[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0909

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.25 177 3is7K HEM Rep, Mult 19,22,23,26,42,46,49,50,52,53
20.06 41 3wqjA 22B Rep, Mult 23,26,29,30,38,41,42,45,46
30.05 42 4pj0I CLA Rep, Mult 44,45,47,48,51,52
40.05 35 3wmmB CRT Rep, Mult 36,37,40,41,44
50.04 31 3m4oA C7P Rep, Mult 43,44,47
60.03 22 3nozX PLL Rep, Mult 29,38,42,45
70.03 21 4qpqF NUC Rep, Mult 36,37,38,39
80.03 24 2rccB ZN Rep, Mult 18,48,51
90.03 22 1gwgA IOD Rep, Mult 33,34,35,38
100.02 14 5i50B NUC Rep, Mult 41,44,45,48
110.01 5 3is7A HEM Rep, Mult 7,8,11,15,19,22,23
120.01 11 3kbkA HG Rep, Mult 21,25,44,48
130.00 2 1hvvA TAR Rep, Mult 26,29,30
140.00 3 1tkoB FE Rep, Mult 30,34
150.00 2 3j000 PEV Rep, Mult 23,27
160.00 1 3k2sB POV Rep, Mult 1,4

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.1841cxzB0.7062.060.0560.8482.7.11.1322,24
20.1671urfA0.6411.650.0510.7972.7.11.1321
30.1451fyjA0.5841.780.1300.7466.1.1.15,6.1.1.1726,40
40.1363eabA0.6681.910.0700.9663.6.4.311
50.1312jpnA0.5932.170.1510.8983.6.4.1213,19,29,47
60.1291r1bA0.5372.480.1040.8146.1.1.15,6.1.1.1718
70.0673c90A0.7002.150.0680.8813.6.1.3125,29
80.0661yxbG0.6451.960.0550.7973.6.1.3118,24
90.0601o9iA0.7402.440.0681.0001.11.1.6NA
100.0602a7wK0.6721.870.0540.8143.6.1.31NA
110.0601vp7B0.7082.030.0560.8813.1.11.638
120.0601f7uA0.7172.200.1380.9836.1.1.198
130.0601y0vD0.7332.280.1210.9834.6.1.1NA
140.0602v8tA0.7312.290.0851.0001.11.1.6NA
150.0601hn0A0.7342.100.0341.0004.2.2.20NA
160.0603iayA0.7022.360.1030.9662.7.7.7NA
170.0603e6sF0.7022.570.0510.9831.16.3.1NA
180.0602htnG0.8032.180.0511.0001.16.3.14
190.0601yq3A0.7042.000.0350.9661.3.5.1NA
200.0601eumE0.7072.840.0341.0001.16.3.124
210.0602epoA0.7161.940.0880.9663.2.1.52NA
220.0602ct8A0.6942.400.0681.0006.1.1.105
230.0602fbnA0.7651.800.0700.9665.2.1.88,16
240.0603es3A0.7292.420.1020.9831.16.3.1NA
250.0601r76A0.7002.310.1030.9834.2.2.2NA
260.0601r03A0.7322.360.0510.9831.16.3.111
270.0602f4eA0.3273.430.0740.6445.2.1.8NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.330.5592.870.090.971jigA GO:0005737 GO:0006879 GO:0006950 GO:0008199 GO:0016491 GO:0016722 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
10.270.7812.290.091.003gvyB GO:0004322 GO:0005623 GO:0006826 GO:0006879 GO:0008199 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
20.250.8032.190.051.001bcfA GO:0004322 GO:0005506 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006826 GO:0006879 GO:0006880 GO:0008199 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0042802 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
30.250.8281.410.091.004wzxA GO:0000166 GO:0000407 GO:0004672 GO:0004674 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006468 GO:0006914 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0045879 GO:0045880 GO:0046777 GO:0090398 GO:0097542
40.250.7371.890.051.002cptA GO:0000166 GO:0000920 GO:0000922 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005768 GO:0005813 GO:0005829 GO:0006810 GO:0006813 GO:0006914 GO:0006997 GO:0007032 GO:0007033 GO:0007049 GO:0007080 GO:0008022 GO:0008568 GO:0010008 GO:0010824 GO:0010971 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016197 GO:0016787 GO:0016887 GO:0019058 GO:0019076 GO:0030301 GO:0031122 GO:0031902 GO:0032510 GO:0033993 GO:0036258 GO:0039702 GO:0042623 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0043162 GO:0048524 GO:0050792 GO:0051261 GO:0051301 GO:0060548 GO:0061738 GO:0070062 GO:0090543 GO:0090611 GO:1901673 GO:1902188 GO:1903542 GO:1903543 GO:1903724 GO:1903902 GO:1904903
50.250.6791.800.060.764djgA GO:0003779 GO:0005737 GO:0005856 GO:0007015 GO:0010119
