[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0541c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.06 3 3wakA MN Rep, Mult 122,229,230,231
20.04 2 3tvuC B37 Rep, Mult 167,184,187,188
30.04 2 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 87,215,218
40.04 2 3h0sC B38 Rep, Mult 214,217,218
50.02 1 3h0jC B36 Rep, Mult 189,194,197
60.02 1 3l26B MG Rep, Mult 161,162
70.02 1 5ezmA ZN Rep, Mult 159,336,338
80.02 1 3tv5C RCP Rep, Mult 243,244,247
90.02 1 1rkvB MG Rep, Mult 231,250
100.02 1 3pgqB GY3 Rep, Mult 238,242,267,269
110.02 1 3wajA SO4 Rep, Mult 159,230,273,406
120.02 1 5ezmA DSL Rep, Mult 241,242,245,263,264,267,279,282,283,285,286,382,386
130.02 1 3svlB FMN Rep, Mult 124,173
140.02 1 3lw5L CLA Rep, Mult 221,235
150.02 1 1rwtB CLA Rep, Mult 91,94
160.02 1 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 222,226,355,358,406
170.02 1 3kziX CLA Rep, Mult 273,276
180.02 1 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 274,277,393,394
190.02 1 2wse1 CLA Rep, Mult 79,83
200.02 1 3h0qB B37 Rep, Mult 195,196,197,200

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603cp8A0.3557.040.0480.5791.-.-.-237
20.0603cmjA0.3626.700.0550.5663.2.1.21NA
30.0601ygeA0.3766.760.0320.5861.13.11.12NA
40.0601vncA0.3886.330.0620.5881.11.1.10234
50.0602eabA0.3667.380.0640.6153.2.1.63NA
60.0602zoxA0.3556.980.0530.5753.2.1.21272
70.0603eifA0.3666.910.0680.5843.4.21.110NA
80.0601v03A0.3616.890.0370.5773.2.1.21NA
90.0602p0mA0.3546.840.0390.5501.13.11.33NA
100.0601od0B0.3566.830.0380.5593.2.1.21274
110.0601gonA0.3577.100.0530.5723.2.1.21406
120.0602z1sA0.3587.080.0430.5723.2.1.21269
130.0601dwaM0.3577.030.0370.5793.2.1.147NA
140.0602dgaA0.3616.880.0300.5753.2.1.21NA
150.0601qoxA0.3547.150.0530.5793.2.1.21NA
160.0601uyrA0.3707.190.0350.6066.4.1.2,6.3.4.14268
170.0601tr1D0.3566.710.0510.5593.2.1.21NA
180.0602iukA0.3407.720.0530.6011.13.11.12NA
190.0601gnxA0.3557.140.0580.5723.2.1.21274

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.230.7192.200.130.775f15A GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740
10.070.6374.050.110.783wakA GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
20.070.6113.790.110.733wajA GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
30.070.5774.680.080.743rceA GO:0000287 GO:0004576 GO:0005886 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0018279 GO:0046872
40.060.2597.710.040.451lshA GO:0005319 GO:0006869 GO:0045735
50.060.2767.410.050.463vu1B GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0046872
60.060.2537.280.030.425azaA GO:0004576 GO:0005215 GO:0005363 GO:0006486 GO:0006810 GO:0006974 GO:0008643 GO:0015768 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0030288 GO:0034289 GO:0042597 GO:0042956 GO:0043190 GO:0055052 GO:0060326 GO:1901982 GO:1990060
70.060.2566.060.030.382lgzA GO:0004576 GO:0004579 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0006486 GO:0006487 GO:0008250 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0018279 GO:0043687
80.060.2558.000.050.453wovA GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
90.060.2527.250.040.434j6rG GO:0005198 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0019012 GO:0019031 GO:0019062 GO:0039663 GO:0044174 GO:0044175 GO:0046718 GO:0055036
100.060.2327.180.040.384gklA GO:0003824 GO:0005975
110.060.2517.080.050.424xmpG GO:0005198 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0019012 GO:0019031 GO:0019062 GO:0020002 GO:0033644 GO:0039663 GO:0044174 GO:0044175 GO:0046718 GO:0055036
120.060.2487.130.040.413waiA GO:0004576 GO:0005215 GO:0005363 GO:0006486 GO:0006810 GO:0006974 GO:0008643 GO:0015768 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0030288 GO:0034289 GO:0042597 GO:0042956 GO:0043190 GO:0046872 GO:0055052 GO:0060326 GO:1901982 GO:1990060
130.060.2476.740.060.394v2pB GO:0003824 GO:0004315 GO:0006633 GO:0008152 GO:0016740
140.060.2156.670.070.343oenA GO:0004872 GO:0004970 GO:0004972 GO:0005216 GO:0005234 GO:0005261 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0008328 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016595 GO:0017146 GO:0022843 GO:0030054 GO:0034220 GO:0034765 GO:0035235 GO:0035249 GO:0042165 GO:0045202 GO:0045211 GO:0098655
150.060.2146.620.070.333oekA GO:0004872 GO:0004970 GO:0004972 GO:0005216 GO:0005234 GO:0005261 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0008328 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016595 GO:0017146 GO:0022843 GO:0030054 GO:0034220 GO:0034765 GO:0035235 GO:0035249 GO:0042165 GO:0045202 GO:0045211 GO:0098655
160.060.2125.720.050.311r5aA GO:0016740 GO:0046872
170.060.2586.540.030.402amxA GO:0009168 GO:0019239
180.060.2286.090.030.343aagA GO:0004576 GO:0005886 GO:0006486 GO:0006487 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0043169 GO:0016758
GO-Score 0.39 0.39
Biological Processes GO:0044763 GO:0006464 GO:0043413 GO:0009101
GO-Score 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39
Cellular Component GO:0016021
GO-Score 0.38

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.