[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0163

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 4 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.44 45 5byuG COA Rep, Mult 67,68,69,95,96,97,98,122,124,126,131,133
20.32 26 1wn3C HXC Rep, Mult 29,30,31,33,34,36,75,76,77,78,114
30.07 12 4m20C COA Rep, Mult 44,67,68,69,126,127
40.03 3 2xemB SSV Rep, Mult 47,48,50,66,89,91,101,144
50.02 4 3p3iA FAH Rep, Mult 44,67,68,123
60.01 1 2oiwA MG Rep, Mult 26,28
70.01 1 2cyeA ZN Rep, Mult 29,33
80.01 2 2w3xC POP Rep, Mult 19,20,21,45

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.2991lo8A0.7602.200.1140.8743.1.2.2339,102
20.1791y7uA0.6242.870.1430.7813.1.2.2044,69
30.0773ir3A0.5732.940.0730.6954.2.1.-123
40.0661mkaA0.5632.920.0820.7294.2.1.60NA
50.0661z6bA0.5472.500.0350.6694.2.1.-NA
60.0602ownB0.7232.430.1250.8543.1.2.1436,78
70.0602gllA0.5872.640.0560.7294.2.1.-NA
80.0601a39A0.4394.940.0710.7293.2.1.451
90.0602hx5A0.7462.030.1530.8483.1.2.-89
100.0603khpC0.5593.460.1160.7291.-.-.-NA
110.0602jfdA0.3534.850.0290.6232.3.1.85NA
120.0601tbuB0.5182.100.0610.5893.1.2.2NA
130.0601u1zB0.5792.790.0660.7224.2.1.-NA
140.0601pn4D0.5473.460.0420.7294.2.1.-NA
150.0602vz8B0.5083.170.0150.6752.3.1.85NA
160.0601iq6B0.5602.550.1030.6624.2.1.17136
170.0602qq2C0.6473.080.1130.8153.1.2.238
180.0602pffB0.5743.600.0720.7812.3.1.8688
190.0601gpiA0.4125.130.0380.7153.2.1.91123
200.0602c2iA0.5622.660.0960.6754.2.1.17104
210.0603b7kC0.6173.510.1200.8283.1.2.145
220.0602uv8G0.5763.650.0670.7812.3.1.86NA
230.0602v1oE0.6423.020.1200.8013.1.2.251,92
240.0603el6A0.5123.160.0580.6824.2.1.6184

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.400.7252.400.300.852cyeC
10.330.7102.210.160.831njkA GO:0006635 GO:0016787 GO:0047617
20.310.7612.210.110.871lo7A GO:0016787 GO:0018739
30.310.7711.860.240.861z54A GO:0016787
40.310.7622.310.140.882hljA GO:0016740 GO:0016746
50.300.7591.440.210.822egiC GO:0016787
60.290.7392.330.180.853r87A GO:0016787
70.290.7872.070.170.881s5uE GO:0005886 GO:0006629 GO:0016020 GO:0016787 GO:0016790
80.280.7582.020.150.862hx5A GO:0016787 GO:0016790 GO:0042372
90.260.7191.740.110.793hm0A GO:0016787 GO:0016790
100.260.7412.300.210.852oiwA
110.240.7552.050.130.852pzhA GO:0006629 GO:0016787
120.230.7612.310.130.884k00A GO:0004778 GO:0016290 GO:0016787 GO:0016790 GO:0042372 GO:0047617
130.170.7292.680.100.872essA GO:0006633 GO:0016790
140.140.6112.790.200.742gvhB GO:0016787
150.070.6161.130.190.652egiI GO:0016787
160.060.3114.910.040.504ervA GO:0005216 GO:0005219 GO:0005262 GO:0005509 GO:0005516 GO:0005783 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0006816 GO:0006874 GO:0015278 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016529 GO:0031090 GO:0033017 GO:0034220 GO:0043231 GO:0051209 GO:0051289 GO:0055085 GO:0070588 GO:0071277 GO:0071286 GO:0071313 GO:0071318 GO:1903779
170.060.2965.640.030.595d80B GO:0000166 GO:0000221 GO:0000329 GO:0003677 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0005524 GO:0005773 GO:0005774 GO:0006314 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007035 GO:0012505 GO:0015991 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016539 GO:0016787 GO:0016820 GO:0030908 GO:0033178 GO:0044267 GO:0046034 GO:0046961 GO:0090305
180.060.2534.100.070.392lkzA GO:0000166 GO:0000245 GO:0000381 GO:0000398 GO:0003676 GO:0003677 GO:0003723 GO:0003729 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005681 GO:0006396 GO:0006397 GO:0006915 GO:0008270 GO:0008285 GO:0008380 GO:0042981 GO:0043065 GO:0044822 GO:0046872
190.060.2475.320.040.472g77B GO:0000042 GO:0000139 GO:0000166 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005794 GO:0005796 GO:0006810 GO:0006891 GO:0006914 GO:0007264 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0048705 GO:0070062 GO:1903358 GO:1903434 GO:2000156 GO:2000785
200.060.2285.120.040.402dizA GO:0003756 GO:0005783 GO:0005788 GO:0006457 GO:0016853 GO:0034976 GO:0043066 GO:0043202 GO:0043277 GO:0045454 GO:0070062
210.060.7392.360.220.862gf6A
220.060.2205.420.020.391eo1A


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0047617 GO:0018739 GO:0016746
GO-Score 0.33 0.31 0.31
Biological Processes GO:0006635
GO-Score 0.33
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.