I-TASSER results

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0387c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>protein (244 residues)
MSLLPTLQSFLPPPFDAIPNPIEDLDVLVAAAVAVAAGSLGVSAAQLGEIYRHDVVDEAQ
KAPHCPAESDQTPAGAAGDGDLPEVGGRVTSPPQPPVAALTGYSANIGGLSVPHSWNLPP
AVRQVAAMFPGATPMYMTGSSDGSYAGLAAAGLAGTGLAGLAARGGSAPTPAAAAPAGAG
GAGPAATRPAAQQTPAVPAAAAGSAIPGLPPGLPPGVVANLAATLAAIPGATIIVVPPSP
NANQ

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MSLLPTLQSFLPPPFDAIPNPIEDLDVLVAAAVAVAAGSLGVSAAQLGEIYRHDVVDEAQKAPHCPAESDQTPAGAAGDGDLPEVGGRVTSPPQPPVAALTGYSANIGGLSVPHSWNLPPAVRQVAAMFPGATPMYMTGSSDGSYAGLAAAGLAGTGLAGLAARGGSAPTPAAAAPAGAGGAGPAATRPAAQQTPAVPAAAAGSAIPGLPPGLPPGVVANLAATLAAIPGATIIVVPPSPNANQ
Prediction	CCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHEHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Conf.Score	9866554556888766789887544444445554345777776544566556777888778999998888899999999999998888899999998899999998888899999999999998888899999999999999988888888999999999889999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999998899888899888888899876666899998889
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MSLLPTLQSFLPPPFDAIPNPIEDLDVLVAAAVAVAAGSLGVSAAQLGEIYRHDVVDEAQKAPHCPAESDQTPAGAAGDGDLPEVGGRVTSPPQPPVAALTGYSANIGGLSVPHSWNLPPAVRQVAAMFPGATPMYMTGSSDGSYAGLAAAGLAGTGLAGLAARGGSAPTPAAAAPAGAGGAGPAATRPAAQQTPAVPAAAAGSAIPGLPPGLPPGVVANLAATLAAIPGATIIVVPPSPNANQ
Prediction	6521430451133315213421540200000011212332213123224014442145367244144646644454445553464454344345334462442444233142345342433256134324244233244354321122133415343043034544644444544456466544446444446445445445546245235424443334243424424433331023365478
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Normalized B-facotr

(B-factor is a value to indicate the extent of the inherent thermal mobility of residues/atoms in proteins. In I-TASSER, this value is deduced from threading template proteins from the PDB in combination with the sequence profiles derived from sequence databases. The reported B-factor profile in the figure below corresponds to the normalized B-factor of the target protein, defined by B=(B'-u)/s, where B' is the raw B-factor value, u and s are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the raw B-factors along the sequence. (Click here to read more about predicted normalized B-factor)

Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
Hit

Iden1

Iden2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
Align.

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

Sec.Str
Seq

CCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHEHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
MSLLPTLQSFLPPPFDAIPNPIEDLDVLVAAAVAVAAGSLGVSAAQLGEIYRHDVVDEAQKAPHCPAESDQTPAGAAGDGDLPEVGGRVTSPPQPPVAALTGYSANIGGLSVPHSWNLPPAVRQVAAMFPGATPMYMTGSSDGSYAGLAAAGLAGTGLAGLAARGGSAPTPAAAAPAGAGGAGPAATRPAAQQTPAVPAAAAGSAIPGLPPGLPPGVVANLAATLAAIPGATIIVVPPSPNANQ

2pffB

0.15

1.00

1.26

MUSTER

SERIETTTQFKATHIDFGPGGASGLGVLTHRNKGVRVIVAGTLDINPDDDYGFKQGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

4nl6A

0.05

0.99

1.57

dPPAS

ASFKHALKNGDICETSGKPKTTPKRKPAKKNKSQKKNTAASLQQWKVGDKC---SAIWSEDGCIYPATIASIDFKRETCVVVYTGYGNREEQNLSDLLSPICEVANNIEQNAQENENESQVSTDESENSRSPGNKSDNIKPKSAPWNSFLPPPPPMPGPRLGPGKPGLKFNGPPPPPPPPPPHLLSCWLPPFPSGPPIIPPPPPICPDSLDDADALGSMLISWYMSGYHTGYYMGFRQNQKEGR

1mv3A

0.13

0.08

0.62

1.98

wdPPAS

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DGSPAATPEIRVNHEPEPAGGATPGA--TLPKSPSQLRKGPPVPPPPKHTPSKEVKQEQILSLFEDTFVPEISVTTPSQPAEASEVAGGTQPAAGAQEPGETAASEAASSSLPAVVVETFPATVNGTVEGGSGAGRLDLPPGFMFKV-TATDTDE

