[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0416

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 1 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.12 3 1zud5 III Rep, Mult 7,28,30,31,32,33,38,39,40,42,43,44,60,62,63,64,65,66,67,68
20.07 2 2htm4 III Rep, Mult 6,27,31,32,33,35,38,40,42,60,61,62,63,64
30.06 2 1fm00 III Rep, Mult 5,35,37,38,39,40,58,60,62,63,64
40.03 1 1ybaD AKG Rep, Mult 43,44
50.03 1 2jf5A MG Rep, Mult 1,13
60.03 1 4k7sB ZN Rep, Mult 6,60
70.03 1 1qgwA PEB Rep, Mult 31,32
80.03 1 3qnnA CA Rep, Mult 19,23
90.03 1 1h9sB MOO Rep, Mult 17,21
100.03 1 2j8rB AZI Rep, Mult 65,68
110.03 1 2asqA III Rep, Mult 2,5,9,10,11,12,13,16,20,21,24,25
120.03 1 1m43A UUU Rep, Mult 38,41
130.03 1 1tk3A NAG Rep, Mult 36,37

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602fugU0.6422.460.1560.9411.6.99.524,36
20.0602ckjA0.6552.390.2060.9261.17.1.4,1.17.3.2NA
30.0602jrhA0.6032.750.0780.9262.7.11.2539,45,49,50,58
40.0602o2vA0.5412.940.1500.8682.7.12.244,49,56
50.0601zxiA0.6752.360.0950.9261.2.99.218
60.0601c4aA0.6532.480.1270.9261.12.7.2NA
70.0601ogpA0.6172.730.1190.9261.8.3.1NA
80.0601sb3C0.6692.410.1110.9261.3.99.2021
90.0601qlaE0.5982.730.1560.9411.3.99.1NA
100.0601zoyB0.6342.600.1270.9261.3.5.155
110.0603it6B0.5413.710.1470.9562.3.1.1,2.3.1.3526
120.0601ffvD0.5882.860.1610.8971.2.99.2NA
130.0601fo4A0.6722.310.2060.9261.17.1.4NA
140.0601nyqB0.6212.320.1450.9126.1.1.354
150.0602nptD0.5962.350.0520.8532.7.11.2549
160.0602e1qA0.6732.380.2060.9261.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
170.0601ogpE0.6182.730.1190.9261.8.3.1NA
180.0602wqtT0.5323.340.0770.8384.2.1.8026
190.0601v8cA0.6472.340.1770.8824.2.3.1NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.420.7671.750.230.941f0zA GO:0000166 GO:0009228 GO:0009229
10.310.7532.210.230.972m19A GO:0000166
20.250.6472.340.180.881v8cA GO:0004795
30.240.6991.880.240.871vjkA GO:0006777
40.210.7482.460.230.971wgkA GO:0002098 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0008033 GO:0016783 GO:0032447 GO:0034227 GO:0070062
50.200.6372.020.120.873hvzA GO:0008152 GO:0015969 GO:0016597
60.190.7861.610.250.941tygB GO:0000166 GO:0009228 GO:0009229
70.190.6422.500.140.903dwgC GO:0005829 GO:0006535 GO:0008652 GO:0019344 GO:0043234
80.180.6372.310.180.902kmmA GO:0008152 GO:0015969 GO:0016597 GO:0016787
90.140.6312.660.150.961v2yA GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005681 GO:0005689 GO:0005737 GO:0006397 GO:0008380 GO:0045171
100.140.7022.060.150.871fm0D GO:0000166 GO:0005829 GO:0006777
110.130.6961.840.230.913po0A GO:0000166 GO:0031386 GO:0032446
120.110.7091.710.110.904idiA GO:0002098 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0008033 GO:0032447 GO:0034227
130.110.6932.610.210.972ax5A GO:0001403 GO:0002098 GO:0002143 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0007114 GO:0008033 GO:0016783 GO:0031386 GO:0032447 GO:0034227 GO:0034599 GO:0042803
140.100.6602.670.180.962k9xA GO:0002098 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0008033 GO:0032447 GO:0034227
150.100.5842.590.090.853rd2A GO:0001816 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0016925 GO:0031386 GO:0045944
160.090.6432.180.120.844wwmA GO:0005737 GO:0034227
170.060.4173.950.050.814a62A GO:0030541
180.060.3134.270.040.712oqzA GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787
190.060.3284.220.050.741l0lF GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005750 GO:0006122 GO:0008121 GO:0009060 GO:0016020 GO:0034551 GO:0055114 GO:0070469 GO:1902600
200.060.3253.880.070.632a00A GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0005524 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0006813 GO:0008556 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0043231 GO:0046872 GO:0071805
210.060.3234.130.020.681o4sB GO:0003824 GO:0004069 GO:0005737 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0030170 GO:0080130


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0000166 GO:0016838 GO:0016782
GO-Score 0.60 0.50 0.42
Biological Processes GO:0019720 GO:0002097 GO:0032446 GO:0009229 GO:0009228
GO-Score 0.48 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42
Cellular Component GO:0044444 GO:1903561 GO:0031988
GO-Score 0.42 0.42 0.42

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.