[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0504c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.21 13 1wlvC COA Rep, Mult 42,58,96,97,98,99,136
20.12 9 2glpA BDE Rep, Mult 48,57,98,99
30.07 5 3kvzB ENV Rep, Mult 33,57,59,60,61,96,99
40.03 2 4rltA FSE Rep, Mult 63,64,67,68,71,89,92,94,128,143,145
50.03 2 2b3m0 III Rep, Mult 17,21,25,26,27,30,31,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,43,47,61,62,64,65,66,68,69,72,73,83,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96
60.01 1 2cyeD COA Rep, Mult 89,90,91,116,117,118,123
70.01 1 3zvwC MG Rep, Mult 137,138
80.01 1 3bwxA CA Rep, Mult 99,102
90.01 1 2q78G MLC Rep, Mult 95,97,137
100.01 1 2glmA SCB Rep, Mult 43,44,45,57,99
110.01 1 2q78D MLC Rep, Mult 67,89,90,122,123
120.01 1 2xemB SSV Rep, Mult 71,72,74,87,110,112,126

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.2771s9cG0.7312.520.1440.8554.2.1.10737,42
20.1421lo8A0.5902.260.0980.6753.1.2.2396,127
30.0962v1oE0.5232.690.0800.6323.1.2.274,96
40.0671u1zB0.5612.890.1850.6934.2.1.-NA
50.0671tbuB0.4692.300.1020.5423.1.2.272,140
60.0671z6bA0.5512.660.1680.6694.2.1.-73
70.0672hx5A0.5522.410.1290.6453.1.2.-NA
80.0661y7uA0.5422.650.0970.6693.1.2.20141,143
90.0662qq2C0.5562.870.1160.6933.1.2.2NA
100.0661mkaA0.5433.460.1010.7234.2.1.6042,57
110.0601pn4C0.5812.250.1210.6814.2.1.-37
120.0602vz9B0.4614.200.0690.7052.3.1.85108
130.0603khpA0.7013.170.1670.8681.-.-.-37,42
140.0602ortA0.4285.050.0490.7291.14.13.39NA
150.0601nosA0.4325.050.0420.7291.14.13.39NA
160.0603b7kC0.5383.230.0660.6813.1.2.194,96
170.0602ownB0.5823.170.0710.7053.1.2.14NA
180.0602vz8B0.4614.230.0690.6992.3.1.85NA
190.0601iq6B0.6622.460.1520.7894.2.1.1737,42
200.0602vkzG0.7102.790.1540.8372.3.1.38,3.1.2.14NA
210.0603d6xB0.5292.710.0780.6454.2.1.-71
220.0603ebfA0.4495.330.0760.7891.14.13.3961
230.0602uutA0.4414.670.0480.7113.6.1.15NA
240.0602cf2C0.5473.480.0940.7352.3.1.8557
250.0602gllA0.5512.900.0890.6934.2.1.-73
260.0603e65B0.4495.270.0760.7831.14.13.39NA
270.0603ir3A0.5862.850.1140.7234.2.1.-NA
280.0602c2iA0.7282.230.2060.8494.2.1.1737,42
290.0602vz8A0.4773.270.0930.6082.3.1.85NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.470.8641.610.410.904rltA GO:0005886 GO:0019171 GO:0040007
10.280.7212.610.170.861q6wC
20.250.6392.920.120.754oobA GO:0004312 GO:0005835 GO:0005886 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0018812 GO:0019171 GO:0055114
30.250.6922.520.160.833exzB
40.240.6822.870.160.835cpgA GO:0004312 GO:0005835 GO:0006633 GO:0016829 GO:0055114
50.240.6792.480.160.824ffuI GO:0016491 GO:0055114
60.200.6622.460.150.791iq6B GO:0004312 GO:0005835 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0016829 GO:0055114
70.170.5862.850.110.723ir3A GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0016829
80.160.6542.070.170.753k67A GO:0004312 GO:0005835 GO:0006633 GO:0055114
90.130.7312.520.140.861s9cG GO:0000038 GO:0001649 GO:0003857 GO:0005102 GO:0005739 GO:0005777 GO:0005778 GO:0005782 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0006699 GO:0008209 GO:0008210 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016508 GO:0016616 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0033540 GO:0033989 GO:0036109 GO:0036111 GO:0036112 GO:0042803 GO:0043231 GO:0044594 GO:0055114 GO:0060009
100.110.7032.730.130.853kh8A
110.100.7013.170.170.873khpA
120.090.6602.870.100.801pn4D GO:0003824 GO:0005777 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0055114
130.080.6552.440.140.761s9cD GO:0000038 GO:0001649 GO:0003857 GO:0005102 GO:0005739 GO:0005777 GO:0005778 GO:0005782 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0006699 GO:0008209 GO:0008210 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016508 GO:0016616 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0033540 GO:0033989 GO:0036109 GO:0036111 GO:0036112 GO:0042803 GO:0043231 GO:0044594 GO:0055114 GO:0060009
140.070.6542.470.150.763omlA GO:0003824 GO:0004300 GO:0005777 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0016829 GO:0033540 GO:0042803 GO:0055114 GO:0080023
150.070.5842.760.130.723khpC
160.070.5812.250.120.681pn4C GO:0003824 GO:0005777 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0055114
170.060.3235.440.030.603kveA GO:0001716 GO:0005576 GO:0006915 GO:0016491 GO:0019835 GO:0042742 GO:0044179 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
180.060.2385.430.060.453nvoA GO:0005385 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0006829 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030001 GO:0046873 GO:0055085 GO:0071577 GO:0098655
190.060.2676.450.010.581reoA GO:0001716 GO:0005576 GO:0006915 GO:0016491 GO:0019835 GO:0042742 GO:0044179 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0019171 GO:0004312
GO-Score 0.60 0.43
Biological Processes GO:0040007 GO:0055114 GO:0006633
GO-Score 0.47 0.43 0.43
Cellular Component GO:0005886 GO:0005835
GO-Score 0.60 0.43

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.