[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0309

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.06 3 1xmeC HAS Rep, Mult 4,8
20.04 2 1dgjA FES Rep, Mult 77,78,80,84
30.04 2 3bkfA ZN Rep, Mult 183,193
40.04 2 3kc2B MG Rep, Mult 113,114,118
50.04 2 1l0vO MQ7 Rep, Mult 20,22
60.04 2 4y4vA DAL Rep, Mult 85,88,89,177,178
70.02 1 5fseC HQE Rep, Mult 12,13
80.02 1 1i95K WO2 Rep, Mult 94,98
90.02 1 2zuvA NO3 Rep, Mult 74,75,137,185,196
100.02 1 1s44B GOL Rep, Mult 116,180,182
110.02 1 3fahA GOL Rep, Mult 56,72,73,74
120.02 1 2o014 CLA Rep, Mult 96,100,116
130.02 1 3zk1B DMU Rep, Mult 5,12
140.02 1 1ztzB CB5 Rep, Mult 78,93,94,97
150.02 1 1sijA FES Rep, Mult 80,81,82,83,85,86,87,91,94
160.02 1 3mz8A ZN Rep, Mult 123,183
170.02 1 4w8cB GLY Rep, Mult 57,201
180.02 1 1somA UNX Rep, Mult 48,49,218

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601gpiA0.3335.950.0550.6013.2.1.91NA
20.0601t3qB0.3805.840.0620.6561.3.99.17NA
30.0601l1lA0.4086.020.0490.7431.17.4.2NA
40.0602wj2A0.3865.640.0520.6473.5.1.99187
50.0601c9uB0.3196.130.0620.5831.1.5.2,1.1.99.17NA
60.0602pffB0.4005.810.0950.7162.3.1.8651,112
70.0601t3tA0.3905.980.0370.6886.3.5.3198
80.0601mosA0.3556.010.0520.6332.6.1.16NA
90.0601moqA0.3555.980.0530.6332.6.1.16NA
100.0602wgdA0.3925.790.0320.6932.3.1.41181
110.0602iobB0.3945.710.0290.6703.5.1.78,6.3.1.8123
120.0601h16A0.4046.080.0470.7432.3.1.54NA
130.0603kzuA0.3985.830.0510.6932.3.1.41NA
140.0601dgjA0.4075.580.0320.6791.2.-.-NA
150.0602pflA0.4036.170.0190.7392.3.1.54201
160.0603cjcA0.3115.600.0620.5323.1.21.155,77
170.0603fr8B0.3836.180.0600.7021.1.1.86NA
180.0601s0kA0.3865.550.0280.6473.2.1.18NA
190.0602vkzG0.3815.900.0770.6792.3.1.38,3.1.2.14NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.120.4802.550.090.554xxtA GO:0004180 GO:0006508 GO:0016740 GO:0016787
10.070.6512.500.160.734xzzA GO:0016740
20.070.4592.970.100.544k73A GO:0008360 GO:0009252 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0071555
30.070.4703.050.110.564qr7A GO:0005886 GO:0008360 GO:0009252 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
40.070.4834.040.090.632hklA GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740
50.070.4703.420.100.584jmnA GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008360 GO:0009252 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0018104 GO:0042597 GO:0071555 GO:0071972
60.070.4523.440.090.554lpqA GO:0016740
70.070.4653.430.070.564xvoA GO:0016740
80.070.4572.780.130.535bmqA GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740
90.060.4103.010.080.504a52A GO:0008360 GO:0009252 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0016787 GO:0030435 GO:0031160 GO:0071555
100.060.3526.060.040.634tlvA GO:0003950 GO:0005576 GO:0005886 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0016757
110.060.2796.490.030.562jieA GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008422 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0102483
120.060.2736.680.020.544lzhA GO:0016740
130.060.2696.210.040.504pz0A GO:0008643 GO:0015608 GO:0034219 GO:0043190
140.060.2666.000.040.462ws2A GO:0016740
150.060.2755.990.070.494gf6B GO:0006091 GO:0008218 GO:0018298
160.060.2575.730.050.461lbuA GO:0004180 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0009046 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
170.060.2344.520.000.342ux0A GO:0000082 GO:0000165 GO:0000166 GO:0004672 GO:0004674 GO:0004683 GO:0004723 GO:0005088 GO:0005516 GO:0005524 GO:0005654 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006468 GO:0006470 GO:0006816 GO:0007275 GO:0007399 GO:0014733 GO:0016020 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016529 GO:0016740 GO:0030073 GO:0030154 GO:0030666 GO:0033017 GO:0042803 GO:0043547 GO:0046777 GO:0051259 GO:0051924 GO:0060333 GO:0097481 GO:1900034 GO:1901897
180.060.2315.240.030.371nyeD GO:0004601 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006972 GO:0006979 GO:0016209 GO:0016491 GO:0033194 GO:0051920 GO:0055114 GO:0098869


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016740
GO-Score 0.33
Biological Processes GO:0008360 GO:0071555 GO:0009252 GO:0006508
GO-Score 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12
Cellular Component GO:0005886 GO:0016021
GO-Score 0.07 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.