I-TASSER results

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0911

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>protein (257 residues)
MPTRSSAPLGAPCWIDLTTSDVDRAQDFYGTVFGWAFESAGPDYGGYINAAKGGHPVAGL
MANRPEFQSPDGWATYFHTVDIGATVAKLAAAGGSSCLDPMEVPGKGFMSLAVDPSGAAF
GLWQPLQHHGFEVIGEAGSPVWHQLTTRDYRSVIDFYRQVFGWRTEQISDTDEFCYTTAW
FDDQQLLGVMDGSSCLPEGVPSNWTIFFGAEDVDETLRVICDNGGSVVRAAENTPYGRLA
AAADPMGVVFNLSSLQA

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MPTRSSAPLGAPCWIDLTTSDVDRAQDFYGTVFGWAFESAGPDYGGYINAAKGGHPVAGLMANRPEFQSPDGWATYFHTVDIGATVAKLAAAGGSSCLDPMEVPGKGFMSLAVDPSGAAFGLWQPLQHHGFEVIGEAGSPVWHQLTTRDYRSVIDFYRQVFGWRTEQISDTDEFCYTTAWFDDQQLLGVMDGSSCLPEGVPSNWTIFFGAEDVDETLRVICDNGGSVVRAAENTPYGRLAAAADPMGVVFNLSSLQA
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEHCCCCCCCEEEHCCCCCCEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEHCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEHCCEHCCCCEEEEEEEHCCCCEEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEHCCCCCCCEEEEEHCCCCCEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEHCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEHCCHCCCCEEEEEEHCCCCCEEEEEEHCC
Conf.Score	99989999985689987589999999999999697898779998867997589875577755788888998579999848889999999999999986875558975899999689988999867888877767778876557888599999999999998988876688998668999769975677765788888889986899998599999999999999999858744688589999879998899998689
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MPTRSSAPLGAPCWIDLTTSDVDRAQDFYGTVFGWAFESAGPDYGGYINAAKGGHPVAGLMANRPEFQSPDGWATYFHTVDIGATVAKLAAAGGSSCLDPMEVPGKGFMSLAVDPSGAAFGLWQPLQHHGFEVIGEAGSPVWHQLTTRDYRSVIDFYRQVFGWRTEQISDTDEFCYTTAWFDDQQLLGVMDGSSCLPEGVPSNWTIFFGAEDVDETLRVICDNGGSVVRAAENTPYGRLAAAADPMGVVFNLSSLQA
Prediction	86545534411000012224204202411351040313434463120010236442000002334645322000000104203400520372404122232624410000001033401000002232432333333432331102022143025103400413245254443010000224431000003235523653211010001041034005203724041133337132000000122340200011268
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Normalized B-facotr

(B-factor is a value to indicate the extent of the inherent thermal mobility of residues/atoms in proteins. In I-TASSER, this value is deduced from threading template proteins from the PDB in combination with the sequence profiles derived from sequence databases. The reported B-factor profile in the figure below corresponds to the normalized B-factor of the target protein, defined by B=(B'-u)/s, where B' is the raw B-factor value, u and s are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the raw B-factors along the sequence. (Click here to read more about predicted normalized B-factor)

Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
Hit

Iden1

Iden2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
Align.

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

Sec.Str
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEHCCCCCCCEEEHCCCCCCEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEHCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEHCCEHCCCCEEEEEEEHCCCCEEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEHCCCCCCCEEEEEHCCCCCEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEHCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEHCCHCCCCEEEEEEHCCCCCEEEEEEHCC
MPTRSSAPLGAPCWIDLTTSDVDRAQDFYGTVFGWAFESAGPDYGGYINAAKGGHPVAGLMANRPEFQSPDGWATYFHTVDIGATVAKLAAAGGSSCLDPMEVPGKGFMSLAVDPSGAAFGLWQPLQHHGFEVIGEAGSPVWHQLTTRDYRSVIDFYRQVFGWRTEQISDTDEFCYTTAWFDDQQLLGVMDGSSCLPEGVPSNWTIFFGAEDVDETLRVICDNGGSVVRAAENTPYGRLAAAADPMGVVFNLSSLQA

3oxhA

0.33

0.32

0.94

2.95

MUSTER

MPKRSEYRQGTPNWVDLQTTDQSAAKKFYTSLFGWGYDDNP---GVYSMATLNGEAVAAIAPMPPG-AMPPIWNTYIAVDDVDAVVDKVVPGGGQVMMPAFDIGDAGRMSFITDPTGAAVGLWQANRHIGATLVNETGTLIWNELLTDKPDLALAFYEAVVGLTHSSM-------YRVLKAGDAEVGGCMEPPM---PGVPNHWHVYFAVDDADATAAKAAAAGGQVIAEPADIPVGRFAVLSDPQGAIFSVLKA-A

