[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv0051

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.09 3 2h8pC GOA Rep, Mult 125,129
20.06 2 1siwA SF4 Rep, Mult 244,245,247,251,270,271,278
30.06 2 2axtK CLA Rep, Mult 277,278,281
40.04 1 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 79,83,521
50.04 1 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 66,224,227,499
60.03 1 1vf5S III Rep, Mult 252,253
70.03 1 2axtM CLA Rep, Mult 280,284
80.03 1 2wsfJ CLA Rep, Mult 399,403
90.03 1 1no3A 4NC Rep, Mult 197,202,222,233,423
100.03 1 3lw52 CLA Rep, Mult 474,478
110.03 1 1hu9A 4HM Rep, Mult 248,251,252,255,267
120.03 1 1frvB F3S Rep, Mult 410,415

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602vuaA0.2357.400.0410.3773.4.24.69318
20.0601qbaA0.3188.030.0370.5413.2.1.52250,256
30.0602np0A0.3257.740.0490.5273.4.24.69NA
40.0602etfB0.3177.150.0250.4953.4.24.69NA
50.0601c7sA0.3198.050.0330.5433.2.1.52NA
60.0601ygeA0.3158.090.0280.5361.13.11.12NA
70.0603ffzA0.3207.810.0350.5203.4.24.69NA
80.0603jvpD0.3187.640.0560.5212.7.1.16NA
90.0603bg3A0.3247.680.0540.5326.4.1.1241
100.0601bxrA0.3217.700.0400.5296.3.5.5NA
110.0601jqnA0.3277.740.0310.5364.1.1.31NA
120.0601br2A0.2747.950.0340.4543.6.1.32246
130.0601kblA0.3247.500.0480.5112.7.9.1NA
140.0602iukA0.3556.960.0380.5361.13.11.12NA
150.0601fziA0.3177.420.0440.4951.14.13.25NA
160.0601jqoA0.3267.570.0480.5204.1.1.31NA
170.0601no3A0.3546.960.0250.5341.13.11.12NA
180.0601w6jA0.3357.820.0400.5575.4.99.7270
190.0603f93A0.3257.790.0360.5343.2.1.-NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.260.7241.940.090.765f15A GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740
10.120.5484.780.090.683wakA GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
20.110.5234.490.100.643wajA GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
30.070.5005.190.100.633rceA GO:0000287 GO:0004576 GO:0005886 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0018279 GO:0046872
40.060.2727.600.050.445azaA GO:0004576 GO:0005215 GO:0005363 GO:0006486 GO:0006810 GO:0006974 GO:0008643 GO:0015768 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0030288 GO:0034289 GO:0042597 GO:0042956 GO:0043190 GO:0055052 GO:0060326 GO:1901982 GO:1990060
50.060.2627.750.040.431lshA GO:0005319 GO:0006869 GO:0045735
60.060.2387.120.030.373vu1B GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0046872
70.060.2477.430.050.403wovA GO:0004576 GO:0006486 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
80.060.2377.720.020.393waiA GO:0004576 GO:0005215 GO:0005363 GO:0006486 GO:0006810 GO:0006974 GO:0008643 GO:0015768 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0030288 GO:0034289 GO:0042597 GO:0042956 GO:0043190 GO:0046872 GO:0055052 GO:0060326 GO:1901982 GO:1990060
90.060.2447.140.040.384gklA GO:0003824 GO:0005975
100.060.2217.240.040.352amxA GO:0009168 GO:0019239
110.060.2126.930.020.324xmpG GO:0005198 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0019012 GO:0019031 GO:0019062 GO:0020002 GO:0033644 GO:0039663 GO:0044174 GO:0044175 GO:0046718 GO:0055036
120.060.1716.790.030.263aagA GO:0004576 GO:0005886 GO:0006486 GO:0006487 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0046872
130.060.2286.570.050.344v2pB GO:0003824 GO:0004315 GO:0006633 GO:0008152 GO:0016740
140.060.2135.430.030.282lgzA GO:0004576 GO:0004579 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0006486 GO:0006487 GO:0008250 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0018279 GO:0043687
150.060.2137.000.020.334j6rG GO:0005198 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0019012 GO:0019031 GO:0019062 GO:0039663 GO:0044174 GO:0044175 GO:0046718 GO:0055036
160.060.1566.220.070.233aagB GO:0004576 GO:0005886 GO:0006486 GO:0006487 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0046872
170.060.1706.690.040.253e20B GO:0002184 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006412 GO:0006415 GO:0016149 GO:0018444
180.060.1675.310.030.221r5aA GO:0016740 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0043169 GO:0004576
GO-Score 0.54 0.31
Biological Processes GO:0006486
GO-Score 0.31
Cellular Component GO:0016021
GO-Score 0.49

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.