[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0151c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.04 2 4zm5B MG Rep, Mult 116,119
20.04 2 3vh7E MG Rep, Mult 108,111
30.02 1 5da5A CA Rep, Mult 113,116
40.02 1 2iwhA ANP Rep, Mult 67,68,85,86,406
50.02 1 4zzbB XE Rep, Mult 48,222,225,226
60.02 1 2bh1A CA Rep, Mult 53,55
70.02 1 2bf0X CA Rep, Mult 118,121
80.02 1 1c9uB CA Rep, Mult 84,96
90.02 1 4fe1F CLA Rep, Mult 563,567
100.02 1 2gnmB MN Rep, Mult 322,324
110.02 1 2gnmA CA Rep, Mult 320,322,348
120.02 1 1mo8A ATP Rep, Mult 306,317,329,331,337
130.02 1 4rku4 CLA Rep, Mult 567,570
140.02 1 2ll8A PNS Rep, Mult 83,86
150.02 1 3asoA DMU Rep, Mult 100,103
160.02 1 1n38A CH1 Rep, Mult 282,283,316,317,318,319
170.02 1 5tglA HEE Rep, Mult 191,246
180.02 1 1y66A DIO Rep, Mult 85,89
190.02 1 4e3wB PRO Rep, Mult 4,96
200.02 1 2xquB CVM Rep, Mult 81,82

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602cseW0.3017.640.0450.4743.6.4.13NA
20.0603eqlM0.3138.080.0220.5192.7.7.6532
30.0601s46A0.2877.970.0640.4762.4.1.4NA
40.0602vuaA0.2067.370.0370.3253.4.24.69NA
50.0602veaA0.3037.170.0350.4692.7.13.359,239
60.0602vz8B0.2907.800.0430.4712.3.1.85NA
70.0602jlzB0.2247.540.0450.3543.4.21.91254,272,275
80.0602qf7A0.2907.640.0420.4686.4.1.1NA
90.0601h16A0.3057.890.0470.5032.3.1.54NA
100.0603btaA0.2977.890.0530.4853.4.24.69NA
110.0601ahpA0.2948.030.0560.4902.4.1.1374
120.0601z0hB0.2017.790.0170.3283.4.24.69NA
130.0602zufA0.2927.630.0360.4616.1.1.19304
140.0602vz9B0.2817.480.0410.4412.3.1.85NA
150.0603g61A0.3327.300.0460.4973.6.3.4489
160.0601w27A0.2958.060.0610.4884.3.1.24NA
170.0602pflA0.3097.790.0570.5052.3.1.54246,389
180.0602np0A0.2868.580.0460.5103.4.24.69113
190.0602vz8A0.3048.050.0400.5052.3.1.85NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.300.8631.740.110.894ut1A GO:0005198 GO:0009424 GO:0044780
10.110.6382.460.100.682d4yA GO:0005198 GO:0005576 GO:0009288 GO:0009424 GO:0044780 GO:0071973
20.060.3347.810.030.555i2aB GO:0003824 GO:0008152
30.060.3427.940.030.575bweA GO:0003824 GO:0008152
40.060.3357.890.040.555i2gA GO:0003824 GO:0008152
50.060.3357.910.060.552yajC GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016829 GO:0043722
60.060.3317.980.040.554mtjA GO:0003824 GO:0008152
70.060.3247.930.030.542f3oA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016829
80.060.3127.700.070.511cm5A GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005975 GO:0006006 GO:0006567 GO:0008152 GO:0008861 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
90.060.2637.380.030.414n0rA GO:0005975
100.060.2217.420.050.353peiA GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0016787 GO:0019538 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
110.060.1996.660.040.292aekA GO:0016106 GO:0016829 GO:0045482
120.060.2067.110.040.311yw1A GO:0004497 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0055114
130.060.2327.770.030.382wssA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005753 GO:0005886 GO:0006754 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0015986 GO:0015991 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016820 GO:0033178 GO:0045261 GO:0046034 GO:0046933 GO:0046961
140.060.2026.700.060.291wvgA GO:0009103 GO:0009243 GO:0016829 GO:0047733
150.060.2036.220.060.291n8pA GO:0003824 GO:0003962 GO:0004123 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0016829 GO:0019343 GO:0019344 GO:0019346 GO:0030170 GO:0042802 GO:0044540 GO:0071266 GO:0080146
160.060.1656.590.020.245fofA GO:0000166 GO:0002161 GO:0004812 GO:0005524 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006450 GO:0016874
170.060.1937.350.040.303v7dB GO:0000082 GO:0000086 GO:0004842 GO:0005634 GO:0007049 GO:0007067 GO:0007126 GO:0016363 GO:0016567 GO:0019005 GO:0030435 GO:0031146 GO:0042787 GO:0043130 GO:0043224 GO:0050815 GO:0051301 GO:0061630
180.060.1726.850.050.265fo4B GO:0000166 GO:0002161 GO:0004812 GO:0004823 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006429 GO:0006450 GO:0016874


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005198
GO-Score 0.38
Biological Processes GO:0044780
GO-Score 0.38
Cellular Component GO:0009424
GO-Score 0.38

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.