[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0756c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.07 4 1su4A NA Rep, Mult 152,153,154,156
20.06 3 2dyrI PSC Rep, Mult 180,185,188
30.04 2 1af0A CA Rep, Mult 154,155,156,159,169,176
40.04 2 2r9rB PGW Rep, Mult 205,209
50.04 2 1jakA CL Rep, Mult 89,90,93
60.04 2 1fbmD RTL Rep, Mult 199,206
70.02 1 2bbhA DMU Rep, Mult 65,69,72,73,76
80.02 1 2pk0C MG Rep, Mult 89,165
90.02 1 2g9zA MG Rep, Mult 145,149
100.02 1 3sjqC PHU Rep, Mult 213,216
110.02 1 2o01H CLA Rep, Mult 96,100
120.02 1 2wl3A CA Rep, Mult 104,145
130.02 1 3v6iA CA Rep, Mult 135,140
140.02 1 5lskD III Rep, Mult 188,191,195
150.02 1 4ej7B CA Rep, Mult 89,98
160.02 1 2iubD MG Rep, Mult 101,102,104,176
170.02 1 3a2aA CL Rep, Mult 214,217,221
180.02 1 3cfxA MG Rep, Mult 139,145,149

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602pziA0.4065.350.0800.6512.7.11.1NA
20.0602vz9B0.3756.410.0550.6722.3.1.85NA
30.0603b9jJ0.2437.050.0360.4731.17.1.4,1.17.3.2128,143
40.0603g61A0.3615.610.0640.5933.6.3.4454
50.0601h2rL0.3434.950.0220.5061.12.2.1102,106
60.0603b9jI0.2215.660.0560.3651.17.1.4,1.17.3.2NA
70.0602vz8A0.3756.160.0500.6642.3.1.85NA
80.0601ay0A0.3655.330.0590.5772.2.1.1NA
90.0602zj7A0.3575.790.0660.6023.1.1.375,125
100.0601w6jA0.3786.070.0770.6515.4.99.7NA
110.0601eulA0.3225.230.0470.5103.6.3.8NA
120.0603b9jC0.3505.630.0450.5931.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
130.0603btaA0.3766.130.0500.6603.4.24.69NA
140.0602vz8B0.3706.170.0500.6512.3.1.85NA
150.0602wyhA0.3615.770.0700.6103.2.1.24NA
160.0602jfdA0.2665.790.0560.4482.3.1.85NA
170.0602pffA0.3756.120.0510.6602.3.1.41,2.3.1.86NA
180.0602ow6A0.3705.400.0370.5813.2.1.11499
190.0603nztA0.3855.790.0650.6606.3.2.2NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.4935.400.040.793szeA GO:0004175 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009279 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0019867 GO:0042597
10.070.4325.760.060.733ak5A GO:0004175 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009279 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0019867 GO:0042597
20.060.3615.450.040.571dabA GO:0005576 GO:0007155 GO:0009279 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0019867 GO:0042597
30.060.2595.980.060.443h09B GO:0004175 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009279 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0042597
40.060.2636.400.040.495it9g GO:0000747 GO:0001403 GO:0001965 GO:0004871 GO:0005080 GO:0005092 GO:0005737 GO:0007186 GO:0010255 GO:0017148 GO:0022627 GO:0031139 GO:0031954 GO:0032995 GO:0034613 GO:0035556 GO:0043022 GO:0050790 GO:0060733
50.060.2856.060.040.514kkdB GO:0001867 GO:0002376 GO:0004252 GO:0005509 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0006508 GO:0006898 GO:0006956 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0016787 GO:0042803 GO:0045087 GO:0045916 GO:0046872 GO:0048306
60.060.2606.330.060.481tiaA GO:0006629 GO:0016042 GO:0016787
70.060.2855.910.030.483bliA GO:0003824 GO:0003852 GO:0008652 GO:0009082 GO:0009098 GO:0016740 GO:0019752 GO:0046872 GO:0046912
80.060.2976.210.070.544f7kA GO:0005507 GO:0016491 GO:0052716 GO:0055114
90.060.2786.040.010.491gpzA GO:0002376 GO:0004252 GO:0005509 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0006955 GO:0006956 GO:0006958 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0016787 GO:0045087 GO:0070062 GO:0072562
100.060.2845.960.040.481zjkA GO:0001855 GO:0001867 GO:0002376 GO:0004252 GO:0005509 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0006956 GO:0006958 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0016787 GO:0045087 GO:0046872 GO:0048306 GO:0070062
110.060.2375.820.030.402qkdA GO:0000226 GO:0001833 GO:0001834 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0006397 GO:0007275 GO:0008270 GO:0008380 GO:0010628 GO:0015030 GO:0021510 GO:0030154 GO:0030424 GO:0030426 GO:0030576 GO:0030971 GO:0031369 GO:0031641 GO:0032797 GO:0033120 GO:0042023 GO:0042307 GO:0042995 GO:0043025 GO:0043204 GO:0045927 GO:0046872 GO:0048471 GO:0061564 GO:0071364 GO:0071931 GO:0097504 GO:1902742 GO:1990261 GO:2000672
120.060.2735.480.040.442ejbA GO:0003824 GO:0004659 GO:0016740 GO:0051188
130.060.4595.610.080.744om9A GO:0004175 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009279 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0019867 GO:0042597
140.060.4435.680.070.731wxrA GO:0004175 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009279 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0019867 GO:0042597
150.060.2535.240.030.405bpkC GO:0003840 GO:0006749 GO:0032757 GO:0042130 GO:1902807
160.060.4215.680.050.693syjA GO:0004175 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0007155 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009279 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0019867 GO:0042597 GO:0042802
170.060.2346.320.060.432msnA GO:0008152 GO:0016787
180.060.2875.730.080.453h2zA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0008926 GO:0016491 GO:0019594 GO:0050662 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0008236
GO-Score 0.36
Biological Processes GO:0051704 GO:0019538
GO-Score 0.47 0.36
Cellular Component GO:0044462 GO:0030313 GO:0019867 GO:0031224
GO-Score 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.37

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.