60.230.7862.190.051.003bknA GO:0004322 GO:0005623 GO:0006826 GO:0006879 GO:0008199 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
70.210.6941.280.020.781z0jB GO:0000011 GO:0005768 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006895 GO:0006896 GO:0006897 GO:0007596 GO:0008270 GO:0010008 GO:0010009 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016197 GO:0017137 GO:0031901 GO:0034058 GO:0034498 GO:0043231 GO:0046872 GO:0070062 GO:0090160 GO:1903358
80.200.5592.630.090.972wtlA GO:0004322 GO:0005576 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006826 GO:0006879 GO:0008199 GO:0010039 GO:0016491 GO:0033214 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
90.180.7952.190.051.002fkzA GO:0004322 GO:0005623 GO:0006826 GO:0006879 GO:0008199 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
100.180.7121.340.040.801u7mA
110.180.6741.160.060.731ec5A
120.170.7832.280.071.003fvbA GO:0004322 GO:0005623 GO:0006826 GO:0006879 GO:0008199 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
130.150.8241.360.121.001oxzA GO:0005622 GO:0005654 GO:0005768 GO:0005794 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0010008 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016192 GO:0030131 GO:0043231 GO:0044267 GO:0045732 GO:1901998
140.150.7942.220.101.001jgcA GO:0004322 GO:0005623 GO:0006826 GO:0006879 GO:0008199 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
150.150.7362.420.090.971nf6F GO:0004322 GO:0005623 GO:0006826 GO:0006879 GO:0006880 GO:0008199 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
160.130.6781.430.000.803r2hA GO:0004322 GO:0005623 GO:0006826 GO:0006879 GO:0006880 GO:0008199 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
170.130.6982.450.091.002hz8A
180.130.7752.210.071.004am2A GO:0004322 GO:0005623 GO:0006826 GO:0006879 GO:0008199 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
190.130.6131.530.040.731u7jA
200.120.8062.180.091.004e6kA GO:0004322 GO:0005623 GO:0006826 GO:0006879 GO:0006880 GO:0008199 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
210.120.5583.200.090.974ll8A GO:0000146 GO:0000166 GO:0003774 GO:0003779 GO:0005516 GO:0005524 GO:0005933 GO:0005934 GO:0006810 GO:0007533 GO:0008298 GO:0016459 GO:0031941 GO:0048309 GO:0051015 GO:0051028
220.110.8011.410.190.981yd8G GO:0005622 GO:0005768 GO:0005794 GO:0005802 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0010008 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016192 GO:0030131 GO:0030306 GO:0044267 GO:0045732
230.110.8041.620.091.001wrdA GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0005768 GO:0005769 GO:0005829 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0006897 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016197 GO:0030276 GO:0070062


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0008199 GO:0046906 GO:0016773 GO:0042623 GO:0046983 GO:0004322 GO:0042802 GO:0005524
GO-Score 0.63 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.45 0.44 0.43
Biological Processes GO:0055114 GO:0006464 GO:0006796 GO:0009967 GO:0008589 GO:0033554 GO:0009968 GO:0007569 GO:0051651 GO:0097577 GO:0051301 GO:0046755 GO:0010941 GO:0006511 GO:0045921 GO:0008333 GO:1901992 GO:1903541 GO:0000070 GO:0090169 GO:1903902 GO:0051310 GO:0015918 GO:1902186 GO:0043624 GO:0036257 GO:0032509 GO:0010389 GO:0045184 GO:1903722 GO:0046601 GO:1902751 GO:0007088 GO:0015672 GO:0090307 GO:1904896 GO:0010033 GO:0045920 GO:0006826 GO:0006914
GO-Score 0.63 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.45 0.43
Cellular Component GO:0071944 GO:0044441 GO:0030496 GO:0010008 GO:0005819 GO:0031988 GO:0005770 GO:1903561 GO:0005815 GO:0005829
GO-Score 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.44

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.