[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0398c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.07 4 3dd5E DEP Rep, Mult 41,42,80,83,122,123,130
20.06 3 4pseA C11 Rep, Mult 10,14,42,83,184
30.04 2 3aioC MPD Rep, Mult 13,14,51,53,186
40.04 2 2muwB 3LW Rep, Mult 193,196
50.04 2 2cixA MAN Rep, Mult 192,201,202
60.04 2 1dxoA DQN Rep, Mult 154,191
70.02 1 1xzcA PMB Rep, Mult 98,102,144,146
80.02 1 2c1dA ZN Rep, Mult 73,76
90.02 1 3o72C OXY Rep, Mult 125,179
100.02 1 1xzbA MAC Rep, Mult 11,12,15,45
110.02 1 1izcA MG Rep, Mult 182,195
120.02 1 1x07A MG Rep, Mult 39,155
130.02 1 1yajB SIA Rep, Mult 23,24,46,47
140.02 1 2aj4A MG Rep, Mult 49,141
150.02 1 3dayA UNX Rep, Mult 52,187,188
160.02 1 3qebZ MN Rep, Mult 125,142,144,195
170.02 1 2hrrA SIA Rep, Mult 40,41,46,51,52
180.02 1 2hrqC SUC Rep, Mult 39,40,90,95

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0733esbA0.6243.340.2070.7933.1.1.7476
20.0683dcnA0.6233.170.1520.7753.1.1.7476
30.0661bs9A0.5543.420.1310.7143.1.1.72NA
40.0662czqA0.5473.570.1010.7093.1.1.-42,125
50.0601cleA0.5265.290.0850.8363.1.1.3NA
60.0603gbsA0.6043.280.1600.7613.1.1.74NA
70.0601bu8A0.5374.230.0410.7653.1.1.3NA
80.0601gz7A0.5415.040.0670.8263.1.1.3NA
90.0602pvsB0.5404.010.0460.7563.1.1.3NA
100.0601hplA0.5394.170.0560.7613.1.1.3146
110.0603fakA0.6003.980.0860.8173.1.1.-76
120.0601e5tA0.5664.800.0420.8403.4.21.26125
130.0601ethA0.5493.980.0510.7613.1.1.3NA
140.0601lpsA0.5315.390.0710.8453.1.1.349
150.0601gz7C0.5405.300.0540.8503.1.1.350,121,153
160.0601qozA0.5593.360.1380.7143.1.1.72NA
170.0601r9mB0.5485.110.0800.8453.4.14.5NA
180.0603ga7A0.5804.200.0890.8123.1.1.-NA
190.0602c7bA0.6054.240.1100.8403.1.1.1198
200.0602veoB0.4814.780.0360.7473.1.1.3NA
210.0601orvA0.5234.960.0740.7983.4.14.5NA
220.0602gbcA0.5455.140.0900.8403.4.14.5,3.4.15.540
230.0603g0bB0.5475.120.0800.8453.4.14.542,44

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.130.7312.920.110.884psdA GO:0005576 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0050525 GO:0052689
10.080.5994.370.060.853qh4A GO:0008152 GO:0016787
20.080.6154.470.100.904n5hX GO:0008152 GO:0016787
30.070.6034.200.110.851jkmB GO:0008152 GO:0016787
40.070.6243.340.210.793esbA GO:0005576 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0050525 GO:0052689
50.070.6044.120.100.842c7bA GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0052689
60.070.6323.350.160.815ajhA GO:0005576 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0050525 GO:0052689
70.070.6074.380.060.851lzkA GO:0008152 GO:0016787
80.070.5964.150.100.834v2iA GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0052689
90.070.6043.280.160.763gbsA GO:0005576 GO:0008152 GO:0016042 GO:0016787 GO:0050525 GO:0052689
100.070.6034.210.090.854ou5A GO:0008152 GO:0016787
110.070.6183.260.140.784oyyC GO:0005576 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0050525 GO:0052689
120.070.6233.170.150.773dcnA GO:0005576 GO:0008152 GO:0009405 GO:0016787 GO:0050525 GO:0052689
130.070.5924.270.130.833aikA GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0042802 GO:0052689
140.070.5964.570.100.874wy5A GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0052689
150.070.6003.980.090.823fakA GO:0008152 GO:0016787
160.070.5364.960.080.852o7rA GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0052689
170.070.5994.130.090.843zwqA GO:0008152 GO:0016787
180.070.5724.630.080.843wj2B GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0052689
190.070.5974.400.130.854p9nA GO:0008152 GO:0016787
200.070.5543.420.130.711bs9A GO:0000272 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0030245 GO:0045493 GO:0046555 GO:0052689
210.070.5593.360.140.711qozA GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0030245 GO:0030248 GO:0045493 GO:0046555 GO:0052689


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016788
GO-Score 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0008152
GO-Score 0.36
Cellular Component GO:0005576
GO-Score 0.19

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.