[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0556

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.11 6 4a25A MN Rep, Mult 157,161
20.07 4 6r1rA III Rep, Mult 60,61,62,64,65,67,87,88
30.04 2 3cevA ARG Rep, Mult 32,46,50,72
40.04 2 3g6wA POP Rep, Mult 113,115
50.04 2 1y66B DIO Rep, Mult 56,59,60
60.02 1 4o6mB MPG Rep, Mult 149,150
70.02 1 4rwdB OLA Rep, Mult 52,56,150
80.02 1 3wmnF BCL Rep, Mult 141,145
90.02 1 3r1rC III Rep, Mult 133,136,137,145
100.02 1 3f1f1 MG Rep, Mult 96,97
110.02 1 3t2hE TMO Rep, Mult 60,99
120.02 1 2ou3B I3A Rep, Mult 99,113
130.02 1 1e6aA MN Rep, Mult 112,122
140.02 1 1ugiC IMD Rep, Mult 73,98
150.02 1 3se1A MG Rep, Mult 154,157
160.02 1 1kj4B III Rep, Mult 118,121

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602zxqA0.4415.300.0460.7603.2.1.97NA
20.0602ouyA0.4485.230.0380.7663.1.4.1790,147
30.0603cf4A0.4804.800.0430.8071.2.99.281
40.0601r18A0.4434.770.0490.7312.1.1.77NA
50.0602nvrA0.4515.270.0530.8013.5.1.98NA
60.0601mhyB0.4435.050.0480.7311.14.13.2518,44,149
70.0601hxgA0.4425.580.0440.8014.2.3.9,4.1.99.799
80.0602fpqA0.4553.890.0500.6493.4.24.69NA
90.0601yq2A0.4445.420.0460.8013.2.1.23112
100.0602cqsA0.4564.890.0750.7542.4.1.20NA
110.0601kl7A0.4505.390.0430.8074.2.3.1NA
120.0602z8yP0.4444.930.0400.7432.3.1.16998
130.0602iu4B0.4515.160.0410.7602.7.1.2NA
140.0603lmdA0.4425.150.0660.7542.5.1.3025
150.0602vqjA0.4415.100.0940.7663.5.1.9829
160.0605r1rA0.4515.100.0600.7841.17.4.1NA
170.0601zefA0.4504.770.0750.7253.1.3.1NA
180.0603e2dA0.4494.630.0650.7143.1.3.1NA
190.0601rqiA0.4485.090.0600.7432.5.1.10NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.060.4615.230.070.804dnrA GO:0005215 GO:0005375 GO:0005507 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0006812 GO:0006825 GO:0006878 GO:0008324 GO:0010272 GO:0010273 GO:0015080 GO:0015673 GO:0015679 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0046688 GO:0060003 GO:1902601
10.060.4924.740.070.793aqpA GO:0005622 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0015031 GO:0015450 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0071806
20.060.4785.120.060.803nogA GO:0005215 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0006855 GO:0015238 GO:0015307 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0042493 GO:0042802 GO:0046618
30.060.4904.890.090.804mt1A GO:0005215 GO:0006810 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
40.060.3126.090.040.644iixA GO:0016787 GO:0030153
50.060.3464.900.070.574ni5B GO:0016491 GO:0055114
60.060.3505.440.070.643u0oB GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004756 GO:0005524 GO:0005829 GO:0016260 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0070329
70.060.3775.250.030.674moaA GO:0005102 GO:0006952 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
80.060.3306.050.060.653w9iF GO:0005215 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006855 GO:0015238 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0046677
90.060.3205.970.070.644r86B GO:0005215 GO:0006810 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
100.060.3505.810.050.673c7aA GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0047830 GO:0050662 GO:0055114
110.060.3255.470.060.561zmrA GO:0000166 GO:0004618 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006096 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740
120.060.3175.440.040.583ihtA GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051539
130.060.3205.530.060.572r8bA GO:0016787
140.060.3115.030.070.514l0jA GO:0000746 GO:0003677 GO:0003678 GO:0004386 GO:0005524 GO:0016818 GO:0032508
150.060.4535.200.080.813d9bA GO:0005215 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0006855 GO:0015238 GO:0015307 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0042493 GO:0042802 GO:0046618
160.060.2835.510.050.533axgA GO:0016787
170.060.4755.050.050.802v50D GO:0005215 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006855 GO:0015238 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0046677
180.060.4654.940.060.774k0eA GO:0005215 GO:0006810 GO:0006812 GO:0008324 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0098655


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005507 GO:0015450 GO:0005375 GO:0015080 GO:0015307 GO:0042802 GO:0016787
GO-Score 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06
Biological Processes GO:0051234
GO-Score 0.47
Cellular Component GO:0031224 GO:0071944
GO-Score 0.37 0.36

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.