I-TASSER results

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0359

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>protein (259 residues)
MSETGQRESVRPSPIFLGLLGLTAVGGALAWLAGETVQPLAYAGVFVMVIAGWLVSLCLH
EFGHAFTAWRFGDHDVAVRGYLTLDPRRYSHPMLSLGLPMLFIALGGIGLPGAAVYVHTW
FMTTARRTLVSLAGPTVNLALAMLLLAATRLLFDPIHAVLWAGVAFLAFLQLTALVLNLL
PIPGLDGYAALEPHLRPETQRALAPAKQFALVFLLVLFLAPTLNGWFFGVVYWLFDLSGV
SHRLAAAGSVLARFWSIWF

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MSETGQRESVRPSPIFLGLLGLTAVGGALAWLAGETVQPLAYAGVFVMVIAGWLVSLCLHEFGHAFTAWRFGDHDVAVRGYLTLDPRRYSHPMLSLGLPMLFIALGGIGLPGAAVYVHTWFMTTARRTLVSLAGPTVNLALAMLLLAATRLLFDPIHAVLWAGVAFLAFLQLTALVLNLLPIPGLDGYAALEPHLRPETQRALAPAKQFALVFLLVLFLAPTLNGWFFGVVYWLFDLSGVSHRLAAAGSVLARFWSIWF
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCEEHCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHC
Conf.Score	9988888776544999999999999999986556666557899999999999999999999999999999899757876886667654346556799999999985555677656577656897554565544479999999999999999976665799999999999999999998578899987899999867999999999989999999999999999999999999999998777899999999999888769
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MSETGQRESVRPSPIFLGLLGLTAVGGALAWLAGETVQPLAYAGVFVMVIAGWLVSLCLHEFGHAFTAWRFGDHDVAVRGYLTLDPRRYSHPMLSLGLPMLFIALGGIGLPGAAVYVHTWFMTTARRTLVSLAGPTVNLALAMLLLAATRLLFDPIHAVLWAGVAFLAFLQLTALVLNLLPIPGLDGYAALEPHLRPETQRALAPAKQFALVFLLVLFLAPTLNGWFFGVVYWLFDLSGVSHRLAAAGSVLARFWSIWF
Prediction	6554454460201122223233333322111233432311323312233333323012212300020032111410433110112213213122123133333333333323320303444244332010002113102331322222221133333330233133323313332331232133220020011012440241033033311220332333333333333323331211313321131023013203435
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Normalized B-facotr

(B-factor is a value to indicate the extent of the inherent thermal mobility of residues/atoms in proteins. In I-TASSER, this value is deduced from threading template proteins from the PDB in combination with the sequence profiles derived from sequence databases. The reported B-factor profile in the figure below corresponds to the normalized B-factor of the target protein, defined by B=(B'-u)/s, where B' is the raw B-factor value, u and s are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the raw B-factors along the sequence. (Click here to read more about predicted normalized B-factor)

Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
Hit

Iden1

Iden2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
Align.

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

Sec.Str
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCEEHCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHC
MSETGQRESVRPSPIFLGLLGLTAVGGALAWLAGETVQPLAYAGVFVMVIAGWLVSLCLHEFGHAFTAWRFGDHDVAVRGYLTLDPRRYSHPMLSLGLPMLFIALGGIGLPGAAVYVHTWFMTTARRTLVSLAGPTVNLALAMLLLAATRLLFDPIHAVLWAGVAFLAFLQLTALVLNLLPIPGLDGYAALEPHLRPETQRALAPAKQFALVFLLVLFLAPTLNGWFFGVVYWLFDLSGVSHRLAAAGSVLARFWSIWF

3b4rA

0.19

0.15

0.81

1.67

MUSTER

FKIMGIP--IELHITFILFLVVIIGLSI-----------MNNSIFWAVLFILLFVSVVLHELGHSYVAKKYGVKI----EKILLLPI------------------------GGVAMMDKI--PKEGELRIGIAGPLVSFIIGIVLLIVSQFFDININGY--PLLYTLSLLNLMLGGFNLIPAFPMDGGRILRAILSKKYLKSTKIAANIGKSLALIMLLFGLLSMNIILILVSLFVYFGAESRVVEVETIFKNI-----

