[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0822c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.47 18 3tepA ZTP Rep, Mult 225,227,229,231,232,233,256,257,261,263,270,277,348,349,350,353,397,398,400,412,416,423,424,427,428,433,463,474
20.07 3 3telA MN Rep, Mult 233,254,256
30.02 1 2vk6A MG Rep, Mult 276,278

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601sj2A0.3057.810.0420.4811.11.1.6,1.11.1.7NA
20.0602pdaA0.3357.490.0260.5121.2.7.1234,323
30.0602ow6A0.2928.570.0380.4913.2.1.114NA
40.0601itkB0.3067.840.0540.4851.11.1.6,1.11.1.7NA
50.0601rgqB0.1105.680.0420.1453.4.21.98NA
60.0601bxrA0.3747.720.0520.5796.3.5.5NA
70.0601pj6A0.3218.300.0360.5251.5.3.10NA
80.0602q1fA0.3028.320.0400.4974.2.2.21NA
90.0601llwA0.3418.080.0510.5471.4.7.1NA
100.0603ciaA0.3057.710.0290.4753.4.11.-NA
110.0601e7pA0.3038.040.0400.4871.3.99.1412
120.0603ebgA0.3258.340.0530.5343.4.11.-364
130.0601bglA0.3007.660.0390.4613.2.1.23NA
140.0602j5wA0.3378.050.0440.5441.16.3.1NA
150.0601qlaD0.3097.960.0400.4931.3.99.1280
160.0601cu1A0.3098.010.0680.4963.6.1.15NA
170.0601ofdA0.3418.170.0460.5471.4.7.1NA
180.0603iayA0.3048.570.0390.5122.7.7.7NA
190.0602fxhA0.3077.790.0600.4811.11.1.7,1.11.1.6NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.350.4922.580.170.524de8A GO:0006260 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
10.260.3202.610.210.343mejA GO:0005886 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
20.230.2758.210.030.462jkbA GO:0004308 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0052794 GO:0052795 GO:0052796
30.190.3022.890.240.333nroB GO:0016020 GO:0016021
40.150.2912.480.180.313nxhA GO:0005886 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
50.140.3333.670.220.383pe5A GO:0016020 GO:0016021
60.060.3747.720.050.581bxrA GO:0000050 GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0004087 GO:0004088 GO:0005524 GO:0005829 GO:0005951 GO:0006221 GO:0006526 GO:0006807 GO:0008652 GO:0016597 GO:0016874 GO:0019856 GO:0044205 GO:0046872
70.060.3168.260.040.525douD GO:0000050 GO:0000166 GO:0001889 GO:0003824 GO:0004070 GO:0004087 GO:0004088 GO:0004151 GO:0004175 GO:0005509 GO:0005524 GO:0005543 GO:0005634 GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005759 GO:0005980 GO:0006207 GO:0006508 GO:0006526 GO:0006541 GO:0006807 GO:0007494 GO:0008152 GO:0009636 GO:0010043 GO:0014075 GO:0016595 GO:0016874 GO:0019240 GO:0019433 GO:0032094 GO:0032403 GO:0032496 GO:0033762 GO:0034201 GO:0042493 GO:0042594 GO:0042645 GO:0043200 GO:0043234 GO:0044344 GO:0045909 GO:0046209 GO:0046872 GO:0048545 GO:0050667 GO:0051384 GO:0051591 GO:0055081 GO:0060416 GO:0070365 GO:0070409 GO:0071320 GO:0071377 GO:0071400 GO:0071548 GO:0072341
80.060.3058.090.070.493tw6B GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004736 GO:0005524 GO:0006090 GO:0006094 GO:0009374 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
90.060.3088.680.040.525dotA GO:0000050 GO:0000166 GO:0001889 GO:0003824 GO:0004070 GO:0004087 GO:0004088 GO:0004151 GO:0004175 GO:0005509 GO:0005524 GO:0005543 GO:0005634 GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005759 GO:0005980 GO:0006207 GO:0006508 GO:0006526 GO:0006541 GO:0006807 GO:0007494 GO:0008152 GO:0009636 GO:0010043 GO:0014075 GO:0016595 GO:0016874 GO:0019240 GO:0019433 GO:0032094 GO:0032403 GO:0032496 GO:0033762 GO:0034201 GO:0042493 GO:0042594 GO:0042645 GO:0043200 GO:0043234 GO:0044344 GO:0045909 GO:0046209 GO:0046872 GO:0048545 GO:0050667 GO:0051384 GO:0051591 GO:0055081 GO:0060416 GO:0070365 GO:0070409 GO:0071320 GO:0071377 GO:0071400 GO:0071548 GO:0072341
100.060.3028.240.030.493va7A GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0004039 GO:0004075 GO:0004847 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0016874 GO:0043419 GO:0046872
110.060.2587.770.030.403bg5A GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004736 GO:0005524 GO:0006090 GO:0006094 GO:0009374 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
120.060.2268.360.050.383n6rA GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004658 GO:0005524 GO:0016874 GO:0019541 GO:0046872
130.060.2638.130.060.432qf7A GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004736 GO:0005524 GO:0006090 GO:0006094 GO:0009374 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
140.060.2648.310.060.432qf7B GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004736 GO:0005524 GO:0006090 GO:0006094 GO:0009374 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
150.060.2508.400.020.424qslG GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004736 GO:0005524 GO:0006090 GO:0006094 GO:0009374 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
160.060.2498.100.040.403bg5B GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004736 GO:0005524 GO:0006090 GO:0006094 GO:0009374 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
170.060.2378.020.010.384hnvB GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004736 GO:0005524 GO:0006090 GO:0006094 GO:0009374 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
180.060.2568.010.070.413u9sA GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004485 GO:0005524 GO:0008300 GO:0046872 GO:1905202


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0004308
GO-Score 0.47
Biological Processes GO:0006355 GO:0006260
GO-Score 0.37 0.34
Cellular Component GO:0016021 GO:0005886
GO-Score 0.67 0.37

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.