3oxhA

0.33

0.31

0.94

3.81

dPPAS

MPKRSEYRQGTPNWVDLQTTDQSAAKKFYTSLFGWGYDDNP---GVYSMATLNGEAVAAIAPMPPG-AMPPIWNTYIAVDDVDAVVDKVVPGGGQVMMPAFDIGDAGRMSFITDPTGAAVGLWQANRHIGATLVNETGTLIWNELLTDKPDLALAFYEAVVGLTHSSM-------YRVLKAGDAEVGGCMEPP---MPGVPNHWHVYFAVDDADATAAKAAAAGGQVIAEPADIPVGRFAVLSDPQGAIFSVLKAA-

3oxhA

0.33

0.31

0.94

4.52

wdPPAS

MPKRSEYRQGTPNWVDLQTTDQSAAKKFYTSLFGWGYDDNP---GVYSMATLNGEAVAAIAPMPPG-AMPPIWNTYIAVDDVDAVVDKVVPGGGQVMMPAFDIGDAGRMSFITDPTGAAVGLWQANRHIGATLVNETGTLIWNELLTDKPDLALAFYEAVVGLTHSSM-------YRVLKAGDAEVGGCMEPP---MPGVPNHWHVYFAVDDADATAAKAAAAGGQVIAEPADIPVGRFAVLSDPQGAIFSVLKAA-

3oxhA

0.33

0.32

0.94

3.95

wMUSTER

MPKRSEYRQGTPNWVDLQTTDQSAAKKFYTSLFGWGYDDNP---GVYSMATLNGEAVAAIAPMPPG-AMPPIWNTYIAVDDVDAVVDKVVPGGGQVMMPAFDIGDAGRMSFITDPTGAAVGLWQANRHIGATLVNETGTLIWNELLTDKPDLALAFYEAVVGLTHSSM-------YRVLKAGDAEVGGCMEPP---MPGVPNHWHVYFAVDDADATAAKAAAAGGQVIAEPADIPVGRFAVLSDPQGAIFSVLKA-A

3oxhA

0.33

0.32

0.94

4.92

wPPAS

MPKRSEYRQGTPNWVDLQTTDQSAAKKFYTSLFGWGYDDNP---GVYSMATLNGEAVAAIAPMPPG-AMPPIWNTYIAVDDVDAVVDKVVPGGGQVMMPAFDIGDAGRMSFITDPTGAAVGLWQANRHIGATLVNETGTLIWNELLTDKPDLALAFYEAVVGLTHSSM-------YRVLKAGDAEVGGCMEPP---MPGVPNHWHVYFAVDDADATAAKAAAAGGQVIAEPADIPVGRFAVLSDPQGAIFSVLKA-A

3oxhA

0.33

0.31

0.94

8.12

dPPAS2

MPKRSEYRQGTPNWVDLQTTDQSAAKKFYTSLFGWGYDDNP---GVYSMATLNGEAVAAIAPMPPG-AMPPIWNTYIAVDDVDAVVDKVVPGGGQVMMPAFDIGDAGRMSFITDPTGAAVGLWQANRHIGATLVNETGTLIWNELLTDKPDLALAFYEAVVGLTHSSM-------YRVLKAGDAEVGGCMEPP---MPGVPNHWHVYFAVDDADATAAKAAAAGGQVIAEPADIPVGRFAVLSDPQGAIFSVLKAA-

3oxhA

0.33

0.32

0.94

4.43

PPAS

MPKRSEYRQGTPNWVDLQTTDQSAAKKFYTSLFGWGYDDNP---GVYSMATLNGEAVAAIAPMPPG-AMPPIWNTYIAVDDVDAVVDKVVPGGGQVMMPAFDIGDAGRMSFITDPTGAAVGLWQANRHIGATLVNETGTLIWNELLTDKPDLALAFYEAVVGLTHSSM-------YRVLKAGDAEVGGCMEPP---MPGVPNHWHVYFAVDDADATAAKAAAAGGQVIAEPADIPVGRFAVLSDPQGAIFSVLKA-A

3oxhA

0.33

0.32

0.94

5.80

Env-PPAS

MPKRSEYRQGTPNWVDLQTTDQSAAKKFYTSLFGWGYDDNP---GVYSMATLNGEAVAAIAPMPPG-AMPPIWNTYIAVDDVDAVVDKVVPGGGQVMMPAFDIGDAGRMSFITDPTGAAVGLWQANRHIGATLVNETGTLIWNELLTDKPDLALAFYEAVVGLTHSSM-------YRVLKAGDAEVGGCM---EPPMPGVPNHWHVYFAVDDADATAAKAAAAGGQVIAEPADIPVGRFAVLSDPQGAIFSVLKA-A

