[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0513

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.07 4 1xk0A NO Rep, Mult 115,119
20.07 4 3fz5A GTT Rep, Mult 123,124,142,143,144,145
30.03 2 1dgjA FES Rep, Mult 73,74,79,81,82,83,85,88
40.03 2 3kzqE MG Rep, Mult 46,51,74
50.03 2 2oyqA N5P Rep, Mult 48,52,53,128
60.03 2 2zyqB TAR Rep, Mult 16,17
70.03 2 3jcuD CLA Rep, Mult 92,112
80.03 2 2xloA NO Rep, Mult 116,120
90.03 2 5bu7A ZN Rep, Mult 103,107
100.02 1 5ao1A MG Rep, Mult 44,129
110.02 1 1r4wC GSH Rep, Mult 27,127,144,146,147
120.02 1 2wvsA FUF Rep, Mult 118,119,122,135
130.02 1 3p0eC PO4 Rep, Mult 17,81,83,84
140.02 1 1aczA GLC Rep, Mult 112,144
150.02 1 3womA ZN Rep, Mult 91,94
160.02 1 2wsc4 CLA Rep, Mult 138,142

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601j0mA0.4225.540.0610.7584.2.2.12NA
20.0601de5A0.4125.620.0510.7315.3.1.14NA
30.0602vdcA0.4145.860.0620.7581.4.1.13NA
40.0601od2A0.3735.690.0300.6706.3.4.14,6.4.1.2NA
50.0601llwA0.4255.780.0460.7801.4.7.1NA
60.0601bxcD0.4195.500.0560.7535.3.1.5NA
70.0601a0cA0.4545.150.0410.7695.3.1.5NA
80.0601r4wC0.4854.660.0820.7582.5.1.18NA
90.0601s0kA0.3855.850.0580.7253.2.1.18NA
100.0601ofdA0.4265.970.0630.7971.4.7.1NA
110.0603cmmC0.4385.730.0570.7976.3.2.1951,95
120.0601a0eA0.4245.100.0470.7095.3.1.5NA
130.0603iayA0.4285.180.0560.7252.7.7.7NA
140.0601h19A0.4145.880.0710.7973.3.2.64,52,73,76
150.0601yzxB0.4854.720.0890.7532.5.1.18113
160.0602jerD0.4125.360.0110.7033.5.3.12114
170.0601k3iA0.4125.900.0580.7911.1.3.9NA
180.0602zueA0.4235.790.0440.7976.1.1.19NA
190.0601ea0A0.4145.860.0620.7581.4.1.13NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.6423.980.120.903gl5A GO:0015035 GO:0055114
10.070.4924.440.130.782in3A GO:0015035 GO:0055114
20.070.4854.680.090.761r4wA GO:0004364 GO:0004602 GO:0005102 GO:0005622 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005759 GO:0005777 GO:0006749 GO:0015035 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0030855 GO:0043231 GO:0055114 GO:0070062 GO:0098869
30.070.4974.670.080.793kzqA
40.070.4874.730.080.753rpnA GO:0004364 GO:0004602 GO:0005102 GO:0005622 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005759 GO:0005777 GO:0006749 GO:0015035 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0030855 GO:0043231 GO:0055114 GO:0070062 GO:0098869 GO:1901687
50.070.4894.550.040.752imdA GO:0015035 GO:0016853 GO:0018845 GO:0019439 GO:0055114 GO:1901170
60.070.4564.860.060.733fz5C GO:0015035 GO:0016853 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
70.060.3924.620.060.624p3yB GO:0015035 GO:0016853 GO:0042597 GO:0055114
80.060.2786.170.040.541r30B GO:0003824 GO:0004076 GO:0005506 GO:0009102 GO:0016740 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0051539
90.060.3684.860.060.603gykA
100.060.3225.420.050.551vcnA GO:0000166 GO:0003883 GO:0005524 GO:0006221 GO:0006541 GO:0016874 GO:0044210
110.060.3405.020.090.544wkwA GO:0015035 GO:0055114
120.060.3014.950.040.484o7uB GO:0004799 GO:0005737 GO:0006231 GO:0006235 GO:0008168 GO:0009165 GO:0016740 GO:0032259
130.060.3575.260.030.623gmfA GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016853
140.060.3465.980.030.641q2lA GO:0003824 GO:0004222 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0016485 GO:0016787 GO:0030288 GO:0042597 GO:0046872
150.060.2786.120.030.524n83A GO:0004748 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
160.060.2896.270.050.601dusA GO:0008168 GO:0016740 GO:0032259
170.060.2996.390.030.591flcA GO:0001681 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0016787 GO:0016788 GO:0019012 GO:0019031 GO:0019062 GO:0019064 GO:0020002 GO:0033644 GO:0039654 GO:0039663 GO:0046718 GO:0046789 GO:0055036
180.060.2775.130.070.451jzdA GO:0003756 GO:0015035 GO:0030288 GO:0042597 GO:0045454 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0015036
GO-Score 0.48
Biological Processes GO:0044710
GO-Score 0.48
Cellular Component GO:0005743 GO:0070062 GO:0005777 GO:0005759
GO-Score 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.