[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0268c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.10 5 4evbA ZN Rep, Mult 130,134
20.06 3 3lotA UNL Rep, Mult 25,71,117
30.04 2 2vn9A GVD Rep, Mult 89,112,120,122
40.04 2 1tkoB FE Rep, Mult 134,137
50.04 2 1xsnA MG Rep, Mult 108,110
60.04 2 5i50A NUC Rep, Mult 137,140
70.04 2 4rkuJ CLA Rep, Mult 129,132
80.02 1 3dc7B MG Rep, Mult 93,94
90.02 1 3ecqA CA Rep, Mult 148,152,154,157,165
100.02 1 3kwoA ZN Rep, Mult 127,130
110.02 1 2bflA ZN Rep, Mult 70,116
120.02 1 1a8bA GPE Rep, Mult 117,161
130.02 1 3hc8A MG Rep, Mult 125,127
140.02 1 2a0iA IMD Rep, Mult 101,104,105,116,117

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603czkA0.4105.080.0770.6983.2.1.48NA
20.0601s46A0.4064.900.0580.6982.4.1.4NA
30.0601is2A0.4175.050.0620.7041.3.3.6NA
40.0602zc0A0.4115.060.0440.7042.6.1.44NA
50.0603l4uA0.4055.500.0340.7343.2.1.20,3.2.1.3NA
60.0601j36A0.4164.820.0560.6863.4.15.1129
70.0602akaB0.4135.240.0720.7343.6.5.5NA
80.0601darA0.3895.670.0670.7513.6.5.3NA
90.0601oqzB0.4055.140.0390.6863.5.1.93111
100.0601jqmB0.4135.490.0540.7573.6.5.3NA
110.0601br2A0.3135.840.0610.6043.6.1.32NA
120.0601j38A0.4134.780.0560.6803.4.15.1NA
130.0601iomA0.4075.850.0680.7464.1.3.7NA
140.0601eloA0.4434.910.0820.7343.6.5.3NA
150.0601sy7B0.4355.850.1040.8401.11.1.6NA
160.0603ecqB0.4255.650.0420.7933.2.1.97NA
170.0602ifcC0.4065.300.0710.7222.3.3.1NA
180.0601t3tA0.4085.360.0550.7046.3.5.3NA
190.0602dkiA0.4115.610.0540.7461.14.13.23NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.4264.370.070.663tdhC GO:0000166 GO:0001302 GO:0003824 GO:0004679 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005641 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0005975 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006357 GO:0006468 GO:0007031 GO:0031588 GO:0043539 GO:0045722 GO:0071902
10.070.4454.640.040.703lfzA
20.060.4234.870.040.702ooxE GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005975 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006357 GO:0007165 GO:0016208 GO:0030295 GO:0031588 GO:0032147
30.060.4185.070.040.703ddjA GO:0000166 GO:0003824
40.060.3104.770.040.492v8qE GO:0000166 GO:0004679 GO:0005524 GO:0005654 GO:0006468 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0016208 GO:0019901 GO:0031588 GO:0042304 GO:0043234 GO:0043531 GO:0050790 GO:0051291
50.060.4085.000.010.694qfsC GO:0000166 GO:0004679 GO:0005524 GO:0005654 GO:0006468 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0016208 GO:0019901 GO:0031588 GO:0042304 GO:0043234 GO:0043531 GO:0050790 GO:0051291
60.060.3585.650.040.662qh1B GO:0046872
70.060.4575.470.090.854av6A GO:0000287 GO:0004427 GO:0005509 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0006814 GO:0009678 GO:0015081 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0030955 GO:0035725 GO:0042803 GO:0046872
80.060.3605.430.020.623l0iC GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0005085 GO:0005524 GO:0005576 GO:0005622 GO:0006612 GO:0008152 GO:0008289 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0017137 GO:0018117 GO:0018260 GO:0033644 GO:0043087 GO:0043547 GO:0044161 GO:0044162 GO:0044600 GO:0070273 GO:0070733
90.060.3445.770.040.651b3oB GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003723 GO:0003824 GO:0003938 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005778 GO:0005829 GO:0006164 GO:0006177 GO:0009168 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0046651 GO:0046872 GO:0051289 GO:0055114 GO:0060041 GO:0070062 GO:0071353
100.060.3265.010.030.534z87A GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0003938 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006164 GO:0006177 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
110.060.3415.120.040.583k5pA GO:0004617 GO:0006564 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016597 GO:0016616 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
120.060.3065.940.040.595bv7A GO:0004607 GO:0004623 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0006629 GO:0006644 GO:0006656 GO:0008202 GO:0008203 GO:0008374 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0030301 GO:0034186 GO:0034364 GO:0034372 GO:0034375 GO:0034435 GO:0042157 GO:0042158 GO:0042632 GO:0043691 GO:0046470 GO:0046688 GO:0051384 GO:0070062 GO:0090107
130.060.3204.920.040.531nf7A GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003723 GO:0003824 GO:0003938 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005778 GO:0005829 GO:0006164 GO:0006177 GO:0009168 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0046651 GO:0046872 GO:0051289 GO:0055114 GO:0060041 GO:0070062 GO:0071353
140.060.2945.720.040.562yvxA GO:0000287 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006812 GO:0008324 GO:0015095 GO:0015693 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0042803 GO:0046872 GO:0098655 GO:1903830
150.060.3224.420.070.504esyA GO:0006950
160.060.3044.910.050.505aweA GO:0003824
170.060.3164.320.070.472rifA GO:0000166
180.060.3195.710.040.604dqwA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0003938 GO:0005524 GO:0006164 GO:0006177 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0035639 GO:0032550 GO:0032559
GO-Score 0.36 0.36 0.36
Biological Processes GO:0006357 GO:0007031 GO:0032147 GO:0071902 GO:0045722 GO:0007165 GO:0051291 GO:0001302 GO:0042304
GO-Score 0.13 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Cellular Component GO:1902911 GO:0044424
GO-Score 0.36 0.36

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.