[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0755c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 2 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.09 5 1fiqA FES Rep, Mult 393,395,396,397,398,404,409,411
20.04 2 3njbB IOD Rep, Mult 88,89,92
30.04 2 2quaA CA Rep, Mult 418,419,420,421,424,436,441,442,454
40.02 1 1h80A CA Rep, Mult 440,474,476
50.02 1 4b2nA HEM Rep, Mult 238,246,248,249,283,284,285,286,288,291,294,297,298,299,311,313,332,339,427
60.02 1 4b2nA HEM Rep, Mult 299,385,386,389,390,417,423,497,498,499,500,502,511,512,513,520,523,524,637,639
70.02 1 4aljF GLU Rep, Mult 23,346,347
80.02 1 3nw3A MU2 Rep, Mult 360,361
90.02 1 3huzP MG Rep, Mult 542,544
100.02 1 1wygA CA Rep, Mult 448,455,456,457,484
110.02 1 2g38B MN Rep, Mult 150,153,154
120.02 1 1go7P CA Rep, Mult 542,543,544,547,560,561,562,565
130.02 1 3x0oA MN Rep, Mult 138,142
140.02 1 1ktwA CA Rep, Mult 338,374,376
150.02 1 2zj6A CA Rep, Mult 580,582,590,591,594,598
160.02 1 2b9lA UUU Rep, Mult 530,532
170.02 1 4unwB FUL Rep, Mult 352,356
180.02 1 2ckjB FES Rep, Mult 517,518,522,523,525,528,529,636
190.02 1 4iblL FUC Rep, Mult 565,567
200.02 1 2c4dA NAG Rep, Mult 598,603,605,606,629

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603fedA0.3108.340.0440.5123.4.17.21NA
20.0602c1vA0.3114.420.0550.3671.11.1.5NA
30.0601yq2A0.3088.060.0340.5053.2.1.23NA
40.0602z8yD0.3037.850.0590.4871.2.7.4,1.2.99.2440,447
50.0602j5wA0.3148.080.0260.5181.16.3.1NA
60.0601e1cA0.3048.070.0410.4935.4.99.2NA
70.0602r7oA0.3038.460.0360.5162.7.7.48NA
80.0601ofdA0.2968.120.0360.4851.4.7.1NA
90.0601h0hA0.3187.660.0810.5021.2.1.2NA
100.0601vlbA0.3137.800.0500.4911.2.99.7NA
110.0601n1hA0.3387.870.0490.5362.7.7.48476
120.0601ea0A0.3297.840.0330.5271.4.1.13NA
130.0602ivfA0.3108.130.0400.5021.17.99.2341
140.0601l5jA0.3127.990.0250.5074.2.1.329,93,338,342
150.0601bglA0.3117.630.0610.4913.2.1.23NA
160.0602hpiA0.2808.500.0450.4682.7.7.7492
170.0601reqA0.3048.010.0440.4915.4.99.2NA
180.0602eabA0.3217.960.0390.5153.2.1.63NA
190.0602vhdA0.3064.280.0570.3581.11.1.5NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.230.9441.460.080.974b2nA GO:0009055 GO:0020037 GO:0046872
10.060.3337.950.040.542vdcA GO:0003824 GO:0004355 GO:0006537 GO:0006541 GO:0006807 GO:0008152 GO:0008652 GO:0015930 GO:0016491 GO:0016638 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051538 GO:0055114 GO:0097054
20.060.3458.370.070.571llwA GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0006537 GO:0006541 GO:0006807 GO:0008152 GO:0008652 GO:0015930 GO:0016041 GO:0016491 GO:0016638 GO:0019676 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051538 GO:0055114 GO:0097054
30.060.2968.120.040.491ofdA GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0006537 GO:0006541 GO:0006807 GO:0008152 GO:0008652 GO:0015930 GO:0016041 GO:0016491 GO:0016638 GO:0019676 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051538 GO:0055114 GO:0097054
40.060.3297.840.030.531ea0A GO:0003824 GO:0004355 GO:0006537 GO:0006541 GO:0006807 GO:0008152 GO:0008652 GO:0015930 GO:0016491 GO:0016638 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051538 GO:0055114 GO:0097054
50.060.2646.950.060.392cb1A GO:0003824 GO:0016829 GO:0030170
60.060.2717.730.060.433ictA GO:0000166 GO:0003756 GO:0005623 GO:0016491 GO:0045454 GO:0050451 GO:0050660 GO:0050661 GO:0055114
70.060.2487.260.030.381kbiA GO:0003824 GO:0004460 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005758 GO:0005829 GO:0006089 GO:0006626 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070469
80.060.2047.510.050.321sezA GO:0004729 GO:0005739 GO:0006779 GO:0006782 GO:0006783 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
90.060.2237.130.040.341ldcB GO:0003824 GO:0004460 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005758 GO:0005829 GO:0006089 GO:0006626 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070469
100.060.2086.600.060.304dppA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0008652 GO:0008840 GO:0009085 GO:0009089 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0016829 GO:0019877
110.060.2067.070.020.314n02A GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0004452 GO:0005737 GO:0008299 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016853 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070402
120.060.2106.750.060.304hnnF GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0008840 GO:0009089 GO:0016829
130.060.1996.350.050.284q16D GO:0000166 GO:0003952 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0008795 GO:0009435 GO:0016874
140.060.1838.050.020.304a0kA GO:0000082 GO:0000715 GO:0000717 GO:0001701 GO:0005654 GO:0006281 GO:0006283 GO:0006293 GO:0006294 GO:0006295 GO:0006296 GO:0006511 GO:0006974 GO:0007050 GO:0008284 GO:0008285 GO:0016032 GO:0016567 GO:0030097 GO:0030853 GO:0031461 GO:0031464 GO:0031625 GO:0033683 GO:0035019 GO:0042769 GO:0042787 GO:0043161 GO:0051246 GO:0061630 GO:0070911 GO:0080008 GO:0097193 GO:1900087 GO:2000001 GO:2000819
150.060.2467.250.050.371hr6A GO:0003824 GO:0004222 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005759 GO:0006508 GO:0006626 GO:0006627 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0017087 GO:0046872
160.060.2077.480.050.321oc5A GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016162 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0030248
170.060.1806.560.040.264gq0A GO:0001523 GO:0001758 GO:0004033 GO:0005576 GO:0005764 GO:0005829 GO:0006081 GO:0007586 GO:0008202 GO:0016488 GO:0016491 GO:0044597 GO:0044598 GO:0045550 GO:0047718 GO:0055114 GO:0070062
180.060.1756.380.060.254z7rA GO:0006810 GO:0018189


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0051536 GO:0046906 GO:0046872 GO:0003824
GO-Score 0.46 0.46 0.41 0.33
Biological Processes GO:0006520 GO:0006537
GO-Score 0.46 0.46
Cellular Component GO:0005737
GO-Score 0.12

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.