[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0461

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 4 3ehbB HEA Rep, Mult 113,149
20.08 4 2e76A CLA Rep, Mult 149,156
30.06 3 3glnA XE Rep, Mult 78,79,95
40.04 2 3hb3A CA Rep, Mult 83,86,88,90,92
50.04 2 3zvmA MG Rep, Mult 93,103
60.02 1 1xmeC HAS Rep, Mult 108,112
70.02 1 4zbiB 4M6 Rep, Mult 76,79,83,96,98,99,108,112,115,116,142
80.02 1 2h8pC GOA Rep, Mult 157,158
90.02 1 3aoeD LEU Rep, Mult 78,81,82,83,86
100.02 1 3klzB FMT Rep, Mult 135,137
110.02 1 2q69A CA Rep, Mult 119,120,121
120.02 1 3k7tA GP7 Rep, Mult 28,29
130.02 1 2xtvA MC3 Rep, Mult 74,78
140.02 1 4ub8h CLA Rep, Mult 141,144
150.02 1 2o012 CLA Rep, Mult 91,92
160.02 1 1ucgA MN Rep, Mult 100,104

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603hf1B0.4694.950.0610.7761.17.4.1NA
20.0601j0hA0.4645.520.0420.8223.2.1.13598
30.0601z45A0.4605.320.0660.8105.1.3.2,5.1.3.3101
40.0603etdA0.4705.210.0870.8221.4.1.3143
50.0602z8yP0.4704.660.0360.7472.3.1.16931,58,118
60.0601j0kA0.4655.670.0540.8393.2.1.135147
70.0602nvrA0.4665.300.0820.7823.5.1.98103,105
80.0602occN0.4744.890.0880.7591.9.3.1146,155,165
90.0601euzF0.4675.070.0480.7641.4.1.3NA
100.0602pulA0.5144.680.0310.8282.7.1.100NA
110.0601bvzA0.4555.640.0710.8163.2.1.13592
120.0601ah7A0.4764.030.0580.6843.1.4.3NA
130.0603fvyA0.4715.440.0700.8513.4.14.4NA
140.0603k92A0.4845.000.0610.7761.4.1.251,111
150.0601jk0A0.4675.140.0680.8101.17.4.1NA
160.0602dqbA0.4484.230.0550.6953.1.5.1119,139
170.0603l4uA0.4615.400.0610.8283.2.1.20,3.2.1.3NA
180.0601ea9C0.4635.440.0670.8103.2.1.54NA
190.0601gaxA0.4684.660.0400.7246.1.1.9NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.190.8542.010.160.974mfjA GO:0016757
10.070.5144.680.030.832pulA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0008652 GO:0009086 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0019284 GO:0019509 GO:0046522
20.070.5094.740.050.842pywA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005829 GO:0008652 GO:0009086 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0019509 GO:0042802 GO:0046522 GO:0071281 GO:0071369 GO:0071732
30.070.4984.780.040.774av3B GO:0000287 GO:0004427 GO:0005509 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0006814 GO:0009678 GO:0015081 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0030955 GO:0035725 GO:0042803 GO:0046872
40.070.4974.900.070.804av6A GO:0000287 GO:0004427 GO:0005509 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0006814 GO:0009678 GO:0015081 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0030955 GO:0035725 GO:0042803 GO:0046872
50.070.4385.120.070.714a01A GO:0004427 GO:0005773 GO:0005774 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0009678 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0055085
60.060.4315.130.060.762ig7B GO:0000166 GO:0004103 GO:0004305 GO:0005524 GO:0005829 GO:0006629 GO:0006646 GO:0006656 GO:0006657 GO:0008654 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0046474
70.060.3785.240.080.653f7wA
80.060.3804.390.060.573l0iC GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0005085 GO:0005524 GO:0005576 GO:0005622 GO:0006612 GO:0008152 GO:0008289 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0017137 GO:0018117 GO:0018260 GO:0033644 GO:0043087 GO:0043547 GO:0044161 GO:0044162 GO:0044600 GO:0070273 GO:0070733
90.060.3555.520.050.622ckpB GO:0000166 GO:0004103 GO:0004104 GO:0004305 GO:0004871 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006580 GO:0006629 GO:0006646 GO:0006656 GO:0006657 GO:0006869 GO:0007165 GO:0008144 GO:0008654 GO:0009636 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0019695 GO:0033265 GO:0042803 GO:1904681
100.060.4345.280.060.753i0oA GO:0000166 GO:0016740
110.060.3774.390.050.574v7oA5 GO:0000502 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005839 GO:0006281 GO:0006974 GO:0010499 GO:0010952 GO:0016504 GO:0034515 GO:0043248 GO:0043486 GO:0061136 GO:0070577 GO:0070628 GO:1990236 GO:1990237
120.060.3126.170.010.605bv7A GO:0004607 GO:0004623 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0006629 GO:0006644 GO:0006656 GO:0008202 GO:0008203 GO:0008374 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0030301 GO:0034186 GO:0034364 GO:0034372 GO:0034375 GO:0034435 GO:0042157 GO:0042158 GO:0042632 GO:0043691 GO:0046470 GO:0046688 GO:0051384 GO:0070062 GO:0090107
130.060.3414.770.060.533hr8A GO:0000150 GO:0000166 GO:0000400 GO:0000730 GO:0003677 GO:0003684 GO:0003690 GO:0003697 GO:0004520 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006259 GO:0006281 GO:0006310 GO:0006312 GO:0006974 GO:0008094 GO:0009432 GO:0010212 GO:0042148
140.060.3794.660.060.593l0mA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0005085 GO:0005524 GO:0005576 GO:0005622 GO:0006612 GO:0008152 GO:0008289 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0017137 GO:0018117 GO:0018260 GO:0033644 GO:0043087 GO:0043547 GO:0044161 GO:0044162 GO:0044600 GO:0070273 GO:0070733
150.060.2545.720.050.471sskA GO:0003723 GO:0019012 GO:0019013 GO:0030430 GO:0044172 GO:0044177 GO:0044220
160.060.3304.810.060.533s6fA GO:0008080
170.060.2013.820.050.291aoyA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0005737 GO:0006310 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006525 GO:0006526 GO:0008652 GO:0034618 GO:0042150 GO:0044212 GO:0051259 GO:2000143
180.060.2363.930.080.341y9oA GO:0003998 GO:0016787


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016740
GO-Score 0.38
Biological Processes GO:0019509 GO:0016310 GO:0015992 GO:0035725 GO:0071369 GO:0019284 GO:0071732 GO:0071281
GO-Score 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Cellular Component GO:0005887 GO:0005829
GO-Score 0.13 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.