[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0459

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 4 3rgdE FE Rep, Mult 20,24
20.06 3 1bpyA MG Rep, Mult 53,55
30.04 2 2ppbM STD Rep, Mult 28,31,87
40.04 2 3lw5K CLA Rep, Mult 14,18
50.04 2 1xrmA ALA Rep, Mult 17,20
60.02 1 8icnA ATP Rep, Mult 33,53,55,114
70.02 1 1zyrM STD Rep, Mult 31,32,33,34,37
80.02 1 3jcuD CLA Rep, Mult 17,56
90.02 1 1rfuF ZN Rep, Mult 88,90
100.02 1 2iuwA FE Rep, Mult 30,37,82
110.02 1 1yklG DHB Rep, Mult 25,26
120.02 1 2ppbC STD Rep, Mult 74,78,81
130.02 1 1oauO III Rep, Mult 87,97
140.02 1 2a6hC STD Rep, Mult 47,52,72
150.02 1 2fvkB ZN Rep, Mult 30,82
160.02 1 2d2a1 III Rep, Mult 43,44,49,95,96,97,98
170.02 1 3nl5A TZE Rep, Mult 41,42

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601ksdA0.3905.020.0590.6693.2.1.488
20.0601vzvA0.3905.350.0540.7063.4.21.97NA
30.0601siqA0.4295.190.0270.7551.3.99.715
40.0601ks8A0.3915.010.0590.6693.2.1.4NA
50.0601euuA0.3975.070.0510.6933.2.1.1844,98
60.0601cvmA0.3945.150.0310.6753.1.3.888
70.0601w0eA0.3735.340.0500.6871.14.13.67,1.14.14.1NA
80.0601vcoA0.3914.720.0150.6326.3.4.2NA
90.0602q9fA0.3915.220.0980.6811.14.13.9839,100
100.0601ltuA0.3885.740.0810.7361.14.16.1NA
110.0602ix6A0.4314.990.0070.7361.3.3.6NA
120.0603hsiB0.3965.640.0380.7242.7.8.87
130.0602ix6E0.4295.120.0200.7551.3.3.617,47
140.0602yyjA0.4134.850.0550.6991.14.13.3NA
150.0601eusA0.4025.000.0440.6813.2.1.18NA
160.0603iydC0.4095.630.0670.7792.7.7.6NA
170.0602d1rA0.3975.030.0350.6931.13.12.7NA
180.0603ikmD0.3885.060.0540.6752.7.7.7NA
190.0603e2tA0.3915.020.0400.6751.14.16.4NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.090.4492.700.170.551nwbA GO:0005198 GO:0005759 GO:0006790 GO:0008198 GO:0016226 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0051539 GO:0097428
10.080.4602.700.140.562apnA GO:0005198 GO:0005506 GO:0005759 GO:0005829 GO:0006790 GO:0008198 GO:0016226 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0051539 GO:0097428
20.070.4213.130.170.531r94A GO:0005198 GO:0005506 GO:0005759 GO:0005829 GO:0006790 GO:0008198 GO:0016226 GO:0034986 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0051539 GO:0097428
30.070.4135.480.030.764ybqB GO:0003044 GO:0005215 GO:0005353 GO:0005355 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0008643 GO:0015755 GO:0015758 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016324 GO:0022857 GO:0022891 GO:0042383 GO:0055085 GO:0070061 GO:0071332 GO:1904659 GO:1990539
40.070.3465.160.050.594zw9A GO:0005215 GO:0005355 GO:0005536 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0005975 GO:0006810 GO:0008643 GO:0015758 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0019852 GO:0022857 GO:0022891 GO:0033300 GO:0055056 GO:0055085 GO:0070062 GO:0070837 GO:1904659
50.060.2765.180.040.473gazA GO:0008270 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
60.060.3525.210.060.644cpdA GO:0000166 GO:0004022 GO:0008270 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
70.060.3535.390.040.642ouiA GO:0005737 GO:0008270 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0050009 GO:0055114
80.060.4263.160.120.552d2aA GO:0005198 GO:0005759 GO:0005829 GO:0006790 GO:0006979 GO:0008198 GO:0016226 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0051539 GO:0097428
90.060.4032.790.180.521x0gC GO:0005198 GO:0016226 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051537
100.060.2875.950.040.554dvjB GO:0008270 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
110.060.3455.830.060.692dphA GO:0000166 GO:0008270 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
120.060.3505.590.070.661pl6A GO:0003939 GO:0005615 GO:0005739 GO:0005829 GO:0005929 GO:0006006 GO:0006060 GO:0006062 GO:0006970 GO:0008270 GO:0009725 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0019640 GO:0030246 GO:0030317 GO:0031514 GO:0031667 GO:0031966 GO:0042493 GO:0042802 GO:0042995 GO:0046370 GO:0046526 GO:0046686 GO:0046688 GO:0046872 GO:0051160 GO:0051164 GO:0051287 GO:0055114 GO:0070062
130.060.3165.840.010.634yb9D GO:0003044 GO:0005215 GO:0005353 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0008643 GO:0009750 GO:0015755 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016324 GO:0022857 GO:0022891 GO:0042383 GO:0055085 GO:0070061 GO:0071332 GO:1990539
140.060.2955.740.040.562eerB GO:0004022 GO:0008270 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
150.060.3825.390.060.684ja4A GO:0005215 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0008643 GO:0015293 GO:0015519 GO:0015753 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0022857 GO:0022891 GO:0055085
160.060.2615.960.050.531piwA GO:0006066 GO:0006081 GO:0008106 GO:0008270 GO:0016491 GO:0033833 GO:0033845 GO:0033859 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
170.060.3784.940.070.641cdoA GO:0004022 GO:0005737 GO:0008270 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
180.060.3635.190.080.643cosD GO:0001523 GO:0003960 GO:0004022 GO:0004024 GO:0004032 GO:0004745 GO:0005503 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006066 GO:0006067 GO:0006069 GO:0006081 GO:0008270 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0019115 GO:0019841 GO:0035276 GO:0042572 GO:0046164 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114 GO:1901661


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0051540 GO:0005506
GO-Score 0.44 0.44
Biological Processes GO:0006790 GO:0031163 GO:0051188 GO:0051604
GO-Score 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44
Cellular Component GO:0044429 GO:0070013
GO-Score 0.44 0.44

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.