4ro6A

0.19

0.18

0.96

1.66

MUSTER

VDWHKHDSK-RMLHAVYRVGDLDRTIKYYTECFGMLLRKRDVPDEKYTNAFENTNFAVELTYNYGVDKGTGFGHFAIANDDVYKLAENIKSKGGKITREPGPVKGGSVIAFAQDPDGYMFELIQRADTPEP--------LCQVMLRVGDLERSIKFYEKALGMKLLRKKDVPDYKYTIAMLDKTTVLELTYNYGVTEYSKNAYAQVAIGTNDVYKSAEAVDLATGKILRQPGPLPNTKIASFVDPDGWKVVLVDNTD

4ro6A

0.17

0.16

0.96

1.86

dPPAS

-VDWHKHDSKRMLHAVYRVGDLDRTIKYYTECFGMKLLRKDEKYTNAFLGFGPENTLTYNYGVDKYDIGTGFGHFAIANDDVYKLAENIKSKGGKITREPGPVKGGSVIAFAQDPDGYMFELIQRADTPEP--------LCQVMLRVGDLERSIKFYEKALGMKLLRKKDVPDYKYTIAMLGYADLELTYNYGVTEYSKGNAYAQVAIGTNDAEAVDLATKELGGKILRQPGPLPGIKIASFVDPDGWKVVLVDNTD

(a)	Iden1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	Iden2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment.
(e)	Download Align. list the threading program used to identify the template provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates.

Top 1 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)

More about C-score

Local structure accuracy of first model

Download Model 1

C-score=1.64

Estimated TM-score = 0.94±0.05

Estimated RMSD = 2.6±1.9Å

Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)

Top 10 Identified stuctural analogs in PDB

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov
1	3oxhA	0.924	0.87	0.326	0.942
2	1sp8D	0.708	4.11	0.079	0.946
3	1sp9B	0.704	3.82	0.075	0.934
4	1t47A	0.702	3.91	0.114	0.926
5	3isqA	0.698	3.99	0.102	0.922
6	2r5vA	0.697	3.96	0.096	0.922
7	3hpvA	0.686	4.13	0.136	0.930
8	3ecjA	0.685	3.95	0.107	0.910
9	1mpyA	0.684	4.12	0.137	0.926
10	3zgjA	0.684	3.91	0.103	0.899

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)

Ligand binding sites

Rank	C-score	Cluster size	PDB Hit	Lig Name	Download Complex	Ligand Binding Site Residues
1	0.14	5	3oa4A	ZN	Rep, Mult	14,59,74,121
2	0.12	3	3oxhA	PMB	Rep, Mult	40,47,103,106,128
3	0.08	2	3oxhA	XYL	Rep, Mult	135,141,142,186
4	0.06	2	3vb0A	FE2	Rep, Mult	143,205,207,241,251
5	0.06	2	2ei3A	BPY	Rep, Mult	24,28,32,244,245
6	0.03	1	2ei0A	BP7	Rep, Mult	162,164,180,181,182
7	0.03	1	1lgtA	BP3	Rep, Mult	50,51,52,58,138,139,140
8	0.03	1	3uomA	CA	Rep, Mult	212,214
9	0.03	1	1lkdA	BP6	Rep, Mult	200,201,248,250

	Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
	Download the templates clustering results.
(a)	C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)	Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)	Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)	Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column. Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	EC Number	Active Site Residues
1	0.084	1kmyA	0.659	4.03	0.107	0.899	1.13.11.39	78,150
2	0.077	1eilA	0.660	4.05	0.102	0.903	1.13.11.39	78
3	0.070	2ehzA	0.665	4.14	0.104	0.914	1.13.11.-	78
4	0.068	1f1uA	0.684	3.91	0.111	0.907	1.13.11.15	NA
5	0.067	1cjxA	0.670	4.21	0.104	0.910	1.13.11.27	97,112
6	0.067	3ecjA	0.685	3.95	0.107	0.910	1.13.11.15	NA
7	0.060	3mmtA	0.433	5.91	0.077	0.697	4.1.2.13	18
8	0.060	2z1sA	0.367	6.01	0.067	0.615	3.2.1.21	162
9	0.060	2e3zA	0.426	6.09	0.061	0.700	3.2.1.21	211
10	0.060	2zi8A	0.653	4.32	0.114	0.910	1.13.11.39	150
11	0.060	3mbfA	0.429	5.80	0.066	0.685	4.1.2.13	NA
12	0.060	3cmjA	0.421	5.72	0.043	0.673	3.2.1.21	211
13	0.060	1sqdA	0.707	3.87	0.087	0.938	1.13.11.27	NA
14	0.060	1gttD	0.425	5.56	0.065	0.693	4.1.1.68,5.3.3.10	NA
15	0.060	3aboA	0.427	5.65	0.062	0.677	4.3.1.7	75
16	0.060	2zoxA	0.429	5.81	0.064	0.681	3.2.1.21	153,162
17	0.060	1fbaA	0.416	6.12	0.073	0.685	4.1.2.13	NA
18	0.060	1mpyA	0.684	4.12	0.137	0.926	1.13.11.2	NA
19	0.060	1t47A	0.702	3.91	0.114	0.926	1.13.11.27	NA
20	0.060	1yniB	0.423	6.05	0.028	0.704	3.5.3.23	NA
21	0.060	1wd9A	0.408	6.10	0.053	0.700	3.5.3.15	27,222
22	0.060	3lm4D	0.665	4.06	0.113	0.899	1.13.11.2	115,122,145,162,164
23	0.060	2e9lA	0.427	5.69	0.054	0.673	3.2.1.21	NA
24	0.060	1sqiA	0.676	4.12	0.102	0.907	1.13.11.27	72
25	0.060	2jf6B	0.423	6.06	0.049	0.700	3.2.1.105	NA

