[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0057

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.15 8 1qg6A TCL Rep, Mult 46,99,100,103,106
20.07 4 4d45C GLU Rep, Mult 103,104,105,106
30.04 2 3ak3D EDO Rep, Mult 149,152
40.04 2 1izlA CLA Rep, Mult 113,117
50.04 2 2xctB CPF Rep, Mult 11,12,166
60.04 2 3hrdF NIO Rep, Mult 59,60,61
70.02 1 2o9eA HG Rep, Mult 120,153,161
80.02 1 4pr7A ADA Rep, Mult 10,89
90.02 1 4af5A MG Rep, Mult 34,170
100.02 1 1yb1A AE2 Rep, Mult 66,152,155
110.02 1 1zxyD MG Rep, Mult 8,19
120.02 1 1bn8A CA Rep, Mult 104,134,137
130.02 1 3mjlB 2AI Rep, Mult 96,108

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602b35C0.3915.410.0730.7111.3.1.9NA
20.0603enkA0.4984.920.1120.8325.1.3.2NA
30.0601iy8A0.4994.370.1040.7751.1.1.-106
40.0601cydD0.4954.310.1650.7691.1.1.1846
50.0601sb8A0.5014.890.0540.8385.1.3.7NA
60.0601bvrA0.4924.210.0830.7571.3.1.9NA
70.0601qsgG0.5253.810.1070.7571.3.1.9147
80.0603fnhA0.5014.210.0750.7751.3.1.990
90.0601nhdD0.1764.480.0880.2721.3.1.9NA
100.0602cfcC0.4894.260.1000.7511.1.1.26888,97
110.0602cfcA0.4934.210.1000.7511.1.1.268NA
120.0601ipeA0.5124.240.0890.7751.1.1.236NA
130.0601xhlA0.4934.870.0740.8091.1.1.23652
140.0603gr6D0.5323.850.1190.7751.3.1.9147
150.0601z45A0.5055.020.0920.8505.1.3.2,5.1.3.3NA
160.0602o2sA0.5383.840.1630.7801.3.1.9NA
170.0601uluB0.5233.930.1360.7631.3.1.10NA
180.0601gegE0.5074.230.0970.7751.1.1.5NA
190.0601ipeB0.5114.240.0890.7751.1.1.236NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.5323.890.140.772wywA GO:0000166 GO:0004318 GO:0006633 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
10.070.4994.940.080.843m1aD GO:0016491 GO:0055114
20.070.5104.210.120.772dknA GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0047042 GO:0055114
30.070.4945.100.060.832ntvA GO:0004318 GO:0006633 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
40.070.5044.410.130.784ituA GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
50.070.4824.580.110.774ureA GO:0016491 GO:0055114
60.070.4904.820.080.792pd3A GO:0004318 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0016491 GO:0030497 GO:0051289 GO:0055114
70.070.4674.670.120.754yqzA GO:0016491 GO:0055114
80.070.5124.280.110.781ae1B GO:0009710 GO:0016491 GO:0050356 GO:0055114
90.070.4724.500.130.741hdcA GO:0006629 GO:0008202 GO:0008207 GO:0016491 GO:0047044 GO:0055114
100.070.4994.370.100.771iy8A GO:0016491 GO:0055114
110.070.4864.980.090.814yaiA GO:0016491 GO:0055114
120.070.4695.210.070.792ph3A GO:0004316 GO:0006633 GO:0016491 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
130.070.4934.460.120.773tscA GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
140.070.5313.860.120.774nr0C GO:0004318 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0016491 GO:0016631 GO:0030497 GO:0051289 GO:0055114
150.070.4894.500.100.764e4yA GO:0016491 GO:0016853 GO:0055114
160.070.4585.040.060.764lvuA GO:0016491 GO:0055114
170.070.4805.050.070.814rlhB GO:0004318 GO:0006633 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
180.070.4784.900.080.783ojfA GO:0000166 GO:0004318 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0016491 GO:0030497 GO:0051289 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0003824 GO:1901265 GO:0036094
GO-Score 0.41 0.38 0.38
Biological Processes GO:0044710
GO-Score 0.59
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.