[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0378

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 2 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.11 5 2ml3A CA Rep, Mult 16,30,32,45,47,62
20.11 5 1c9uA CA Rep, Mult 2,3,4,6,40
30.07 3 2ml1A CA Rep, Mult 34,35,36,43,63,64,65,70
40.04 2 2ztiA MN Rep, Mult 6,64
50.04 2 3eqnA ZN Rep, Mult 9,67
60.02 1 3nmvB MG Rep, Mult 24,52
70.02 1 1izlB CLA Rep, Mult 41
80.02 1 3svtA NA Rep, Mult 18,27,58
90.02 1 3bbxL MG Rep, Mult 38,39
100.02 1 2vn4A MAN Rep, Mult 60,61
110.02 1 3pk0A CA Rep, Mult 52,54,55

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601rkxC0.3813.910.0290.7404.2.1.45NA
20.0602bfpD0.4643.840.0600.8771.5.1.3328
30.0601kcdA0.4963.250.0480.8363.2.1.158,68
40.0601hxhD0.4683.630.0460.8221.1.1.51NA
50.0602zeaD0.4883.580.0550.8901.1.1.30NA
60.0602p68A0.4874.180.0830.9181.1.1.100NA
70.0601iy8A0.4853.720.1000.8771.1.1.-47
80.0602yz7A0.4653.700.1230.8631.1.1.3068
90.0602ze4A0.4773.800.0450.9043.1.4.4NA
100.0601ae1B0.4903.650.0690.8771.1.1.20668
110.0603ftpA0.4873.460.0680.8631.1.1.100NA
120.0602ztlA0.4893.720.0280.8901.1.1.30NA
130.0601vdzA0.4893.480.0750.8903.6.3.14NA
140.0601w0cA0.5093.900.0550.9861.5.1.33NA
150.0603f9iB0.4893.800.1110.9041.1.1.100NA
160.0601wvgA0.4893.640.0700.9044.2.1.45NA
170.0601p33B0.5134.010.0551.0001.5.1.33,1.1.1.253NA
180.0602fwmX0.4873.640.0820.8771.3.1.28NA
190.0603gvcB0.5053.510.0960.8901.-.-.-68

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.5952.870.100.972zu0A GO:0006979 GO:0016226
10.070.6132.700.150.975awfA GO:0016226 GO:0051539
20.070.5792.860.140.974dn7A GO:0005524 GO:0016226
30.070.5333.120.100.862odlA
40.070.4943.380.080.854rt6A GO:0005576 GO:0006810
50.060.4334.010.150.814i84B GO:0005576 GO:0006810
60.060.3514.150.000.744e5xG GO:0005537 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0030246 GO:0030683 GO:0033644 GO:0039504 GO:0039591 GO:0044165 GO:0044167 GO:0050690
70.060.3044.550.050.672l0dA GO:0004181 GO:0004185 GO:0005509 GO:0005615 GO:0006518 GO:0016485
80.060.3354.310.060.684icqA GO:0004177 GO:0006508 GO:0016787
90.060.3434.920.000.743hjpA GO:0016209 GO:0016491 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
100.060.3714.390.130.813icuA GO:0005737 GO:0005770 GO:0005783 GO:0005794 GO:0005856 GO:0008270 GO:0012505 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016567 GO:0016874 GO:0031647 GO:0042036 GO:0042787 GO:0046872 GO:0048471 GO:0061462 GO:0061630 GO:1904352
110.060.3304.720.070.711fr1A GO:0008800 GO:0016787 GO:0017001 GO:0030288 GO:0046677
120.060.2964.400.090.602fxhA GO:0004096 GO:0004601 GO:0006979 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0042744 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
130.060.3075.200.030.842x6kA GO:0000166 GO:0000421 GO:0005524 GO:0005769 GO:0006897 GO:0006914 GO:0009267 GO:0010506 GO:0016301 GO:0016303 GO:0016310 GO:0016322 GO:0016740 GO:0033227 GO:0034271 GO:0035004 GO:0035005 GO:0035032 GO:0035096 GO:0036092 GO:0045850 GO:0046854 GO:0046934 GO:0048015
140.060.3004.640.030.684tkkA GO:0000287 GO:0003676 GO:0003677 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0006281 GO:0006310 GO:0006974 GO:0008821 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0090305
150.060.2864.780.030.702dwrA GO:0016032 GO:0019012 GO:0019028 GO:0019058 GO:0019062 GO:0039624 GO:0039665 GO:0044165 GO:0044168 GO:0046718
160.060.3853.820.050.751fo1A GO:0000166 GO:0000346 GO:0003723 GO:0003727 GO:0003729 GO:0005487 GO:0005622 GO:0005634 GO:0005643 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006405 GO:0006406 GO:0006810 GO:0016032 GO:0016607 GO:0016973 GO:0042405 GO:0044822 GO:0051028
170.060.3084.000.020.601s9hC GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0006260 GO:0016032 GO:0016787 GO:0019079 GO:0039592 GO:0039645 GO:0039665 GO:0039693 GO:0046718 GO:0060153
180.060.2534.380.040.521wg1A GO:0000166 GO:0000398 GO:0003676 GO:0003723 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0044822


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005524 GO:0051539
GO-Score 0.07 0.07
Biological Processes GO:0006790 GO:0051188 GO:0031163
GO-Score 0.37 0.37 0.37
Cellular Component GO:0005576
GO-Score 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.