[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0256c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.10 5 1jb0A CLA Rep, Mult 30,33,34,37
20.06 3 1wygA FES Rep, Mult 158,159,160,162,166,177,178,179
30.06 3 4ku8A GLY Rep, Mult 27,31
40.04 2 3l26B MG Rep, Mult 18,22,23
50.02 1 4ilbA UNL Rep, Mult 97,100
60.02 1 4xgcC III Rep, Mult 81,82
70.02 1 3pyoN MG Rep, Mult 86,90
80.02 1 2p8wS GNP Rep, Mult 100,131,133
90.02 1 4rt4D III Rep, Mult 148,149
100.02 1 3k3wA CA Rep, Mult 132,140
110.02 1 2g38B MN Rep, Mult 152,155,156
120.02 1 3sl9A IMD Rep, Mult 44,86
130.02 1 3iilA MG Rep, Mult 11,12
140.02 1 3r6wA NFZ Rep, Mult 80,100,128
150.02 1 1fiqA FES Rep, Mult 34,35,37,91,92,95
160.02 1 3eubS FES Rep, Mult 123,124,127,128,129,130,132
170.02 1 1fiqA FAD Rep, Mult 47,48,49,73

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603eqlM0.3177.980.0370.5342.7.7.6103
20.0603b8eA0.3038.490.0330.5403.6.3.9NA
30.0603btaA0.3187.710.0400.5223.4.24.69NA
40.0602hg4C0.3197.970.0410.5412.3.1.945,104,106
50.0603cmmC0.3338.360.0660.5856.3.2.1931
60.0603ffzA0.3177.660.0570.5223.4.24.6992
70.0603dy5A0.3017.340.0700.4731.13.11.40,4.2.1.92NA
80.0603fg3A0.2576.910.0500.3874.2.1.92,1.13.11.40NA
90.0603h0gA0.3007.750.0300.4952.7.7.648
100.0602j5wA0.3117.800.0360.5131.16.3.1NA
110.0603b9jI0.1205.500.0150.1581.17.1.4,1.17.3.2105,241
120.0601y2mB0.3176.820.0300.4714.3.1.24NA
130.0602vuaA0.2077.050.0230.3203.4.24.69NA
140.0602np0A0.3108.170.0380.5323.4.24.69NA
150.0601mo7A0.1476.240.0390.2123.6.3.99
160.0602vz9B0.3297.500.0540.5272.3.1.85534
170.0603l9oA0.3048.420.0510.5413.6.4.13117,241
180.0603b8eC0.3296.970.0540.5003.6.3.945,82
190.0603gtgB0.3367.630.0480.5472.7.7.6NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.130.7293.690.090.814ut1A GO:0005198 GO:0009424 GO:0044780
10.070.4994.280.050.592d4yA GO:0005198 GO:0005576 GO:0009288 GO:0009424 GO:0044780 GO:0071973
20.060.2417.250.030.383dhuA GO:0003824 GO:0004556 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
30.060.2626.290.040.374k1pB GO:0009405 GO:0016020
40.060.2627.300.070.423ueqA GO:0003824 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0047669
50.060.2537.810.030.421rqgA GO:0000049 GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0004812 GO:0004825 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006431 GO:0016874 GO:0046872
60.060.2446.980.030.374gklA GO:0003824 GO:0005975
70.060.2667.440.040.424aieA GO:0003824 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0043896 GO:0046872
80.060.2427.260.050.383peiA GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0016787 GO:0019538 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
90.060.2557.150.070.404n0rA GO:0005975
100.060.2137.550.060.342qa1A GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114 GO:0071949
110.060.2296.870.030.352aekA GO:0016106 GO:0016829 GO:0045482
120.060.2117.260.060.334icyA GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114 GO:0071949
130.060.2387.480.050.382wssA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005753 GO:0005886 GO:0006754 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0015986 GO:0015991 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016820 GO:0033178 GO:0045261 GO:0046034 GO:0046933 GO:0046961
140.060.2167.230.030.343l7jB GO:0016020 GO:0047355
150.060.2017.340.050.323v7dB GO:0000082 GO:0000086 GO:0004842 GO:0005634 GO:0007049 GO:0007067 GO:0007126 GO:0016363 GO:0016567 GO:0019005 GO:0030435 GO:0031146 GO:0042787 GO:0043130 GO:0043224 GO:0050815 GO:0051301 GO:0061630
160.060.2016.540.060.303eihA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005768 GO:0006810 GO:0007033 GO:0008568 GO:0010008 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016125 GO:0016236 GO:0016887 GO:0031122 GO:0032511 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0045053 GO:0045324 GO:0051260 GO:0070676 GO:1990621
170.060.1927.950.040.334uorA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0008484 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0046872
180.060.2206.670.020.331gdhA GO:0008152 GO:0008465 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0051287 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005198 GO:0004556 GO:0047669
GO-Score 0.18 0.06 0.06
Biological Processes GO:0030031 GO:0044781 GO:0070925
GO-Score 0.37 0.37 0.37
Cellular Component GO:0044461
GO-Score 0.37

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.