[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0689c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.18 3 4nb0A CYS Rep, Mult 38,39,40,82
20.06 1 3hpyB MCT Rep, Mult 36,64,65,71,80
30.06 1 3oxhA PMB Rep, Mult 9,15,62,65
40.06 1 2ei3A BPY Rep, Mult 46,50,54
50.06 1 4x4qA MG Rep, Mult 38,80
60.06 1 2ehzA MCT Rep, Mult 72,77,78,79
70.06 1 3gm50 III Rep, Mult 21,22,39,51,54,73,77

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0673hdpA0.6742.980.0990.9174.4.1.5NA
20.0661jc5B0.6333.690.1310.9525.1.99.1NA
30.0602b3lA0.4894.460.0710.8933.4.11.1870
40.0604matA0.4953.720.0710.8453.4.11.18NA
50.0603dbmA0.5314.300.0860.9524.2.1.9281
60.0603c66A0.4752.490.0490.6312.7.7.19NA
70.0601f9zA0.5432.350.0950.6794.4.1.5NA
80.0601egyA0.5004.300.1070.8691.14.-.-NA
90.0603a4gA0.4994.270.0810.8571.14.13.15NA
100.0601rp5A0.4913.740.0240.7863.4.-.-NA
110.0601sqdA0.4862.950.0960.6671.13.11.2730
120.0602ehzA0.5853.240.1150.9051.13.11.-NA
130.0602q0eA0.4882.660.0480.6552.7.7.52NA
140.0603ecjA0.6033.270.0850.8931.13.11.15NA
150.0601mpyA0.6003.060.0840.8931.13.11.2NA
160.0603dsiA0.5394.020.0740.9414.2.1.92NA
170.0601sqiA0.6143.900.0720.9641.13.11.2743
180.0603lm4D0.6063.030.1050.8691.13.11.255
190.0601f1uA0.5983.310.1100.8931.13.11.15NA
200.0603iw0A0.4944.210.0490.9291.14.-.-NA
210.0602wm4A0.5204.330.0600.9171.14.-.-NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.110.6742.980.100.923hdpA GO:0016829 GO:0046872
10.100.6833.280.100.953r6aB GO:0004462 GO:0016829
20.100.6333.690.130.951jc5B GO:0004493 GO:0016853
30.090.6093.390.160.933zgjB GO:0003868 GO:0009072 GO:0016701 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
40.090.6643.110.230.943oxhA GO:0005886
50.090.6593.160.150.933gm5A GO:0016829
60.070.5993.350.150.923rmuA GO:0004493 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0016853 GO:0019626 GO:0046491 GO:0046872
70.070.6413.580.120.952r5vA GO:0003868 GO:0005506 GO:0009072 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0017000 GO:0033072 GO:0046872 GO:0050585 GO:0055114
80.070.6243.240.170.921t47A GO:0003868 GO:0006559 GO:0006572 GO:0009072 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
90.070.6153.090.170.901sp9B GO:0003868 GO:0005737 GO:0006559 GO:0006572 GO:0009072 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0042802 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
100.070.6343.210.060.923oa4A GO:0046872
110.070.6213.610.100.925d7zA GO:0004462 GO:0016829 GO:0046872
120.070.6203.590.090.945ec3A GO:0003868 GO:0005829 GO:0006559 GO:0006572 GO:0009072 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114 GO:0070062
130.070.4693.430.080.691kmyA GO:0003824 GO:0005506 GO:0006725 GO:0008198 GO:0016491 GO:0018583 GO:0019439 GO:0042178 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
140.070.6103.310.150.891sqiB GO:0000139 GO:0003868 GO:0005737 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0005794 GO:0006559 GO:0006572 GO:0009072 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
150.070.6213.630.090.941cjxA GO:0003868 GO:0006559 GO:0006572 GO:0009072 GO:0016491 GO:0016701 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
160.070.5122.570.110.652p25A
170.070.5192.810.140.683l7tA GO:0004462 GO:0046872
180.070.4992.610.100.673ey7A GO:0003824 GO:0051213 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0043169
GO-Score 0.39
Biological Processes GO:0055114 GO:0009072
GO-Score 0.09 0.09
Cellular Component GO:0005886
GO-Score 0.09

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.