2pffB

0.15

1.00

1.87

wMUSTER

GSISERVDCIIRLPVKQFKAPGGASGLGVLTHRNKDGTGVRVIVAGTLDINPDDDYGFKQGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

1mv3A

0.22

0.13

0.59

1.93

wPPAS

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DGSPAATPEIRVNHEPEPAGGAT-PGA--TLPKSPSQLRKGPPVPPPPKHTPSKEVKQEQILSLFEDTFVP---EISVTTPSQPAEASEVAGGTQPAAGAQEPGETAASEAASSSL-----PAVVVETFPATVNGTVEGGSGAGRLDLPPGFTATD

5gaoE

0.23

0.99

2.72

dPPAS2

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA--AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

5gaoE

0.22

1.00

2.17

PPAS

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

2lp4A1

0.16

0.09

0.55

0.79

Env-PPAS

DELLADMEQHLLD-LVPESPDAEQLNAIFRAAHSIKGGAGTFGFTILQETLMENLLDEARRGEM-QLNTDIINLFLETKDIMQEQLDAYKNSEEPDAASFEYICNALRQLALEAKGETPSAVTRLSVVAKSEPQDEQ-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5gaoE

0.23

1.00

1.24

MUSTER

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

5gaoE

0.23

1.00

1.48

dPPAS

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

(a)	Iden1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	Iden2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment.
(e)	Download Align. list the threading program used to identify the template provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates.

Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)

More about C-score

Local structure accuracy of first model

Download Model 1

C-score=-2.75

Estimated TM-score = 0.40±0.13

Estimated RMSD = 12.2±4.4Å

Download Model 2

C-score=-3.76

Download Model 3

C-score=-3.78

Download Model 4

C-score=-4.33

Download Model 5

C-score=-4.28

Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)

Top 10 Identified stuctural analogs in PDB

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov
1	4nl6A	0.921	1.64	0.054	0.984
2	2dvlA	0.423	5.79	0.074	0.697
3	5l43A2	0.421	5.69	0.047	0.693
4	1y7912	0.420	5.61	0.052	0.684
5	3mkhA	0.418	5.84	0.071	0.701
6	5im3A	0.418	5.63	0.036	0.689
7	3mpiA	0.417	5.91	0.082	0.697
8	4irnA	0.416	5.79	0.063	0.693
9	1u8vA	0.414	6.49	0.052	0.746
10	1jqiA	0.413	5.96	0.087	0.697

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)

Ligand binding sites

Rank	C-score	Cluster size	PDB Hit	Lig Name	Download Complex	Ligand Binding Site Residues
1	0.07	4	1izlA	CLA	Rep, Mult	221,222
2	0.05	3	3pfdD	FDA	Rep, Mult	204,205,224,225,228
3	0.05	3	3fbyC	CA	Rep, Mult	24,26,57,59,62,63,64,67
4	0.05	3	4v1fA	BQ1	Rep, Mult	231,232,235
5	0.05	3	5d56A	78M	Rep, Mult	226,227,230
6	0.03	2	2jifD	FAD	Rep, Mult	111,113,120,124,137,237
7	0.03	2	4wzsB	NUC	Rep, Mult	229,231,232
8	0.02	1	3pipA	MG	Rep, Mult	63,73
9	0.02	1	1u8vC	FAD	Rep, Mult	167,169,204,205,207,208
10	0.02	1	3kitP	MG	Rep, Mult	204,209
11	0.02	1	3pfdA	FDA	Rep, Mult	166,175,223,224,227
12	0.02	1	5tglA	HEE	Rep, Mult	104,154
13	0.02	1	2bhwA	CLA	Rep, Mult	151,153
14	0.02	1	1yklG	DHB	Rep, Mult	183,184
15	0.02	1	2ebaE	FAD	Rep, Mult	180,182,184,187,190,215,218
16	0.02	1	4durA	UUU	Rep, Mult	90,92,93
17	0.02	1	1jqiB	FAD	Rep, Mult	113,116,238

	Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
	Download the templates clustering results.
(a)	C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)	Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)	Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)	Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column. Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	EC Number	Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3ii9C	0.406	5.89	0.057	0.693	1.3.99.7	205
2	0.060	2wbiB	0.393	6.44	0.054	0.713	1.3.99.-	212
3	0.060	1siqA	0.412	5.89	0.053	0.697	1.3.99.7	154
4	0.060	1pg3B	0.389	5.98	0.061	0.668	6.2.1.1	221
5	0.060	1rx0A	0.411	5.96	0.067	0.697	1.3.99.-	212
6	0.060	3d9dA	0.418	5.80	0.067	0.697	1.7.3.1	NA
7	0.060	1ukwA	0.408	5.82	0.089	0.689	1.3.99.3	NA
8	0.060	3gpbA	0.389	6.01	0.080	0.672	2.4.1.1	NA
9	0.060	1jqiA	0.413	5.96	0.087	0.697	1.3.99.2	NA
10	0.060	2yyjA	0.399	6.57	0.043	0.734	1.14.13.3	NA
11	0.060	1u8vA	0.414	6.49	0.052	0.746	5.3.3.3	NA
12	0.060	2pm8A	0.389	6.42	0.077	0.721	3.1.1.8	NA
13	0.060	2vdcA	0.391	6.41	0.027	0.705	1.4.1.13	NA
14	0.060	1e1yA	0.332	5.75	0.032	0.541	2.4.1.1	NA
15	0.060	1ivhA	0.411	5.71	0.040	0.676	1.3.99.10	NA
16	0.060	1b41A	0.398	6.32	0.117	0.725	3.1.1.7	NA
17	0.060	2c4mC	0.406	6.07	0.047	0.709	2.4.1.1	NA
18	0.060	1ygpA	0.398	5.77	0.041	0.672	2.4.1.1	NA
19	0.060	1k4yA	0.346	6.46	0.038	0.623	3.1.1.1	NA

(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Rank	Cscore^GO	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	PDB Hit	Associated GO Terms
Homologous GO templates in PDB
0	0.23	0.921	1.64	0.05	0.98	4nl6A	GO:0000245 GO:0000387 GO:0003723 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006353 GO:0006397 GO:0007399 GO:0008380 GO:0015030 GO:0030018 GO:0032797 GO:0034719 GO:0036464 GO:0042802 GO:0043005 GO:0043204 GO:0051170 GO:0097504
1	0.09	0.407	5.82	0.06	0.69	2jbsC	GO:0000166 GO:0004497 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0019439 GO:0050660 GO:0052881 GO:0055114
2	0.07	0.413	5.75	0.06	0.69	3pfdC	GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
3	0.07	0.411	5.85	0.06	0.70	2ebaA	GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
4	0.07	0.390	6.15	0.05	0.69	3oibA	GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
5	0.06	0.352	6.51	0.09	0.65	5iduC	GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
6	0.06	0.415	5.68	0.10	0.68	4m9aB	GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
7	0.06	0.409	5.86	0.08	0.68	4ktoA	GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0008470 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
8	0.06	0.412	5.79	0.06	0.69	3swoA	GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
9	0.06	0.416	5.79	0.06	0.69	4irnA	GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
10	0.06	0.423	5.79	0.07	0.70	2dvlA	GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
11	0.06	0.413	5.96	0.09	0.70	1jqiA	GO:0000062 GO:0003995 GO:0004085 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0031966 GO:0033539 GO:0042594 GO:0046359 GO:0050660 GO:0051289 GO:0051384 GO:0055088 GO:0055114
12	0.06	0.323	5.48	0.09	0.51	4n5fA	GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
13	0.06	0.412	5.83	0.06	0.70	2r0mA	GO:0000062 GO:0003995 GO:0004361 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0006554 GO:0006568 GO:0006637 GO:0008152 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0019395 GO:0033539 GO:0046949 GO:0050660 GO:0052890 GO:0055088 GO:0055114
14	0.06	0.409	5.79	0.08	0.68	2jifA	GO:0000062 GO:0003995 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0008152 GO:0009055 GO:0009083 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0033539 GO:0050660 GO:0052890 GO:0055088 GO:0055114 GO:0070062
15	0.06	0.403	5.87	0.07	0.69	2pg0A	GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
16	0.06	0.405	5.63	0.11	0.68	3r7kA	GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
17	0.06	0.412	5.76	0.07	0.68	4l1fA	GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
18	0.06	0.412	5.89	0.06	0.69	5af7B	GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114

Consensus prediction of GO terms

Molecular Function	GO:0000166	GO:0050662	GO:0005515	GO:0003676	GO:0003824
GO-Score	0.52	0.52	0.45	0.45	0.36
Biological Processes	GO:0044710	GO:0048731	GO:0006351	GO:0000398	GO:0022618	GO:0006913
GO-Score	0.52	0.45	0.45	0.45	0.45	0.45
Cellular Component	GO:0043234	GO:0042995	GO:0035770	GO:0043025	GO:0016604	GO:0031674
GO-Score	0.45	0.45	0.45	0.45	0.45	0.45

(a)	Cscore^GO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)	The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on Cscore^GO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1.	J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2.	J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.	A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.	Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.