[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0678

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.14 5 3q5fA NUC Rep, Mult 17,52,53,54,64,65,68,82,90,91,92
20.08 2 4nb5B 2JT Rep, Mult 30,77,79,103,104,106,107
30.06 2 2rakA PIB Rep, Mult 38,39,40,49,56
40.06 2 2w6dB CPL Rep, Mult 20,21,23,24,25,40,41,43
50.06 2 3bpxB SAL Rep, Mult 35,39,60,66,67,70
60.06 2 3q5fA NUC Rep, Mult 20,33,35,62,63,65,66,69,88,89,90
70.03 1 4nb5A 2JT Rep, Mult 77,106,107,109,110,113
80.03 1 2wbiB FAD Rep, Mult 30,73,74,78
90.03 1 3rkoL LFA Rep, Mult 24,27,28,70

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603ihyC0.4925.260.0760.8672.7.1.13780
20.0601yisA0.4634.860.0580.7584.3.2.2NA
30.0601khvB0.4704.140.0380.6972.7.7.4864
40.0602ebaA0.4754.540.0440.6851.3.99.7NA
50.0602iukB0.4544.670.0560.7331.13.11.1241
60.0603ilwA0.4674.140.0800.6425.99.1.3NA
70.0601no3A0.4635.310.0470.8361.13.11.12NA
80.0601rx0A0.4714.710.0700.7211.3.99.-NA
90.0601qd1B0.4065.500.0350.7462.1.2.5,4.3.1.4NA
100.0602o6yA0.4805.250.0920.8064.3.1.-NA
110.0602e9fB0.4643.640.0630.6004.3.2.1NA
120.0602p0mA0.4685.320.0830.8301.13.11.33NA
130.0603djlA0.4694.300.0390.6671.3.99.-NA
140.0603czoB0.4705.390.0840.8424.3.1.3NA
150.0601jqiA0.4744.590.0710.7091.3.99.2NA
160.0602x38A0.5075.280.1410.8672.7.1.153NA
170.0603d9dA0.4744.980.0510.7271.7.3.1NA
180.0603kb9A0.4704.870.0600.7704.2.3.3770,81
190.0603mddA0.4734.600.0360.7091.3.99.3119

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.680.8731.220.990.904nb5B GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
10.310.6912.950.130.901ku9A GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
20.190.4012.700.130.483bpxA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
30.110.3983.280.100.482nyxB GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0005886 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0044212
40.070.5844.300.040.872wauA GO:0004872 GO:0009405 GO:0016021 GO:0016337 GO:0020002 GO:0020013 GO:0020030 GO:0020033 GO:0020035 GO:0046789 GO:0050839
50.070.5484.340.030.842y8dA GO:0004872 GO:0009405 GO:0016021
60.070.5674.260.060.842c6jA GO:0004872 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
70.070.5334.510.040.844gf2A GO:0004872 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
80.070.5114.910.060.814p1tA GO:0004872 GO:0009405 GO:0016021
90.070.5624.340.060.824nuuB GO:0004872 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
100.070.5594.430.020.843vuvA GO:0004872 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0042493 GO:0046812 GO:0046872
110.070.5184.320.050.801zroA GO:0004872 GO:0009405 GO:0016021
120.070.4734.370.030.725f3jA GO:0004872 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
130.070.5154.220.060.794k2uA GO:0004872 GO:0008201 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0020009 GO:0030260 GO:0046789
140.070.5114.690.060.853cpzA GO:0004872 GO:0009405 GO:0016021
150.070.4864.470.060.752yk0A GO:0004872 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0046872
160.060.3784.980.080.652y75E GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0042802
170.060.3236.090.070.673qiaA GO:0000166 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0005524 GO:0006314 GO:0006754 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0015991 GO:0015992 GO:0016539 GO:0016787 GO:0016820 GO:0033178 GO:0046034 GO:0090305
180.060.3883.350.060.495cyvB GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0003677 GO:0003700
GO-Score 0.84 0.50
Biological Processes GO:0006355
GO-Score 0.84
Cellular Component GO:0005886 GO:0020002 GO:0016021 GO:0020030
GO-Score 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.