[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0274

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.49 46 2p7pA MN Rep, Mult 101,152,162
20.03 3 2p7qC GG6 Rep, Mult 99,101,152,162,193
30.02 2 2p7qF GG6 Rep, Mult 99,101,129,135,152,162
40.02 2 3oa4A ZN Rep, Mult 18,66,101,162
50.01 1 2ei3A BPY Rep, Mult 28,32,36,123,155,156
60.01 1 1lqkB PO4 Rep, Mult 101,131,152,162,185
70.01 1 3l7tA ZN Rep, Mult 18,66

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.4091lqkA0.5302.090.2650.6012.5.1.18162
20.3611fa7B0.5512.500.2020.6424.4.1.521,37,39,156,158,162
30.2361npbA0.5272.780.2480.6222.5.1.1838,104,123,156
40.1232c21A0.5412.890.1560.6424.1.1.-NA
50.0931qipB0.5574.020.1880.7314.4.1.5NA
60.0603ivtB0.4145.350.0550.7052.3.3.14NA
70.0602j62A0.4115.930.0580.7623.2.1.52NA
80.0602zi8A0.5723.360.1460.6941.13.11.39NA
90.0603hpvA0.5752.840.1310.6741.13.11.2NA
100.0603ecjA0.5653.170.1130.6741.13.11.15NA
110.0601pj6A0.4115.500.0740.7101.5.3.10NA
120.0601vrqB0.4145.260.0490.7051.5.3.1NA
130.0603lm4D0.5652.900.1120.6631.13.11.220,102,122,124
140.0603c46B0.3376.000.0300.6372.7.7.6NA
150.0601y56B0.4175.430.0680.7101.5.99.8NA
160.0601x31B0.4135.230.0540.7051.5.3.159,65
170.0602p25A0.5562.250.2340.6424.4.1.5NA
180.0601f9zA0.5422.490.1940.6324.4.1.5NA
190.0601f1uA0.5652.930.1190.6631.13.11.15NA
200.0601lqoB0.5262.150.2650.6012.5.1.1838,104,124,156,158
210.0601ikpA0.4145.300.0540.6842.4.2.-NA
220.0601mpyA0.5762.730.1440.6741.13.11.2NA
230.0602uzzB0.4155.400.0450.7101.5.3.-NA
240.0601eilA0.5663.560.1230.7051.13.11.39NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.490.6122.030.280.693l7tA GO:0004462 GO:0046872
10.420.5282.470.250.611r9cA GO:0005737 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
20.400.5422.490.190.631f9zA GO:0004462 GO:0005829 GO:0016151 GO:0016829 GO:0019243 GO:0046872
30.360.5082.840.180.613ey7A GO:0003824 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
40.340.5412.890.160.642c21A GO:0004462 GO:0016829 GO:0046872
50.330.5574.020.190.731qipB GO:0004462 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005975 GO:0006090 GO:0006357 GO:0006749 GO:0008270 GO:0009438 GO:0016829 GO:0030316 GO:0043066 GO:0046872 GO:0070062
60.320.5272.780.250.621npbA GO:0004364 GO:0005737 GO:0016740 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
70.320.5682.510.230.663kolA GO:0004462 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
80.290.5562.250.230.642p25A
90.280.5312.810.250.634jd1B GO:0000287 GO:0004364 GO:0005737 GO:0016740 GO:0016765 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
100.260.5572.530.220.654mtsA GO:0004462 GO:0016829 GO:0046872
110.260.4983.050.170.613hnqA GO:0009405
120.250.5272.860.230.634jh1A GO:0000287 GO:0005737 GO:0016740 GO:0016765 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
130.250.6042.110.200.692rk0A GO:0051213 GO:0055114
140.240.5102.900.180.624hc5D GO:0051213 GO:0055114
150.220.5092.950.150.623rriA GO:0051213 GO:0055114
160.200.5382.730.180.643ct8A GO:0046872
170.190.4652.820.170.583g12B GO:0016829
180.180.5584.020.180.734kykA GO:0004462 GO:0005975 GO:0006357 GO:0006749 GO:0008270 GO:0009438 GO:0016829 GO:0019243 GO:0030316 GO:0043066 GO:0046872 GO:0070062
190.180.5843.120.140.715d7zA GO:0004462 GO:0016829 GO:0046872
200.140.4753.100.140.603bt3A GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0043565
210.120.4842.950.140.601jieA GO:0008144 GO:0046677
220.070.5772.670.170.693oajA GO:0005737 GO:0009636 GO:0016491 GO:0019439 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
230.070.5762.730.140.671mpyA GO:0003824 GO:0006725 GO:0008198 GO:0016491 GO:0018577 GO:0019439 GO:0042203 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
240.070.5442.510.260.642p7pA GO:0005737 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
250.070.5822.580.150.681zswA GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0004462 GO:0016151 GO:0051213
GO-Score 0.80 0.40 0.36
Biological Processes GO:0046677 GO:0019243 GO:0055114
GO-Score 0.41 0.40 0.36
Cellular Component GO:0005829
GO-Score 0.40

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.