[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0964c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.12 7 2c6rA FE Rep, Mult 58,62
20.07 4 3hndA TTP Rep, Mult 9,10,11,56,57,63
30.05 3 3fu1A ZN Rep, Mult 54,58
40.03 2 1mvyA GLC Rep, Mult 23,24,26,87,88,91,92
50.03 2 2wghB DTP Rep, Mult 53,81,89,90,91
60.02 1 3rj1J SE Rep, Mult 51,52
70.02 1 3u7qB IMD Rep, Mult 40,43
80.02 1 3ictA FAD Rep, Mult 83,85
90.02 1 4a8fA MG Rep, Mult 79,123
100.02 1 3hncB TTP Rep, Mult 97,153,157
110.02 1 3b2sA MG Rep, Mult 100,101
120.02 1 1m9nB AMZ Rep, Mult 29,30,47,80
130.02 1 1ipsA MN Rep, Mult 62,63
140.02 1 3qsjA CA Rep, Mult 7,58,62
150.02 1 2hi8X BR Rep, Mult 35,52,53
160.02 1 1pl0B BW2 Rep, Mult 10,11,95,97,98
170.02 1 4ea2A MG Rep, Mult 26,83

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601ddzA0.4454.890.0490.7504.2.1.1NA
20.0602wu8A0.4484.880.1210.7445.3.1.9NA
30.0601occA0.4464.630.0420.7131.9.3.1NA
40.0603d6nA0.4464.610.0390.6883.5.2.318
50.0602e8yA0.4663.880.0550.6753.2.1.41NA
60.0601r7aA0.4604.670.0940.7382.4.1.7NA
70.0601xrtA0.3714.850.0440.6253.5.2.3NA
80.0601p4rA0.4655.330.0330.8252.1.2.3,3.5.4.10NA
90.0601edqA0.4304.720.0340.6883.2.1.14NA
100.0601peuA0.4434.890.0440.7381.17.4.1NA
110.0601jnrA0.4405.350.0350.8061.8.99.2NA
120.0601pn0C0.4405.120.0130.7621.14.13.7NA
130.0602vr5A0.5124.550.0630.7873.2.1.-NA
140.0602f89F0.4115.820.0390.8122.5.1.1,2.5.1.10NA
150.0602cvtA0.4454.740.0890.7311.17.4.1NA
160.0601s46A0.4644.650.0610.7192.4.1.4NA
170.0601g8mA0.4735.240.0400.8193.5.4.10,2.1.2.3NA
180.0601ta9B0.4515.210.0130.7751.1.1.6NA
190.0601kq3A0.4435.210.0350.7621.1.1.6NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.090.6413.890.130.924s3pA GO:0000025 GO:0004134 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005975 GO:0005977 GO:0016740 GO:0016757
10.070.5124.320.060.784okdA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975
20.070.4924.440.080.762wskA GO:0003824 GO:0004133 GO:0004135 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0005977 GO:0005980 GO:0006974 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
30.070.5024.720.050.791bf2A GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0005977 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0019156 GO:0046872
40.070.5124.550.060.792vr5A GO:0003824 GO:0004133 GO:0004177 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0005980 GO:0006508
50.070.4663.960.060.682wanA
60.070.5024.130.060.742vncB GO:0003824 GO:0004133 GO:0004177 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0005980 GO:0006508
70.070.4064.900.070.683fawA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0005975 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030246
80.070.4884.120.140.735csuA GO:0000025 GO:0004134 GO:0005975 GO:0005977 GO:0005983 GO:0006006 GO:0009501 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0016740 GO:0016757
90.070.4674.010.040.694aioA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0046872 GO:0051060
100.070.4663.880.060.682e8yA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0051060
110.070.4633.940.060.682ya1A GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0005975 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030246
120.070.4183.950.050.621ea9C GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0047798
130.070.4624.090.090.683wdhA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0046872 GO:0051060
140.060.4654.590.060.723ueqA GO:0003824 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0047669
150.060.3934.420.040.624howA GO:0003824 GO:0005975 GO:0016853 GO:0046872
160.060.4094.090.060.623a6oA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0031216 GO:0046872
170.060.3924.130.060.574aieA GO:0003824 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0043896 GO:0046872
180.060.4194.300.030.643amlA GO:0003824 GO:0003844 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0005978 GO:0005982 GO:0009501 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0019252 GO:0043169


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016798
GO-Score 0.48
Biological Processes GO:0044723 GO:0006073 GO:0006112
GO-Score 0.41 0.41 0.41
Cellular Component GO:0005829 GO:0005576
GO-Score 0.09 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.