(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Rank	Cscore^GO	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	PDB Hit	Associated GO Terms
Homologous GO templates in PDB
0	0.49	0.924	0.87	0.33	0.94	3oxhA	GO:0005886
1	0.12	0.704	3.82	0.07	0.93	1sp9B	GO:0003868 GO:0005737 GO:0006559 GO:0006572 GO:0009072 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0042802 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
2	0.11	0.696	4.14	0.10	0.93	3zgjB	GO:0003868 GO:0009072 GO:0016701 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
3	0.11	0.700	3.97	0.10	0.92	5ec3A	GO:0003868 GO:0005829 GO:0006559 GO:0006572 GO:0009072 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114 GO:0070062
4	0.11	0.697	3.96	0.10	0.92	2r5vA	GO:0003868 GO:0005506 GO:0009072 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0017000 GO:0033072 GO:0046872 GO:0050585 GO:0055114
5	0.10	0.394	3.27	0.18	0.48	3kolA	GO:0004462 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
6	0.10	0.708	4.11	0.08	0.95	1sp8D
7	0.10	0.702	3.91	0.11	0.93	1t47A	GO:0003868 GO:0006559 GO:0006572 GO:0009072 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
8	0.10	0.674	4.02	0.10	0.89	1sqiB	GO:0000139 GO:0003868 GO:0005737 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0005794 GO:0006559 GO:0006572 GO:0009072 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
9	0.09	0.383	2.89	0.15	0.46	3rmuA	GO:0004493 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0016853 GO:0019626 GO:0046491 GO:0046872
10	0.09	0.670	4.21	0.10	0.91	1cjxA	GO:0003868 GO:0006559 GO:0006572 GO:0009072 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
11	0.06	0.391	3.08	0.13	0.46	3gm5A	GO:0016829
12	0.06	0.371	7.00	0.05	0.73	5e6uA	GO:0002291 GO:0005886 GO:0006928 GO:0006954 GO:0007155 GO:0007157 GO:0007159 GO:0007160 GO:0007165 GO:0007229 GO:0008305 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016337 GO:0030198 GO:0030369 GO:0032403 GO:0034687 GO:0043113 GO:0046872 GO:0046982 GO:0050776 GO:0050839 GO:0050900 GO:0070062
13	0.06	0.394	3.06	0.08	0.47	3oa4A	GO:0046872
14	0.06	0.387	2.93	0.19	0.47	1jc5B	GO:0004493 GO:0016853
15	0.06	0.328	6.20	0.05	0.56	1r3nA	GO:0003837 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016813 GO:0046872
16	0.06	0.324	6.06	0.08	0.56	2cxiA	GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003723 GO:0004812 GO:0004826 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006432 GO:0016874
17	0.06	0.394	6.12	0.07	0.67	4ur9A	GO:0004563 GO:0005975 GO:0006517 GO:0008152 GO:0016231 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
18	0.06	0.331	6.53	0.03	0.61	4wxyC	GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016829 GO:0036381 GO:0042819 GO:0042823

Consensus prediction of GO terms

Molecular Function	GO:0003868	GO:0046872
GO-Score	0.38	0.38
Biological Processes	GO:1901606	GO:0006558	GO:0009074	GO:0009063	GO:0006570	GO:0055114
GO-Score	0.43	0.43	0.43	0.43	0.43	0.38
Cellular Component	GO:0005886
GO-Score	0.49

(a)	Cscore^GO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)	The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on Cscore^GO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1.	J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2.	J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.	A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.	Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.