[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0264c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.09 5 5cyhA UUU Rep, Mult 126,133,135,163,164,168,176,178
20.09 5 1kejA CO Rep, Mult 138,140
30.06 3 3r57A N3M Rep, Mult 155,157,158,159,183
40.04 2 1b4bB ARG Rep, Mult 20,48,49,50,51
50.04 2 3hx9A CL Rep, Mult 17,19,34,54
60.02 1 5b3pA CA Rep, Mult 44,46
70.02 1 3va7A URE Rep, Mult 168,170,176,177,178
80.02 1 1ppjA AZI Rep, Mult 102,106,107,143,144,145,146
90.02 1 4f8hA LMD Rep, Mult 33,36
100.02 1 4x64P MG Rep, Mult 181,182
110.02 1 3ue8A 09M Rep, Mult 132,170
120.02 1 2wse1 CLA Rep, Mult 119,128
130.02 1 3hdiB III Rep, Mult 31,35,44,45
140.02 1 3t5tB MG Rep, Mult 22,26
150.02 1 2g9zA MG Rep, Mult 14,22

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602gw2A0.4123.630.0730.5485.2.1.8NA
20.0601ordA0.4095.010.0820.6334.1.1.17NA
30.0601cynA0.4093.710.1170.5485.2.1.8NA
40.0601sqbB0.4184.890.0220.6381.10.2.2NA
50.0603k2cC0.4123.630.0880.5485.2.1.8133
60.0601ak4A0.4163.540.0790.5485.2.1.8133
70.0601istA0.4153.560.1220.5485.2.1.8NA
80.0602he9A0.4123.700.1210.5485.2.1.8NA
90.0603cxhL0.4434.700.0480.6521.10.2.2NA
100.0601h0pA0.4113.750.1150.5525.2.1.8NA
110.0601vncA0.4165.870.0430.7141.11.1.10169
120.0602bitX0.4133.580.1120.5485.2.1.8NA
130.0601iduA0.4145.560.0390.6911.11.1.10NA
140.0601z81A0.4123.810.0780.5575.2.1.8NA
150.0601ezvB0.4334.760.0680.6521.10.2.2NA
160.0601q2lA0.4114.980.0540.6383.4.24.55NA
170.0602wvhA0.4155.990.0580.7484.1.1.1NA
180.0603eoqB0.4444.930.0630.6713.4.24.56NA
190.0602g49A0.4095.120.0480.6483.4.24.56NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.600.9561.080.650.993mmlB GO:0016787
10.320.5191.400.350.552zp2B GO:0000166 GO:0004860 GO:0005524 GO:0006469 GO:0030435
20.250.5781.850.210.622phcB
30.180.8422.590.170.993va7A GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0004039 GO:0004075 GO:0004847 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0016874 GO:0043419 GO:0046872
40.130.7343.140.320.913opfB
50.060.4312.880.100.513mmlE GO:0004039 GO:0016787 GO:0016829
60.060.3515.940.060.621bxrA GO:0000050 GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0004087 GO:0004088 GO:0005524 GO:0005829 GO:0005951 GO:0006221 GO:0006526 GO:0006807 GO:0008652 GO:0016597 GO:0016874 GO:0019856 GO:0044205 GO:0046872
70.060.2945.650.030.513floA GO:0003677 GO:0003887 GO:0005634 GO:0005635 GO:0005658 GO:0006260 GO:0006270 GO:0006273 GO:0016233 GO:0046982 GO:0071897
80.060.3116.040.040.583bg5B GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004736 GO:0005524 GO:0006090 GO:0006094 GO:0009374 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
90.060.3046.140.060.563tw6B GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004736 GO:0005524 GO:0006090 GO:0006094 GO:0009374 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
100.060.3355.530.050.563n6rG GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004658 GO:0005524 GO:0016874 GO:0019541 GO:0046872
110.060.2956.310.070.574hnvB GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004736 GO:0005524 GO:0006090 GO:0006094 GO:0009374 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
120.060.3215.570.090.553u9sI GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004485 GO:0005524 GO:0008300 GO:0046872 GO:1905202
130.060.3066.000.050.551dv2A GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0003989 GO:0004075 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0016874 GO:0045717 GO:0046872 GO:2001295
140.060.3055.490.030.503jrwA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0003989 GO:0004075 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005739 GO:0005741 GO:0005829 GO:0006084 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0006768 GO:0006853 GO:0008152 GO:0010629 GO:0010884 GO:0010906 GO:0012505 GO:0016020 GO:0016874 GO:0031325 GO:0031667 GO:0031999 GO:0043086 GO:0046322 GO:0046872 GO:0050995 GO:0051289 GO:0060421 GO:0097009 GO:2001295
150.060.2955.540.060.494rzqA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0003989 GO:0004075 GO:0005524 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0016874 GO:0046872 GO:2001295
160.060.3345.470.040.554qslD GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004736 GO:0005524 GO:0006090 GO:0006094 GO:0009374 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
170.060.3305.640.040.574qslA GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0004736 GO:0005524 GO:0006090 GO:0006094 GO:0009374 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
180.060.3035.490.060.504rcnB GO:0003824 GO:0004075 GO:0005524 GO:0016874 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005524 GO:0016811 GO:0043169 GO:0016879 GO:0004860
GO-Score 0.44 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.32
Biological Processes GO:1901565 GO:0044282 GO:0043605 GO:0019627 GO:0030435 GO:0006469
GO-Score 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.32 0.32
Cellular Component GO:0044424
GO-Score 0.36

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.