[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0471c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.12 5 1ubxA MG Rep, Mult 85,86,89
20.12 4 4tq4C DMA Rep, Mult 39,81,82,85,89,102,156,161
30.09 3 4tq4D MG Rep, Mult 85,89,95,161
40.07 3 1mkdB MG Rep, Mult 78,86
50.05 2 3qqvA IPE Rep, Mult 41,42,45,46,81,103
60.02 1 2wsc2 CLA Rep, Mult 39,147
70.02 1 3n5hF GO0 Rep, Mult 14,17,31,35,40
80.02 1 4dz4A UNK Rep, Mult 95,112
90.02 1 1d4m1 MYR Rep, Mult 93,95

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602ewgA0.6123.840.0470.8952.5.1.1039
20.0602j1pB0.5993.950.1280.9012.5.1.1,2.5.1.10,2.5.1.29NA
30.0601wmwA0.6043.920.1040.8892.5.1.-39
40.0601di1A0.5603.760.0710.7844.2.3.9NA
50.0602oa6D0.5874.160.0930.8764.2.3.9NA
60.0602f8zF0.6253.930.0590.9012.5.1.10,2.5.1.151,136
70.0601hxgA0.6033.850.0590.8704.2.3.9,4.1.99.746
80.0602azkA0.6033.890.0610.8462.5.1.1,2.5.1.29,2.5.1.10NA
90.0601hm7A0.5423.740.1200.7654.2.3.7,4.6.1.5NA
100.0605coxA0.4974.830.0400.8021.14.99.1NA
110.0603b8eC0.4924.310.0790.7843.6.3.980
120.0603lmdA0.6103.750.0730.8582.5.1.30NA
130.0601prhA0.5024.930.0470.8151.14.99.1NA
140.0602ftzA0.5684.000.0800.8522.5.1.10NA
150.0603m9uA0.6173.990.0660.9072.5.1.1076,131,133
160.0602h8oA0.6033.940.0950.8892.5.1.10NA
170.0602azjA0.6093.870.0750.8522.5.1.139
180.0603npkA0.5784.120.0630.8892.5.1.10NA
190.0601rqiA0.6183.350.0820.8152.5.1.10NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.320.6123.840.050.902ewgA GO:0008299 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
10.310.6023.890.070.861n1zA GO:0000287 GO:0008152 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0010333 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0046211 GO:0046872 GO:0047926
20.280.6253.990.050.921fpsA GO:0004161 GO:0004337 GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006694 GO:0006695 GO:0008202 GO:0008203 GO:0008299 GO:0016126 GO:0016740 GO:0033384 GO:0045337 GO:0046872
30.280.6133.940.030.902o1oA GO:0008299 GO:0016740
40.240.6143.760.080.863p5rA GO:0000287 GO:0008152 GO:0010333 GO:0016829 GO:0042617 GO:0046872 GO:0050553
50.120.6043.890.050.882ongA GO:0000287 GO:0008152 GO:0010333 GO:0016829 GO:0046872
60.090.6283.490.050.863s9vB GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0010333 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0046872 GO:0050554 GO:0050559
70.090.6951.830.130.774tq4D GO:0004659 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
80.080.6244.110.050.934dxjA GO:0008299 GO:0016740
90.070.6043.920.100.891wmwA GO:0004311 GO:0008299 GO:0016740 GO:0033386
100.070.6393.650.070.883saeA GO:0000287 GO:0005737 GO:0008152 GO:0010333 GO:0016829 GO:0046872 GO:0052681
110.070.5943.860.080.833rmgA GO:0008299 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740
120.070.6231.400.110.674tq6A GO:0004659 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
130.070.5994.060.060.913ucaA GO:0004337 GO:0008299 GO:0016740 GO:0045337
140.070.6013.760.070.863n0fA GO:0000287 GO:0008152 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0010333 GO:0016829 GO:0034009 GO:0046872
150.070.5993.980.080.875c05B GO:0000287 GO:0008152 GO:0010333 GO:0016829 GO:0046872
160.070.6253.910.060.904demF GO:0004161 GO:0004337 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006629 GO:0006694 GO:0006695 GO:0008202 GO:0008203 GO:0008299 GO:0016032 GO:0016126 GO:0016740 GO:0033384 GO:0044822 GO:0045337 GO:0046872
170.070.6154.030.050.924jzbA GO:0004161 GO:0004337 GO:0005737 GO:0005783 GO:0005829 GO:0006695 GO:0008299 GO:0016740 GO:0045337 GO:0046872
180.070.6093.810.060.885dhiA GO:0000287 GO:0005737 GO:0008152 GO:0010333 GO:0016114 GO:0016829 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0004659 GO:0010333 GO:0000287 GO:0047926
GO-Score 0.56 0.47 0.47 0.31
Biological Processes GO:0016126 GO:0045338 GO:0008654 GO:0033383 GO:1902653 GO:0042616 GO:0016102 GO:0046211
GO-Score 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.47 0.47 0.31
Cellular Component GO:0009507
GO-Score 0.31

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.