[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0078A

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.47 19 3ercC CA Rep, Mult 27,41,43
20.05 2 5cfsA APC Rep, Mult 27,37,39,40,41,43,136,137,140,148,149
30.02 1 1zelA NA Rep, Mult 152,155,156
40.02 1 4xjeA AMP Rep, Mult 26,27,41,43,136,137,140,143,149
50.02 1 1fa0A 3AD Rep, Mult 25,43,98,100

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0801jmsA0.4634.800.0830.6902.7.7.3198
20.0601px5B0.4995.340.1140.8332.7.7.-NA
30.0602nomB0.3095.430.1090.5082.7.7.52NA
40.0603c66A0.5074.950.0600.8022.7.7.19137
50.0602q0cB0.4664.870.1230.7562.7.7.52NA
60.0602ytzA0.4544.860.0530.7362.1.1.3229,43
70.0602dr9A0.4904.780.1090.7722.7.7.21,2.7.7.2529,43,98
80.0602azdB0.4135.560.0520.7312.4.1.1NA
90.0603iv7A0.4405.180.0810.7061.3.1.32NA
100.0601ou5A0.4466.070.0560.8482.7.7.2527,43,145,146
110.0602q0eA0.4715.250.1630.7872.7.7.52NA
120.0601rrmA0.4495.250.0640.7361.1.1.77NA
130.0603dwbA0.4365.070.0520.7063.4.24.71NA
140.0602c4mC0.4435.650.0910.7512.4.1.1NA
150.0603hx0A0.4704.540.0650.6802.7.7.7,98
160.0603gpbA0.4195.870.0650.7722.4.1.1NA
170.0602gafD0.5764.150.0560.8072.7.7.1943,98
180.0601ahpA0.4135.610.0570.7362.4.1.1NA
190.0601fa9A0.3826.050.0490.7312.4.1.110

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.170.5952.720.140.714fo1A GO:0046677
10.070.6173.870.070.814wseA GO:0000166 GO:0004652 GO:0005524 GO:0006351 GO:0006397 GO:0016740 GO:0019012
20.060.3865.400.030.633kzwA GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0016787 GO:0019538 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
30.060.3486.700.020.733loqA GO:0000166 GO:0006950
40.060.2995.470.050.522xtzA GO:0000166 GO:0001789 GO:0003924 GO:0004871 GO:0005095 GO:0005525 GO:0005789 GO:0005834 GO:0005886 GO:0006571 GO:0007165 GO:0007186 GO:0008219 GO:0009094 GO:0009506 GO:0009738 GO:0009740 GO:0009749 GO:0009785 GO:0009788 GO:0009789 GO:0009845 GO:0010027 GO:0010119 GO:0010244 GO:0016020 GO:0016247 GO:0019001 GO:0031683 GO:0034260 GO:0042127 GO:0046872 GO:0071215 GO:0072593
50.060.3565.340.070.591xgkA GO:0001081 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006808 GO:0016491 GO:0045892 GO:0051287 GO:0055114 GO:0070401 GO:0070402 GO:0070403 GO:0070404 GO:0070405 GO:0070406 GO:0090295
60.060.3266.170.060.641k77A GO:0008903 GO:0016853
70.060.3255.660.040.561td9D GO:0005737 GO:0006085 GO:0008152 GO:0008959 GO:0016407 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
80.060.3556.150.070.672j3lB GO:0000166 GO:0002161 GO:0004812 GO:0004827 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006433 GO:0006450 GO:0016874
90.060.3255.270.040.543bwgB GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
100.060.3446.150.030.651gpmA GO:0000166 GO:0003921 GO:0003922 GO:0005524 GO:0005829 GO:0006164 GO:0006177 GO:0006541 GO:0016462 GO:0016874 GO:0042802
110.060.2946.080.050.541tq5A GO:0008127 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
120.060.3455.350.040.595ap1A GO:0000166 GO:0004672 GO:0004674 GO:0004712 GO:0004713 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005819 GO:0006468 GO:0007051 GO:0007052 GO:0007093 GO:0007094 GO:0008284 GO:0010862 GO:0016020 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0018108 GO:0051304
130.060.2345.320.020.392hpvA GO:0008752 GO:0009055 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016652 GO:0016661 GO:0055114
140.060.2755.970.040.511fnuA GO:0005576 GO:0009405
150.060.3155.680.030.551fsgA GO:0000166 GO:0000310 GO:0004422 GO:0005737 GO:0006166 GO:0009116 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0032263 GO:0032264 GO:0032265 GO:0046872 GO:0052657
160.060.2885.610.050.514pw7E GO:0003677 GO:0004842 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005720 GO:0006511 GO:0007049 GO:0008270 GO:0008283 GO:0010216 GO:0016567 GO:0016874 GO:0030154 GO:0042393 GO:0046872 GO:0051726 GO:0051865 GO:0061630 GO:0071158 GO:0090308
170.060.2666.110.030.504ilsA GO:0003824 GO:0006522 GO:0008784 GO:0016853 GO:0030170 GO:0030632
180.060.2605.640.020.463gwyB GO:0016787


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0036094 GO:1901265
GO-Score 0.37 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0042221
GO-Score 0.34
Cellular Component GO:0019012 GO:0009506 GO:0005834 GO:0005789
GO-Score 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.