3b4rA

0.19

0.15

0.81

1.44

dPPAS

FKIMGIP--IELHITFILFLVVIIGLSI-----------MNNSIFWAVLFILLFVSVVLHELGHSYVAKKYGVKI----EKILLLPI------------------------GGVAMMD--KIPKEGELRIGIAGPLVSFIIGIVLLIVSQF--FDININGYPLLYTLSLLNLMLGGFNLIPAFPMDGGRILRAILSKKYLKSTKIAANIGKSLALIMLLFGLLSMNIILILVSLFVYFGAESRVVEVETIFKNI-----

3b4rA

0.18

0.15

0.81

2.92

wdPPAS

IRLKIMGIPIELHITFILFLVVIIGLSI-----------MNNSIFWAVLFILLFVSVVLHELGHSYVAKKYGVKIEK----ILLLPI------------------------GGVAMMD--KIPKEGELRIGIAGPLVSFIIGIVLLIVSQFFDININGY--PLLYTLSLLNLMLGGFNLIPAFPMDGGRILRAILSKKYLKSTKIAANIGKSLALIMLLFGLLSMNIILILVSLFVYFGAESRVVEVETIFKNI-----

3b4rA

0.19

0.15

0.81

2.25

wMUSTER

FKIMG--IPIELHITFILFLVVIIGLSI-----------MNNSIFWAVLFILLFVSVVLHELGHSYVAKKYGVKI----EKILLLPI------------------------GGVAMMDKI--PKEGELRIGIAGPLVSFIIGIVLLIVSQFFDININGY--PLLYTLSLLNLMLGGFNLIPAFPMDGGRILRAILSKKYLKSTKIAANIGKSLALIMLLFGLLSMNIILILVSLFVYFGAESRVVEVETIFKNI-----

3b4rA

0.19

0.15

0.81

4.07

wPPAS

FKIMG--IPIELHITFILFLVVIIGLSI-----------MNNSIFWAVLFILLFVSVVLHELGHSYVAKKYGVKIE----KILLLPI------------------------GGVAMMD--KIPKEGELRIGIAGPLVSFIIGIVLLIVSQFF--DININGYPLLYTLSLLNLMLGGFNLIPAFPMDGGRILRAILSKKYLKSTKIAANIGKSLALIMLLFGLLSMNIILILVSLFVYFGAESRVVEVETIFKNI-----

3b4rA

0.19

0.15

0.81

3.70

dPPAS2

FKIMGIP--IELHITFILFLVVIIGLSI-----------MNNSIFWAVLFILLFVSVVLHELGHSYVAKKYGVKI----EKILLLPI------------------------GGVAMMD--KIPKEGELRIGIAGPLVSFIIGIVLLIVSQFFDININGY--PLLYTLSLLNLMLGGFNLIPAFPMDGGRILRAILSKKYLKSTKIAANIGKSLALIMLLFGLLSMNIILILVSLFVYFGAESRVVEVETIFKNI-----

3b4rA

0.19

0.15

0.81

2.76

PPAS

FKIMGIP--IELHITFILFLVVIIGLSI-----------MNNSIFWAVLFILLFVSVVLHELGHSYVAKKYGVKI----EKILLLPI------------------------GGVAMMD--KIPKEGELRIGIAGPLVSFIIGIVLLIVSQFF--DININGYPLLYTLSLLNLMLGGFNLIPAFPMDGGRILRAILSKKYLKSTKIAANIGKSLALIMLLFGLLSMNIILILVSLFVYFGAESRVVEVETIFKNI-----

3b4rA

0.19

0.15

0.81

3.64

Env-PPAS

FKIMGIP--IELHITFILFLVVIIGLSI-----------MNNSIFWAVLFILLFVSVVLHELGHSYVAKKYGVKIE----KILLLPI------------------------GGVAMMDKIP--KEGELRIGIAGPLVSFIIGIVLLIVSQFFD--ININGYPLLYTLSLLNLMLGGFNLIPAFPMDGGRILRAILSKKYLKSTKIAANIGKSLALIMLLFGLLSMNIILILVSLFVYFGAESRVVEVETIFKNI-----

3b4rA1

0.20

0.10

0.52

0.95

MUSTER

FKIMGIP--IELHITFILFLVVIIGLSIM-----------NNSIFWAVLFILLFVSVVLHELGHSYVAKKYGVKI----EKILLLPI------------------------GGVAMMDKI--PKEGELRIGIAGPLVSFIIGIVLLIVSQF--FDININGYPLLYTLSLLNLMLGGFNL--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3b4rA1

0.19

0.10

0.52

0.86

dPPAS

FKIMGIPIELHITFILFLVVIIGLSI-------------MNNSIFWAVLFILLFVSVVLHELGHSYVAKKYGVKI----EKILLLPI------------------------GGVAMMD--KIPKEGELRIGIAGPLVSFIIGIVLLIVSQF--FDININGYPLLYTLSLLNLMLGGFNL--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a)	Iden1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	Iden2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment.
(e)	Download Align. list the threading program used to identify the template provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates.

Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)

More about C-score

Local structure accuracy of first model

Download Model 1

C-score=-0.52

Estimated TM-score = 0.65±0.13

Estimated RMSD = 7.0±4.1Å

Download Model 2

C-score=-1.65

Download Model 3

C-score=-0.97

Download Model 4

C-score=-2.78

Download Model 5

C-score=-1.51

Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)

Top 10 Identified stuctural analogs in PDB

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov
1	3b4rA	0.774	1.36	0.186	0.811
2	4a01A	0.470	5.74	0.073	0.764
3	4av3A	0.459	5.65	0.056	0.710
4	1mhzD	0.449	6.16	0.044	0.761
5	3perA	0.449	4.90	0.052	0.637
6	2yevA	0.447	5.85	0.070	0.761
7	4j05A	0.445	5.49	0.061	0.676
8	4qjyA	0.438	5.52	0.070	0.683
9	3g61A	0.436	5.37	0.052	0.664
10	4c90A	0.429	5.80	0.058	0.676

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)

Ligand binding sites

Rank	C-score	Cluster size	PDB Hit	Lig Name	Download Complex	Ligand Binding Site Residues
1	0.37	4	3b4rA	ZN	Rep, Mult	60,61,64,186
2	0.08	2	1xvgB	BRJ	Rep, Mult	56,57,61,171
3	0.08	2	1xvgA	BRJ	Rep, Mult	59,138,141,142
4	0.04	1	1xvfA	3CL	Rep, Mult	132,172,175,176
5	0.04	1	1mhy1	III	Rep, Mult	59,60,63,64,66,67,68,70,71,76,84
6	0.04	1	1xveA	3BB	Rep, Mult	57,61,62,83
7	0.04	1	3en9B	TBR	Rep, Mult	83,85,114,116

	Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
	Download the templates clustering results.
(a)	C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)	Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)	Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)	Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column. Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	EC Number	Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2h1nA	0.421	5.61	0.053	0.672	3.4.24.-	NA
2	0.060	3en9A	0.427	5.61	0.048	0.649	3.4.24.57	NA
3	0.060	3lomA	0.408	5.01	0.071	0.606	2.5.1.10	54,175
4	0.060	2ewgA	0.409	5.47	0.031	0.641	2.5.1.10	NA
5	0.060	3b8eC	0.425	5.02	0.043	0.629	3.6.3.9	123
6	0.060	1mhsA	0.418	5.18	0.051	0.625	3.6.3.6	NA
7	0.060	1eulA	0.416	5.27	0.063	0.641	3.6.3.8	NA
8	0.060	3g61A	0.436	5.37	0.052	0.664	3.6.3.44	NA
9	0.060	1qleA	0.401	5.43	0.042	0.614	1.9.3.1	NA
10	0.060	1v4eA	0.407	5.29	0.099	0.629	2.5.1.11	87
11	0.060	1fziA	0.446	6.16	0.048	0.757	1.14.13.25	NA
12	0.060	2yr4A	0.411	6.06	0.048	0.714	1.13.12.9	21
13	0.060	3b8eA	0.424	4.93	0.034	0.622	3.6.3.9	NA
14	0.060	2gwdA	0.380	6.27	0.053	0.672	6.3.2.2	NA
15	0.060	2q80A	0.407	5.38	0.044	0.637	2.5.1.29,2.5.1.10,2.5.1.1	NA
16	0.060	1vncA	0.406	6.37	0.049	0.699	1.11.1.10	135
17	0.060	1zklA	0.407	6.00	0.055	0.699	3.1.4.17	NA
18	0.060	1wmwA	0.429	5.14	0.048	0.641	2.5.1.-	NA
19	0.060	1rqiA	0.411	5.45	0.079	0.645	2.5.1.10	NA

