1 3sjqC PHU Rep, Mult 67,68

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601airA0.4755.350.0870.7954.2.2.2NA
20.0601hg8A0.4635.560.0640.8053.2.1.15NA
30.0602z8gB0.4585.760.0920.7903.2.1.57NA
40.0601wmrA0.4545.560.0710.8153.2.1.57NA
50.0603maxA0.4375.040.0560.6853.5.1.98120
60.0602pecA0.4725.330.0630.8054.2.2.2111
70.0601jtaA0.4755.230.0540.8254.2.2.2NA
80.0601rmgA0.4675.130.0440.7953.2.1.-NA
90.0602pflA0.4425.250.0480.7252.3.1.54185
100.0601pclA0.4475.660.0560.7954.2.2.2NA
110.0601ru4A0.4405.790.0290.7504.2.2.2NA
120.0603h09B0.4315.500.0830.7003.4.21.72NA
130.0601bn8A0.4715.160.0560.8104.2.2.2NA
140.0601idjA0.4775.360.0430.8054.2.2.10NA
150.0601omjA0.4444.660.0560.6853.4.24.40170
160.0601ogmX0.4575.690.0650.7803.2.1.11NA
170.0601ib4A0.4565.290.0530.7703.2.1.15115
180.0601wcgA0.4335.830.0410.7853.2.1.147NA
190.0601ogoX0.4595.720.0650.7853.2.1.11NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.060.3815.700.050.674w8jA GO:0005102 GO:0006952 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
10.060.2865.770.020.514b4uB GO:0000105 GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0004477 GO:0004488 GO:0006164 GO:0006730 GO:0008152 GO:0008652 GO:0009086 GO:0009396 GO:0016491 GO:0016787 GO:0035999 GO:0055114
20.060.2865.790.050.494g41A GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0008652 GO:0008782 GO:0008930 GO:0009086 GO:0009116 GO:0009164 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0019509
30.060.3425.680.040.593zh3A GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0007049 GO:0008360 GO:0008760 GO:0009252 GO:0016740 GO:0016765 GO:0019277 GO:0051301 GO:0071236 GO:0071555
40.060.2735.090.040.441lr5A GO:0004872 GO:0005783 GO:0005788 GO:0008270 GO:0009734 GO:0010011 GO:0046872
50.060.2536.310.010.482be3A GO:0015969
60.060.2614.550.020.403rofA GO:0004721 GO:0004725 GO:0006470 GO:0016787 GO:0035335
70.060.2815.870.030.521i9rH
80.060.2255.330.060.392di7A GO:0005783 GO:0005788 GO:0006664 GO:0046527
90.060.2495.270.040.414bz4B GO:0046872
100.060.2265.580.030.403wo4C GO:0004872 GO:0005886 GO:0006954 GO:0006955 GO:0007165 GO:0007166 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0070301 GO:0071345
110.060.2486.060.030.464cl1D GO:0000166 GO:0001172 GO:0003723 GO:0003968 GO:0004197 GO:0004252 GO:0004386 GO:0005198 GO:0005524 GO:0006508 GO:0008026 GO:0008236 GO:0008270 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0016787 GO:0017111 GO:0019012 GO:0019028 GO:0019031 GO:0019079 GO:0019087 GO:0039694 GO:0046872
120.060.2745.560.040.484av2A GO:0006810 GO:0008565 GO:0009279 GO:0009297 GO:0009306 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0019867 GO:0030420
130.060.2615.130.060.423mvkG GO:0005996 GO:0016853 GO:0048029
140.060.2225.550.030.393t8nB GO:0004769 GO:0006629 GO:0008202 GO:0016853
150.060.2545.120.040.434aqzA GO:0006810 GO:0008565 GO:0009279 GO:0009297 GO:0009306 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0019867 GO:0030420
160.060.2025.100.030.321jpyA GO:0005125 GO:0005126 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0006954 GO:0016525 GO:0017015 GO:0019955 GO:0042089 GO:0042109 GO:0042803 GO:0045076 GO:0045408 GO:0045414 GO:0045423 GO:0045944 GO:0051216 GO:1900017 GO:2000778
170.060.2095.670.070.382i85A GO:0001525 GO:0001618 GO:0001945 GO:0002042 GO:0005102 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0005925 GO:0007155 GO:0007267 GO:0007275 GO:0007399 GO:0007411 GO:0009653 GO:0009887 GO:0010839 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0030154 GO:0031295 GO:0046718 GO:0046875 GO:0048013 GO:0048514 GO:0050920 GO:0072178 GO:2000727
180.060.2394.760.090.384v9fY GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003723 GO:0003735 GO:0005622 GO:0005840 GO:0006281 GO:0006412 GO:0019843 GO:0030529


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0000166 GO:0004488 GO:0004477 GO:0005102 GO:0008782 GO:0008930 GO:0008270 GO:0010011 GO:0008760 GO:0004872
GO-Score 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
Biological Processes GO:0006164 GO:0009405 GO:0006952 GO:0009164 GO:0030435 GO:0019509 GO:0035999 GO:0000105 GO:0009396 GO:0055114 GO:0009734 GO:0019277 GO:0007049 GO:0009252 GO:0008360 GO:0071555 GO:0071236 GO:0051301
GO-Score 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
Cellular Component GO:0005788 GO:0005829
GO-Score 0.06 0.06

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.