[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0785

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 3 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.52 77 1jrxA FAD Rep, Mult 27,28,29,30,31,32,51,52,53,59,60,61,62,64,65,66,68,187,188,189,236,237,238,264,265,266,273,497,498,526,527,537,544,545,546,547,550
20.12 14 2wp9A NA Rep, Mult 498,499,500,501,526,527,528,529,530
30.07 11 4c3yB ANB Rep, Mult 68,139,311,335,370,537,543,544
40.01 1 5kxjA ASP Rep, Mult 32,526,527,546,547,550

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0991qo8A0.6983.790.1930.8061.3.99.1187,273
20.0901e39A0.6724.300.1950.7991.3.99.1387
30.0901lj1A0.6714.320.1950.7991.3.99.159
40.0891d4cA0.6724.340.1880.8001.3.99.1187,203
50.0672e5vB0.5693.390.1640.6431.4.3.1667,527
60.0602e5vA0.5693.390.1640.6431.4.3.16NA
70.0601fohC0.4095.230.1160.5121.14.13.7523
80.0603cp8A0.4545.450.1120.5781.-.-.-NA
90.0603cn8B0.4225.760.0880.5561.5.3.1728,55,58,60
100.0602gmhA0.4445.190.1590.5601.5.5.128,30,32,56,65,238
110.0601knpA0.5893.700.1960.6731.4.3.16NA
120.0602jbvB0.4825.480.1010.6181.1.3.17NA
130.0601nekA0.5934.080.1800.6961.3.99.1,NA
140.0601vrqB0.4074.730.1250.4951.5.3.1542
150.0601x31B0.4094.660.1290.4961.5.3.160
160.0601kdgB0.4765.780.1250.6181.1.99.18,NA
170.0602gmjA0.4435.200.1650.5601.5.5.1NA
180.0601gpeB0.4715.770.0780.6131.1.3.428,31,526,546
190.0601jnrA0.5655.120.1250.7101.8.99.2NA
200.0601qo8D0.7023.750.1920.8091.3.99.165,67,527,544
210.0601b37B0.4115.620.1170.5341.5.3.15,1.5.3.14NA
220.0601e7pA0.5894.000.1650.6851.3.99.1NA
230.0602yr4A0.4285.920.0580.5711.13.12.928,65,291,547
240.0603cirM0.5313.350.1920.5991.3.99.1NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.400.8211.530.210.844c3xA GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
10.370.6983.600.200.814at0A GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
20.280.6983.790.190.811qo8A GO:0000104 GO:0016491 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
30.260.6724.340.190.801d4cA GO:0000104 GO:0006099 GO:0009061 GO:0016491 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
40.240.6704.320.190.802b7rA GO:0000104 GO:0009055 GO:0009061 GO:0016491 GO:0019645 GO:0030288 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
50.190.6034.100.160.705c2tA GO:0005743 GO:0006099 GO:0008177 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0022900 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
60.120.4744.340.150.562i0zA GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
70.100.3784.500.150.452q7vA GO:0000166 GO:0004791 GO:0005737 GO:0016491 GO:0019430 GO:0055114
80.060.4485.350.130.573nlcA GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
90.060.4025.550.110.523rhaA GO:0016491 GO:0050232 GO:0055114
100.060.4094.910.090.512x3nA GO:0000166 GO:0004497 GO:0016491 GO:0044550 GO:0055114 GO:0071949
110.060.4154.950.160.513oz2A GO:0005886 GO:0006629 GO:0006650 GO:0008654 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016628 GO:0045550 GO:0046467 GO:0050660 GO:0050661 GO:0051287 GO:0055114 GO:0071949
120.060.4035.110.110.504wctA GO:0016491 GO:0055114
130.060.4075.580.100.522vvmA GO:0005777 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
140.060.3995.520.110.513kveA GO:0001716 GO:0005576 GO:0006915 GO:0016491 GO:0019835 GO:0042742 GO:0044179 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
150.060.4005.630.120.511reoA GO:0001716 GO:0005576 GO:0006915 GO:0016491 GO:0019835 GO:0042742 GO:0044179 GO:0055114
160.060.3965.490.120.514a79A GO:0005739 GO:0005740 GO:0005741 GO:0005743 GO:0008131 GO:0009055 GO:0009636 GO:0010044 GO:0010269 GO:0014063 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0021762 GO:0032496 GO:0042420 GO:0042493 GO:0042803 GO:0045471 GO:0045964 GO:0048545 GO:0050660 GO:0050665 GO:0051412 GO:0055114 GO:0070062
170.060.4005.600.120.511f8rA GO:0001716 GO:0005576 GO:0006915 GO:0016491 GO:0019835 GO:0042742 GO:0055114
180.060.3945.560.110.504e0vB GO:0001716 GO:0005576 GO:0006915 GO:0016491 GO:0019835 GO:0042742 GO:0044179 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0000166 GO:0000104 GO:0046872
GO-Score 0.62 0.59 0.59
Biological Processes GO:0009060 GO:0006082 GO:0022904 GO:0044238 GO:0009061
GO-Score 0.51 0.51 0.48 0.44 0.43
Cellular Component GO:0042597 GO:0030313
GO-Score 0.59 0.48

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.