(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Rank	Cscore^GO	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	PDB Hit	Associated GO Terms
Homologous GO templates in PDB
0	0.57	0.774	1.36	0.19	0.81	3b4rA	GO:0004222 GO:0005886 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0046872
1	0.07	0.458	4.76	0.08	0.65	4av6A	GO:0000287 GO:0004427 GO:0005509 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0006814 GO:0009678 GO:0015081 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0030955 GO:0035725 GO:0042803 GO:0046872
2	0.07	0.406	5.91	0.04	0.66	3dhiA	GO:0004497 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0019439 GO:0042203 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
3	0.06	0.452	5.33	0.06	0.68	4av3B	GO:0000287 GO:0004427 GO:0005509 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0006814 GO:0009678 GO:0015081 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0030955 GO:0035725 GO:0042803 GO:0046872
4	0.06	0.449	4.90	0.05	0.64	3perA	GO:0016491 GO:0019439 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
5	0.06	0.436	6.40	0.06	0.76	2innA	GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
6	0.06	0.446	6.16	0.05	0.76	1fziA	GO:0004497 GO:0006725 GO:0006730 GO:0015049 GO:0015050 GO:0015947 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
7	0.06	0.448	6.06	0.06	0.75	1mhyD	GO:0004497 GO:0006725 GO:0006730 GO:0015049 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
8	0.06	0.408	5.96	0.05	0.66	2incA	GO:0004497 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
9	0.06	0.335	6.04	0.04	0.57	2wm4A	GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0005886 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006707 GO:0008395 GO:0010430 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0036199 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070402 GO:0097089
10	0.06	0.334	6.44	0.04	0.60	5bv7A	GO:0004607 GO:0004623 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0006629 GO:0006644 GO:0006656 GO:0008202 GO:0008203 GO:0008374 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0030301 GO:0034186 GO:0034364 GO:0034372 GO:0034375 GO:0034435 GO:0042157 GO:0042158 GO:0042632 GO:0043691 GO:0046470 GO:0046688 GO:0051384 GO:0070062 GO:0090107
11	0.06	0.470	5.74	0.07	0.76	4a01A	GO:0004427 GO:0005773 GO:0005774 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0009678 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0055085
12	0.06	0.330	6.10	0.04	0.56	3juvA	GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0005886 GO:0006629 GO:0006694 GO:0006695 GO:0008202 GO:0008203 GO:0008398 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016125 GO:0016126 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0020037 GO:0031090 GO:0033488 GO:0043231 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070988
13	0.06	0.351	5.70	0.04	0.57	4mudD	GO:0005829 GO:0010124
14	0.06	0.306	6.87	0.05	0.59	3dhiB	GO:0004497 GO:0006725 GO:0016491 GO:0016709 GO:0019439 GO:0042203 GO:0055114
15	0.06	0.280	5.75	0.05	0.44	2zsmA	GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0006779 GO:0006782 GO:0008483 GO:0016853 GO:0030170 GO:0033014 GO:0042286
16	0.06	0.298	5.92	0.08	0.50	2rjqA	GO:0004222 GO:0005178 GO:0005576 GO:0005578 GO:0005615 GO:0005788 GO:0006508 GO:0008201 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0022617 GO:0031012 GO:0036066 GO:0042742 GO:0046872 GO:0050840
17	0.06	0.318	5.57	0.03	0.49	3l0mA	GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0005085 GO:0005524 GO:0005576 GO:0005622 GO:0006612 GO:0008152 GO:0008289 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0017137 GO:0018117 GO:0018260 GO:0033644 GO:0043087 GO:0043547 GO:0044161 GO:0044162 GO:0044600 GO:0070273 GO:0070733
18	0.06	0.279	5.50	0.06	0.45	3l0iC	GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0005085 GO:0005524 GO:0005576 GO:0005622 GO:0006612 GO:0008152 GO:0008289 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0017137 GO:0018117 GO:0018260 GO:0033644 GO:0043087 GO:0043547 GO:0044161 GO:0044162 GO:0044600 GO:0070273 GO:0070733

Consensus prediction of GO terms

Molecular Function	GO:0046872	GO:0004222
GO-Score	0.67	0.57
Biological Processes	GO:0006508
GO-Score	0.57
Cellular Component	GO:0005886	GO:0016021
GO-Score	0.63	0.63

(a)	Cscore^GO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)	The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on Cscore^GO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1.	J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2.	J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.	A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.	Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.