[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0698

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.07 4 4qkoB MG Rep, Mult 10,92
20.05 3 2b4fA XYP Rep, Mult 92,96
30.05 3 1ykpA DHB Rep, Mult 38,40,47
40.03 2 2z48A NGA Rep, Mult 10,11,12,13,32
50.03 2 2z48A NGA Rep, Mult 10,11,33,36
60.03 2 1siwA SF4 Rep, Mult 10,31,32,34,82,83
70.03 2 3e22C MG Rep, Mult 41,44,79
80.03 2 3de8A CA Rep, Mult 22,26
90.02 1 2nvqB DUT Rep, Mult 66,67
100.02 1 1le5E NUC Rep, Mult 24,34,43
110.02 1 2x88A CU Rep, Mult 56,59
120.02 1 1cq1B CA Rep, Mult 45,47
130.02 1 1ev6F III Rep, Mult 88,89
140.02 1 1h1vG CA Rep, Mult 94,194,195
150.02 1 3cg8A O Rep, Mult 62,64,116
160.02 1 2hv8B 2ME Rep, Mult 21,24
170.02 1 2e75G OPC Rep, Mult 89,93

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602nztA0.3325.750.0480.6112.7.1.1NA
20.0603gvjA0.3964.950.0720.6303.2.1.12988
30.0601qhaA0.3935.780.0440.7092.7.1.1NA
40.0601v4tA0.2995.610.0530.5122.7.1.2,2.7.1.1NA
50.0603cn8B0.2765.800.0390.5021.5.3.17NA
60.0601bdgA0.3995.730.0670.7242.7.1.1NA
70.0601vncA0.3975.920.0470.7001.11.1.1096,133
80.0602cb1A0.3905.640.0750.6704.2.99.10NA
90.0603hz6A0.4155.930.0690.7632.7.1.17NA
100.0603bi2B0.3965.410.0260.6851.5.3.11NA
110.0603f9mA0.3126.220.0330.5962.7.1.2NA
120.0602aeyA0.3425.650.0640.6013.2.1.8053
130.0601y4iA0.3955.550.0500.6704.4.1.11126
140.0602zueA0.3885.230.0170.6456.1.1.19NA
150.0601szqA0.3885.690.0830.6804.2.1.79NA
160.0601q16A0.3326.010.0540.6211.7.99.4NA
170.0603cmmC0.3885.790.0230.6906.3.2.19NA
180.0601iq0A0.3885.430.0630.6556.1.1.1910
190.0602vz9B0.3925.970.0580.7192.3.1.85NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.5554.400.090.804kfvA GO:0000139 GO:0005794 GO:0006810 GO:0007030 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0050774
10.070.4814.930.080.784kfwA GO:0005794 GO:0005797 GO:0006996 GO:0007030 GO:0016020 GO:0032580
20.060.4125.840.070.753kzbA GO:0000166 GO:0004856 GO:0005975 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0046835
30.060.3406.100.080.642dpnA GO:0000166 GO:0004370 GO:0005524 GO:0005975 GO:0006071 GO:0006072 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0019563
40.060.3376.170.060.633gbtA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005975 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0046316
50.060.3026.200.010.575cltA GO:0003824 GO:0003844 GO:0004553 GO:0005829 GO:0005975 GO:0005977 GO:0005978 GO:0006091 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0043169 GO:0070062
60.060.3416.240.050.664bc2A GO:0000166 GO:0004856 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005975 GO:0005997 GO:0005998 GO:0006091 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0019640 GO:0042732 GO:0046835 GO:0070062
70.060.4265.870.070.784e1jC GO:0000166 GO:0004370 GO:0005524 GO:0005975 GO:0006071 GO:0006072 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0019563
80.060.3725.870.040.675bsmA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0008152 GO:0009698 GO:0016207 GO:0016874
90.060.3386.060.040.613qbxB GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005975 GO:0006040 GO:0009254 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0097175
100.060.4145.900.080.773h3nO GO:0000166 GO:0004370 GO:0005524 GO:0005975 GO:0006071 GO:0006072 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0019563
110.060.4255.410.060.743i8bA GO:0005975 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0046872
120.060.3296.010.030.612itmA GO:0000166 GO:0004856 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0005997 GO:0005998 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0042732 GO:0042843 GO:0046835
130.060.3305.980.050.603ifrA GO:0004856 GO:0005975 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0046835
140.060.2506.160.020.453ch8A GO:0005102 GO:0005176 GO:0005178 GO:0005200 GO:0005604 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0006605 GO:0007049 GO:0007155 GO:0007165 GO:0007173 GO:0007229 GO:0009925 GO:0016020 GO:0016049 GO:0016323 GO:0030054 GO:0030056 GO:0031965 GO:0032088 GO:0032495 GO:0032496 GO:0038128 GO:0045104 GO:0045175 GO:0045197 GO:0070433 GO:0071356 GO:0071638
150.060.3715.820.040.695huxA GO:0005975 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016773
160.060.2866.310.040.573wxiA GO:0000166 GO:0004370 GO:0005975 GO:0006072 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773
170.060.4045.720.060.743l0qB GO:0005975 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773
180.060.3405.350.050.594ynnA GO:0004252 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0016787


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0036094 GO:1901265 GO:0016772
GO-Score 0.36 0.36 0.36
Biological Processes GO:0006796 GO:0044238
GO-Score 0.36 0.31
Cellular Component GO:0032580 GO:0005797
GO-Score 0.07 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.