[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0080

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.35 21 2ptfA FMN Rep, Mult 45,47,48,49,50,61,62,63,66,67,68
20.17 7 2fg9A FAD Rep, Mult 16,87,96,97,98,99,100,102,141,142,143,145
30.03 2 1xxo0 III Rep, Mult 33,35,39,40,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,81,85,96,98,102,103,141
40.03 2 2vpaA PYR Rep, Mult 50,61
50.02 1 1w3rA 2MN Rep, Mult 47,48
60.01 1 3hy8A PO4 Rep, Mult 53,54,59,61,113,117
70.01 1 2i51A FMN Rep, Mult 52,59,61,137
80.01 1 3fkhC CA Rep, Mult 17,18

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.1291ty9B0.6273.280.0960.7961.4.-.-44,49
20.0661nrgA0.6243.090.0940.7891.4.3.5144
30.0602puxB0.4644.150.0740.6843.4.21.5NA
40.0602zwlH0.4893.940.0900.6913.4.21.21NA
50.0601eawA0.4614.240.0500.6843.4.21.109,3.4.21.-NA
60.0602qy0C0.2424.390.0450.3883.4.21.41,3.4.21.4262
70.0602iphA0.4673.820.0910.6783.4.22.6640
80.0601c5mD0.4813.950.1070.6843.4.21.6NA
90.0601dleA0.4494.330.0500.6713.4.21.47NA
100.0601autC0.4804.010.0830.6913.4.21.69NA
110.0601jnwA0.6143.260.1380.7831.4.3.5NA
120.0602ok5A0.4693.970.0470.6783.4.21.4751
130.0603h09B0.4723.960.0770.6973.4.21.72NA
140.0602gv6A0.4644.250.0420.6843.4.21.109NA
150.0601rtkA0.3065.720.0350.5923.4.21.4776,79,106
160.0601z8gA0.4734.390.0750.7043.4.21.106NA
170.0603dfjA0.4554.260.0500.6783.4.21.-NA
180.0601ci0A0.6153.250.1020.7961.4.3.5144
190.0601ekbB0.4634.190.0520.6783.4.21.9NA
200.0601bbrE0.3303.550.0330.4673.4.21.5NA
210.0601zjkA0.4764.150.0820.6973.4.21.10422,98

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.420.7111.750.310.793cp3A GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
10.370.7172.310.300.843fkhD GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
20.310.7193.190.160.892x1kA GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
30.300.7671.210.160.803u5wA GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
40.280.6302.630.160.752htdB GO:0004733 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0042823 GO:0055114
50.270.6372.300.130.755escA GO:0004733 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0042823 GO:0055114
60.260.7302.910.170.891rfeA GO:0004733 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0042823 GO:0055114
70.230.7313.140.110.892fg9A GO:0000166 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
80.230.7232.300.200.842hq9B GO:0000166 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
90.230.6742.570.120.802htiA GO:0000166 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
100.220.6492.910.130.804qvbB GO:0004733 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0030170 GO:0042803 GO:0042816 GO:0042823 GO:0055114
110.220.7463.050.120.934ybnA GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
120.220.6702.610.060.823tgvA GO:0004733 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0042823 GO:0055114
130.220.6772.910.120.845bncA GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
140.210.7112.630.110.862furA GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
150.200.6802.830.100.833dnhA GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
160.200.6252.860.120.761wv4A GO:0004733 GO:0005829 GO:0008615 GO:0009443 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016638 GO:0042816 GO:0055114
170.190.6682.060.120.762hq7B GO:0004733 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0042823 GO:0055114
180.180.6293.190.100.762ou5A GO:0000166 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
190.170.6363.190.140.801jnwA GO:0004733 GO:0005829 GO:0008615 GO:0009443 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016638 GO:0042816 GO:0055114
200.170.6602.220.120.763ec6A GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
210.160.6172.970.120.743f7eA GO:0004733 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0042823 GO:0055114
220.080.5242.290.170.613r5lA GO:0005618 GO:0005886 GO:0010181 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0055114 GO:0070967
230.060.3075.640.050.591ay0A GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0005737 GO:0006098 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
240.060.3073.990.050.451a9nB GO:0000166 GO:0000398 GO:0002230 GO:0003676 GO:0003723 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005681 GO:0005686 GO:0005730 GO:0006397 GO:0008380 GO:0030529 GO:0035614 GO:0071013 GO:0098792


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0010181 GO:0016641
GO-Score 0.87 0.55
Biological Processes GO:0055114 GO:1901576 GO:0009108 GO:0042822
GO-Score 0.87 0.55 0.55 0.55
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.