[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0122

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.10 5 2glpB BDE Rep, Mult 17,100,102
20.06 3 4atkB NUC Rep, Mult 63,64,67
30.06 3 2ql2C NUC Rep, Mult 43,62
40.04 2 4q9lA PHE Rep, Mult 68,72
50.04 2 1wn3B HXC Rep, Mult 69,78,79,80,81
60.02 1 3gf0A MG Rep, Mult 89,90
70.02 1 1lajA NUC Rep, Mult 9,10
80.02 1 3n6rA BTI Rep, Mult 116,121
90.02 1 2w35A MG Rep, Mult 24,83
100.02 1 1xtmB CU Rep, Mult 43,45,61,114
110.02 1 4rb62 MG Rep, Mult 65,68
120.02 1 2vuoA MAN Rep, Mult 17,96
130.02 1 1j88A UUU Rep, Mult 17,77
140.02 1 2pk0C MG Rep, Mult 24,92
150.02 1 3r2aB III Rep, Mult 69,73,79

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0661u1zB0.5743.480.0460.8364.2.1.-NA
20.0602ejwA0.4594.640.0760.8031.1.1.3NA
30.0602vz8A0.4924.010.0450.7792.3.1.8539
40.0601qaxA0.4844.060.0630.7701.1.1.88NA
50.0602vkzG0.4813.780.0610.7052.3.1.38,3.1.2.1468
60.0602qvrA0.4654.770.0670.8363.1.3.1114
70.0601lo8A0.4623.550.0730.6643.1.2.2370,98
80.0602vz8B0.4904.030.0870.7462.3.1.8539
90.0602zt5A0.4624.800.0420.8116.1.1.14NA
100.0603el6A0.6063.350.1310.8614.2.1.61NA
110.0603d6xB0.5593.570.0480.8114.2.1.-NA
120.0603khpC0.4834.150.0710.7301.-.-.-NA
130.0603khpA0.4753.880.0790.6971.-.-.-NA
140.0601mskA0.4704.370.0480.7702.1.1.1361
150.0601jx1A0.4574.040.0620.7465.5.1.6NA
160.0603cmqA0.4384.750.0520.7876.1.1.20NA
170.0601pn4D0.4704.000.1130.7214.2.1.-90
180.0602gllA0.5703.630.0560.8364.2.1.-NA
190.0602gq1A0.3444.570.0520.5743.1.3.1135
200.0601iq6B0.4763.860.0790.7134.2.1.17NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.6003.250.100.854ln9A GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0031177 GO:0048037
10.070.6073.470.040.865hd6A GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0008693 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0019171 GO:0034017 GO:0047451
20.070.5633.940.070.845bp4R GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0031177 GO:0050111 GO:0055114
30.070.5643.940.070.845bp4L GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0031177 GO:0050111 GO:0055114
40.070.5743.480.050.841u1zB GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006633 GO:0009245 GO:0016829 GO:0016836 GO:0019171 GO:0047451
50.070.5743.440.050.845buyA GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006633 GO:0009245 GO:0016829 GO:0016836 GO:0019171 GO:0047451
60.070.6063.350.130.863el6A GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0017000 GO:0031177 GO:0033068 GO:0047879 GO:0048037 GO:0055114
70.070.6043.400.060.852cf2C
80.070.5633.900.080.845bp4A GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0031177 GO:0050111 GO:0055114
90.070.6053.520.070.864b0cA GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0006636 GO:0008693 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0019171 GO:0034017 GO:0047451
100.070.6043.370.040.855hd6F GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0008693 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0019171 GO:0034017 GO:0047451
110.070.5683.680.050.845buwA GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006633 GO:0009245 GO:0016829 GO:0016836 GO:0019171 GO:0047451
120.070.5643.550.050.825buyE GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006633 GO:0009245 GO:0016829 GO:0016836 GO:0019171 GO:0047451
130.070.6023.500.070.864cl6C GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0006636 GO:0008693 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0019171 GO:0034017 GO:0047451
140.070.5643.870.040.843az9G GO:0005737 GO:0006633 GO:0016836
150.070.5723.380.060.833d6xB GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006633 GO:0009245 GO:0016829 GO:0016836 GO:0019171 GO:0047451
160.070.5703.480.070.834i83A GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006633 GO:0009245 GO:0016829 GO:0016836 GO:0019171 GO:0047451
170.070.5693.820.050.843b7jA GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006633 GO:0009245 GO:0016829 GO:0016836 GO:0019171 GO:0047451
180.070.5513.620.060.824zw0C GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0006633 GO:0009245 GO:0016829 GO:0016836 GO:0019171 GO:0047451


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0019842 GO:0033218 GO:0072341
GO-Score 0.38 0.38 0.38
Biological Processes GO:0006633 GO:0055114 GO:0009245
GO-Score 0.13 0.13 0.07
Cellular Component GO:0005737
GO-Score 0.13

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.